Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Дарья Блохина

Channel

Дарья Блохина

@dasha_innuttzz

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

12,088subscribers

-23 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001590537165
TypeChannel
Username@dasha_innuttzz
Created3 July 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/dasha_innuttzz

Growth

12,06912,11312,0916 August 2026 — 12,111 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,113 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,103 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,099 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,103 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,098 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,092 subscribers14 August 2026 — 12,069 subscribers16 August 2026 — 12,088 subscribers12,0886 August 202616 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 10 days, net -23. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,062–12,120 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 02:2712,088+19
14 Aug 2026, 13:0512,069-23
12 Aug 2026, 03:2512,092-6
11 Aug 2026, 00:0412,098-5
9 Aug 2026, 23:3612,103+4
8 Aug 2026, 22:1112,099-4
7 Aug 2026, 22:5712,103-10
7 Aug 2026, 01:0412,113+2
6 Aug 2026, 06:3312,111first reading

Engagement

32 posts held, back to 27 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.9%
avg views ÷ 12,088 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,410
26 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.24%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
26
of 32 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held32 (27 June 202615 August 2026)
Views total62,556
Reactions total2,029
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 14:29 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
7m 57s
Average length
43s

Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,926 reactions across 32 posts, in 32 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,24342.5%
🔥71924.6%
💔2107.18%
😁1324.51%
🤣1093.73%
👏993.38%
❤‍🔥792.70%
👍702.39%
😢361.23%
🍌341.16%
😍280.957%
🥰220.752%
🍾200.684%
🙏190.649%
😱180.615%
💯120.41%
🤝120.41%
🥱120.41%
100.342%
💘100.342%
12 further kinds321.09%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 32 of the 32 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,926reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 32 most recent posts we hold, published 27 June 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
11
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 32 we hold a reading for · 16%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dasha_innuttzz. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 32 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 June 2026 to 15 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 07:01 UTC630 views85 reactions5 Starsread 15 August 2026
Video

Спасибо, Москва ♥️

50🔥15❤‍🔥14👍5🕊1

14 Aug 2026, 06:22 UTC≈1,200 views86 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Это я сказку пишу)))

43👍14😁10👏5🔥4🍾3😱3🍌2

13 Aug 2026, 20:24 UTC≈1,240 views41 reactionsread 15 August 2026

ГЛАВА XV Кроты Рыжего Леса Тем временем Панкрат принимал уже вторую ванну. — Исключительно потому, что первая вода остыла. — Конечно, Ваше Высочество, — сказала кикимора. Вдруг под ванной что-то заскреблось. Из пола появилась мордочка крота. Потом ещё одна. Потом третья. Панкрат вскочил. — Господа, я без штанов! Крот почтительно отвернулся. — Простите. — ГОВОРЯЩИЕ КРОТЫ?! — А маленький человек в ванной для Барби вас

26👏8😁4🍌1🍾1😱1

13 Aug 2026, 20:24 UTC916 views29 reactionsread 15 August 2026

ГЛАВА XII Прасковья отращивает ноги Тем временем кособокая старуха пришла в ужас. Панкрат мог рассказать Аврелии о ребёнке. А по причинам, известных преимущественно самой Прасковье, она считала, что этого пока нельзя допустить. — Я найду его раньше! — Как? — спросила Королева. Прасковья подняла юбку. Королева вскрикнула. — У тебя три ноги! — Сейчас будет больше. ПЛЮП. Четвёртая. ПЛЮП. Пятая. ПЛЮП. Шестая. Царевна Три

17👏6😁3🍾2🍌1

13 Aug 2026, 20:23 UTC744 views29 reactionsread 15 August 2026

ГЛАВА IX Прощение Северин нашёл Аврелию в дальней части пещеры. Она сидела среди листьев папоротника и чистотела. — Аврелия… Она посмотрела на него. — Я пришёл не просить вас забыть мои слова. Он опустился перед ней. — Потому что вы не обязаны забывать. Я хотел причинить вам боль. Не из-за синдрома. Не потому, что разлюбил. А потому, что сам чувствовал себя нелепым и недостойным вас. Аврелия долго молчала. — Это было

