Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Bollywood Haweli 𓇻πŸ”₯

Channel

Bollywood Haweli 𓇻πŸ”₯

@das_18

On this record: Topic Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry

25,888subscribers

-1,311 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001320165524
TypeChannel
Username@das_18
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 β€” estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 October 2026
Measurements held35
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/das_18

Topic

Memes & entertainment β€” a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β€” it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

25,88827,25226,5706 August 2026 β€” 27,199 subscribers7 August 2026 β€” 27,226 subscribers8 August 2026 β€” 27,213 subscribers8 August 2026 β€” 27,227 subscribers10 August 2026 β€” 27,242 subscribers11 August 2026 β€” 27,252 subscribers12 August 2026 β€” 27,241 subscribers13 August 2026 β€” 27,244 subscribers15 August 2026 β€” 27,222 subscribers16 August 2026 β€” 27,217 subscribers17 August 2026 β€” 27,179 subscribers18 August 2026 β€” 27,157 subscribers19 August 2026 β€” 27,120 subscribers20 August 2026 β€” 27,112 subscribers22 August 2026 β€” 27,122 subscribers23 August 2026 β€” 27,089 subscribers25 August 2026 β€” 27,075 subscribers26 August 2026 β€” 27,063 subscribers27 August 2026 β€” 27,100 subscribers28 August 2026 β€” 27,106 subscribers29 August 2026 β€” 27,095 subscribers30 August 2026 β€” 27,047 subscribers31 August 2026 β€” 27,039 subscribers1 September 2026 β€” 26,992 subscribers2 September 2026 β€” 26,935 subscribers3 September 2026 β€” 26,904 subscribers5 September 2026 β€” 26,831 subscribers8 September 2026 β€” 26,683 subscribers11 September 2026 β€” 26,553 subscribers13 September 2026 β€” 26,462 subscribers14 September 2026 β€” 26,423 subscribers17 September 2026 β€” 26,373 subscribers19 September 2026 β€” 26,297 subscribers26 September 2026 β€” 26,068 subscribers4 October 2026 β€” 25,888 subscribers6 August 20264 October 2026
35 measurements spanning 59 days, net -1,311. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 25,683–27,457 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Oct 2026, 13:1825,888-180
26 Sept 2026, 06:3726,068-229
19 Sept 2026, 09:1526,297-76
17 Sept 2026, 01:2026,373-50
14 Sept 2026, 23:3926,423-39
13 Sept 2026, 05:5726,462-91
11 Sept 2026, 08:1526,553-130
8 Sept 2026, 10:3626,683-148
5 Sept 2026, 08:2026,831-73
3 Sept 2026, 13:5926,904-31
2 Sept 2026, 05:4726,935-57
1 Sept 2026, 03:4826,992-47
31 Aug 2026, 06:4727,039-8
30 Aug 2026, 06:0627,047-48
29 Aug 2026, 05:1427,095-11
28 Aug 2026, 07:2527,106+6
27 Aug 2026, 05:4827,100+37
26 Aug 2026, 02:4427,063-12
25 Aug 2026, 02:3827,075-14
23 Aug 2026, 15:5527,089first reading

Engagement

76 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 77 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR Β· 30 days
5.83%
avg views Γ· 25,888 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,510
24 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.97%
reactions Γ· views Β· ER floor
Posts in window
24
of 76 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· views β€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 3 October 2026
Posts held76 (3 August 2026 – 3 October 2026)
Views total36,223
Reactions total715
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface β€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken4 Oct 2026, 05:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than β€œcorrecting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β€” 8.12K, 3.7M β€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 47s
Average length
14s

Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β€” not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no β‰ˆ mark.

Reaction mix

2,719 reactions across 75 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
πŸ”₯1,11040.8%
❀75127.6%
πŸ’‹49618.2%
❀‍πŸ”₯1334.89%
🍾511.88%
🀩471.73%
😱421.54%
πŸ₯°341.25%
πŸ“200.736%
πŸ†110.405%
⚑90.331%
😍80.294%
πŸ’―40.147%
πŸŽ‰30.11%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β€” πŸ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β€” 4.34K, 1.2M β€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 75 of the 76 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post β€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β€” those same posts carry 2,719 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by β€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 76 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 3 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Oct 2026, 04:27 UTCβ‰ˆ1,020 views32 reactionsread 4 October 2026
Photo

Follow @Ankita_Singh_7 for more πŸ‘„

πŸ”₯16πŸ’‹12❀4

3 Oct 2026, 03:56 UTCβ‰ˆ1,100 views26 reactionsread 4 October 2026
Photo

Yesha Sagar πŸ’‹

πŸ”₯12πŸ’‹5❀4❀‍πŸ”₯4🍾1

2 Oct 2026, 12:04 UTCβ‰ˆ1,520 views33 reactionsread 4 October 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

πŸ’‹14πŸ”₯7❀6❀‍πŸ”₯6

2 Oct 2026, 02:39 UTCβ‰ˆ1,720 views42 reactionsread 4 October 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❀18πŸ”₯10πŸ’‹8❀‍πŸ”₯6

30 Sept 2026, 16:57 UTCβ‰ˆ2,370 views31 reactionsread 4 October 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

❀18πŸ”₯13

29 Sept 2026, 02:18 UTCβ‰ˆ2,600 views63 reactionsread 2 October 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

πŸ’‹33πŸ”₯15❀11πŸ“4

29 Sept 2026, 01:51 UTCβ‰ˆ2,410 views21 reactionsread 2 October 2026
Photo

Shalini Pandey ⚑ @AvneetKaur7 @ActressHaweli7

πŸ”₯14❀‍πŸ”₯5😱2

29 Sept 2026, 01:49 UTCβ‰ˆ1,900 views19 reactionsread 2 October 2026
Photo

Alia Bhatt πŸ”₯ @AvneetKaur7 @ActressHaweli7

❀‍πŸ”₯9πŸ”₯8😱2

29 Sept 2026, 01:49 UTCβ‰ˆ1,450 views24 reactionsread 1 October 2026
Photo

Jonita Gandhi πŸ’‹ @AvneetKaur7 @ActressHaweli7

πŸ”₯11❀‍πŸ”₯10πŸ“3

28 Sept 2026, 02:38 UTC746 views12 reactionsread 28 September 2026
Photo

Kareena Kapoor 🀍 πŸ’‹ @AvneetKaur7 @ActressHaweli7

❀10πŸ”₯1πŸ₯°1

28 Sept 2026, 02:28 UTC567 views14 reactionsread 28 September 2026
Photo

The Alia Bhatt show πŸ”₯ @AvneetKaur7 @ActressHaweli7

❀7πŸ”₯6🍾1

27 Sept 2026, 01:13 UTCβ‰ˆ1,620 views38 reactionsread 28 September 2026
Photo

Disha Patani πŸ‘„ @AvneetKaur7 @ActressHaweli7

πŸ”₯25πŸ’‹7❀5🍾1

Showing the 12 most recent of 76 posts we hold for @das_18. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels β€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β€” the β€œNamed by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 October 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œBollywood Haweli 𓇻πŸ”₯” (@das_18), 25,888 subscribers as measured 4 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/das_18.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.