Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

دستچین

@dastchean

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,338subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001031823690
TypeChannel
Username@dastchean
Created6 March 2016measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/dastchean

Growth

1,3371,3381,337.55 August 2026 — 1,337 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,337 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,338 subscribers5 August 20269 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,337–1,338 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 00:521,338+1
6 Aug 2026, 08:031,337no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:231,337first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 24 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
37.0%
avg views ÷ 1,338 subscribers
Avg views / post
495
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.735%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026
Posts held20 (24 June 20262 August 2026)
Views total3,957
Reactions total26
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 08:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

2 Aug 2026, 07:12 UTC≈340 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026

سئوال: آیا یکی داره مهندسی میکنه که امریکا در ایران از اتم استفاده کنه تا روسیه هم در اوکراین استفاده کنه؟ یا برعکس، یکی داره سعی میکنه روسیه رو طوری در اوکراین تحقیر کنه که راهی جز اتم براش نمونه و بعدش آمریکا در ایران از اتم استفاده کنه؟ یا یکی داره هر دو فشار رو با هم پیش میبره و هدفش عادی سازی استفاده از اتم هست؟ @dastchean

26 Jul 2026, 17:31 UTC≈421 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

تو این تصویر چی می‌بینید؟ بنویسید. هفته دیگه پاسخ رو می‌نویسم. @vagheiro

21 Jul 2026, 00:33 UTC≈728 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

📽📽📽 سه ماه مانده به انتخابات عمومی پارلمان اسرائیل، اورلی (مژگان) نوی، روزنامه‌نگار و فعال حقوق بشر اسرائیلی، در تحلیلی از تحولات سیاسی این کشور، به وضعیت شکننده ائتلاف حاکم و آینده حزب لیکود پرداخت. او با اشاره به نظرسنجی‌های اخیر، مدعی شد ائتلاف بنیامین نتانیاهو در انتخابات آینده اکثریت خود را از دست خواهد داد و حزب لیکود نیز با کاهش چشمگیر حمایت عمومی روبه‌روست. به گفته او، تلاش نتانیاهو برای به تعویق انداختن انت

20 Jul 2026, 15:36 UTC≈359 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

خدای بازار، خدای درون گفتند صدق تابع تصدیق است. و تصدیق، بازار دارد. حال ببینیم بزرگ‌ترین کالای تاریخ در این بازار چه سرنوشتی پیدا می‌کند: خدا. الهیات قرن‌ها بر یک ستون ایستاده بود: خدا مستقل‌ترین موجود، از ناظر است. همه‌چیز به ادراک ما وابسته باشد، او هست؛ چه تصدیقش کنیم، چه انکار. او خود ناظر مطلق بود؛ همان که جهان، پیش از آنکه چشمی برای دیدنش باشد، در نگاه او حاضر بود. اما آنجا که صدق از اجماع ناظران بجوشد، تخت

20 Jul 2026, 15:01 UTC≈266 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @Karimipour_KVideo

باورنکردنی است تا جایی که به خاطرم می رسد، این چند لحظه پاسخ های جناب عراقچی در ۷۰ سال اخیر بی سابقه بوده است. خوب و چند بار گوش دهیم: بمباران بیت از طریق حفره امنیتی صورت گرفته و این حفره امنیتی همچنان وجود دارد. این گفته ایشان چندان مهم و تازه نیست؛ ولی آنجا که ایشان می گویند: "این‌حفره امنیتی فقط در نفوذ و گرفتن اطلاعات نیست، در جهت گیری به تصمیم سازی ها هم گاهی هست و از ان بدتر در جهت دهی به فضای روانی ما هم هست

20 Jul 2026, 14:58 UTC≈310 views0 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

بازار تصدیق تلقی کهن از حقیقت ساده بود: حقیقت جایی آن بیرون ایستاده است، مستقل و دست‌نخورده، و ما کاشفان آنیم. معرفت آینه بود و صدق، مطابقت با واقع. این تصویر آرام‌بخش، یک قرن است که از دو سو ترک برداشته. نخست از سوی فیزیک؛ کوانتوم نشان داد الکترون تا مشاهده نشود، جایی ندارد؛ این مشاهده است که واقعیت را متعین می‌کند، نه واقعیت که مشاهده را. ناظر از تماشاگر به شریک ساختن بدل شد. سپس از سوی معرفت‌شناسی؛ تازه‌ترین ص

17 Jul 2026, 07:41 UTC≈808 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

✅آگهی گمشده ۳۰ میلیون جان فدا یکجا گم شدند اگر آنها را پیدا کردید سریعا برای دفاع از کشور به جنوب فرستاده شوند @Sahamnewsorg

9 Jul 2026, 18:26 UTC≈967 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

‏با توجه به حمله دیشب ایالات متحده به پلهای راه آهن در دو منطقه آق قلا و کاشمر (در مسیر مسافری مشهد)، اکنون با قطعیت میتوان گفت که بزرگترین اشتباه راهبردی ایران پس از آتش بس، تلاش برای عادیسازی روابط با امارات از طریق کانالهای امنیتی سطح بالا بوده است. اما چرا چنین ادعایی میکنیم؟ ‏ضربه به پل آق قلا که در میانه مسیر اینچه برون-گرگان-گرمسار قرار دارد، علاوه بر اینکه تصعید افقی (جغرافیایی) جنگ پس از توافق اسلام‌آباد محس

7 Jul 2026, 09:34 UTC≈508 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026

📝📝📝*واجبات خدا؛ واجبات مردم* ✍️رضا بابایی ✅یکی از اعضای دفتر استفتائات آیت الله العظمی خوئی(ره) در خاطراتش می‌نویسد: ایشان در جلسه‌ای به‌‌شوخی فرمودند: «ما دو گونه واجب داریم: آنچه خدا واجب کرده است و آنچه مردم واجب می‌دانند. اگر با واجبات خدا مخالفت کنید، چون خدا مهربان است، به بخشایش او امیدوار باشید. اما اگر با واجباتی مخالفت کنید که مردم آنها را واجب می‌دانند، اولا از همه چیز ساقط می‌شوید و ثانیا هیچ امیدی نداش

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @dastchean. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 794,784 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“دستچین” (@dastchean), 1,338 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dastchean.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.