17👏6😁3🍌1🍾1😱1

13 Aug 2026, 20:22 UTC764 views30 reactionsread 15 August 2026

ЧАСТЬ ТРЕТЬЯ «Есть минуты, когда человеку остаётся только одно: довериться любви, фамильяру и хорошо наточенному секатору.» ГЛАВА VII Битва с Корневым Демоном У пещеры их уже ожидал Корневой Демон. Он поднялся из земли во всей своей мерзостной красе. Чёрные корни блестели от слизи. Кособокая старуха перекрестилась морковью. — Етить колотить. Вот это упругий влажный корнеплод. Командир отряда медленно повернулся к не

19👏6😁3🍌1🍾1

13 Aug 2026, 20:21 UTC767 views27 reactionsread 15 August 2026

ГЛАВА V Тот, у кого не было лица Аврелия бежала в лес. Она была слишком горда, чтобы плакать человеком, поэтому плакала лисой. Это было удобнее: никто не отличит слезу от росы на усах. Она пробиралась сквозь листья папоротника и заросли чистотела. И вдруг почувствовала мышь. Толстую. Нахальную. Совершенно не подозревавшую, что участвует в драматургии. Аврелия прыгнула. Мышь скрылась под корнем. Корень пошевелился. Пе

17👏6😁3🍌1

13 Aug 2026, 20:21 UTC848 views27 reactionsread 15 August 2026

ГЛАВА IV О невозможности спокойно целовать жену Аврелия любила Северина. Спокойно. Нежно. Без всякой арифметики. Но сам Северин всё больше сомневался в себе. Стоило Аврелии сесть к нему на колени, провести тонкими руками по его шее или подарить поцелуй в губы, возбуждение распахивало внутри него врата чрезвычайно невоспитанного ада. — Северин… — М-м? — Вы опять смотрите на меня так, будто намерены совершить безрассу

18👏5😁3🍌1

13 Aug 2026, 20:20 UTC877 views30 reactionsread 15 August 2026

— Я давно хотел предложить, но боялся отказа. — А того, что я превращаюсь в хищного зверя, вы не боитесь? Северин посмотрел на неё. — Вы видели себя? — Видела. — Тогда вопрос снят. ГЛАВА III Великий Овощной Бал Романтическую сцену прервал хруст. Из кустов выползла кособокая старуха в ночной рубашке и короне из репчатого лука. В руках она несла морковь невероятных размеров. Панкрат побледнел. — О боже, смотрите, что

20👏6😁3🍌1

13 Aug 2026, 20:20 UTC≈1,020 views34 reactionsread 15 August 2026

О молодом человеке, его соседке и пагубном влиянии кабачков на светскую беседу В одном городе, столь изысканном, что даже крысы там носили траурные ленты по четвергам, жил черноволосый юноша по имени Северин. Он был строен, бледен и обладал глазами человека, который либо прочёл слишком много запрещённых книг, либо слишком мало спал. Северин страдал двумя несчастьями. Первым было одиночество. Вторым — его прекрасная

22👏5😁5🍌2

13 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTC≈1,260 views76 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥4019👍7❤‍🔥6🥰3🥴1

10 Aug 2026, 07:13 UTC≈2,280 views126 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

70👏19😁13❤‍🔥11🔥7👍4🍌2

Showing the 12 most recent of 32 posts we hold for @dasha_innuttzz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

27 Jul 2026, 18:02 UTCAnonymous Poll3,400 voters approx.

Какую обложку запомните надолго?

  1. 1. Элли на маковом поле — Шлиссельбург19%
  2. 2. SALUKI — EUPHORIA36%
  3. 3. стёпа ч — Вот это13%
  4. 4. Сироткин — Тоже является частью вселенной15%
  5. 5. aikko — грейвейв16%
  6. 6. KOMMO, Daria Blokhina — Боевая единица10%
  7. 7. FLORA — ХИП-ХОП БОГЕМА5%
  8. 8. Settlers — Летучий корабль14%
  9. 9. Toxi$, Дора — ЗНАК31%

The shares total 159%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 32 most recent posts we hold, published 27 June 2026 to 15 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 111,532 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Дарья Блохина” (@dasha_innuttzz), 12,088 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dasha_innuttzz.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.