Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Дарья Дубешко | ИИ ˚ AI | Чат-боты | Обучение

Channel

Дарья Дубешко | ИИ ˚ AI | Чат-боты | Обучение

@daryadubeshko

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

899subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001952523973
TypeChannel
Username@daryadubeshko
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/daryadubeshko

Growth

899900899.57 August 2026 — 900 subscribers7 August 2026 — 900 subscribers14 August 2026 — 899 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 899–900 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 07:34899-1
7 Aug 2026, 10:32900no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:19900first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 19 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

248 reactions across 10 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 15.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥3815.3%
🙏3815.3%
custom 52670310434870518843714.9%
custom 5328014489554002336239.27%
🥰187.26%
💯166.45%
👀145.65%
😁124.84%
🕊83.23%
🤝83.23%
custom 539119100605184048252.02%
52.02%
🤔52.02%
custom 598095371015763254541.61%
custom 534136954433202606631.21%
custom 521330550803478338420.806%
custom 536633914416117360820.806%
custom 541583804095215739720.806%
custom 610947614831437719320.806%
20.806%
3 further kinds41.61%

Custom emoji. 9 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 248reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 19 January 2026 to 8 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
23
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 10 we hold a reading for · 40%
Most on one post
9
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @daryadubeshko. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 10 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 January 2026 to 8 March 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
10.0%
1 of 10 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
813
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
1,050
over 9 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2VtzqwQHegb123 January 202623 January 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 19 January 2026 to 8 March 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

8 Mar 2026, 17:18 UTC≈1,620 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Мы подверглись тюльпанической атаке!!! 🌷🌷🌷🤣 Девочки, дорогие мои и любимые! Мы с Евой поздравляем вас с 8 марта, Международным женским днём 🤗 Мое женское пожелание: Пусть мужчины выполняют все желания — даже те, о которых ты ещё не придумала! Аминь 🙏😄

🥰13custom 53280144895540023366😁4🙏2🕊1

4 Mar 2026, 12:47 UTC≈1,350 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🙏12🕊7custom 53911910060518404822custom 61094761483143771932custom 53280144895540023361

4 Mar 2026, 04:38 UTC≈1,250 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

👀62custom 53663391441611736082custom 54158380409521573971

3 Mar 2026, 12:57 UTC≈1,170 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Спаси и Сохрани ☦️ Кому контакт ? Взяли бы такой заказ ?

😁8👀6custom 59809537101576325454custom 52133055080347833842custom 59809306332983500511

27 Feb 2026, 16:46 UTC≈1,050 views27 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Тем временем Ева выросла 🙈 Сегодня были первая серия программы «Гороскопы» с ее участием ♏️ У этой девчонки есть свой инст Сейчас ходим в модельную школу и медиа школу 🤪 👉🏼 Только посмотрите на портфолио красотки http://evagallery.tilda.ws/portfolio

🔥16🥰5💯3custom 53280144895540023363

27 Feb 2026, 09:11 UTC812 views21 reactions9 Starsread 7 August 2026
Voice message

В этом подкасте я голосом продолжаю ту историю, о которой написала в посте 🆘 Рассказываю, как всё начало раскачиваться ещё с прошлой осени, как я жила в режиме «больше, сильнее, масштаб», как пыталась вывезти и доказать — и в какой момент внутри случился надлом. "...бежим, бежим, быстрее, выше и сильнее.. А куда и для чего - это уже другой вопрос 😆..." Говорю про болезненный развод, про желание доказать бывшему му

🙏13custom 53911910060518404823👀2custom 532801448955400233621

26 Feb 2026, 15:37 UTC951 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

О да! Прозреть можно только на пустой кишечник, хорошенько обосравшись🤣🤣🤣 Да простите меня эстеты, если вы это читаете!😊😭🤣

custom 53280144895540023365💯1🙏1

26 Feb 2026, 15:12 UTC≈1,010 views57 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Я провалилась. И впервые не хочу это скрывать 🙈 Я долго думала, писать это или нет… сегодня увидела пост у Андрея, подумала «это знак! Всё есть опыт» СПОЙЛЕР: этот пост я пишу чтобы поделиться. Знаю, что не я одна переживаю сейчас кризис. При этом хочу поделиться своей историей ❤️ Так вот, можно было бы сделать вид, что всё как обычно: проекты, клиенты, движение, планы. Но если честно — последние два месяца были д

custom 526703104348705188429🙏10🤝8custom 53280144895540023366custom 53413695443320260663custom 54158380409521573971

23 Jan 2026, 07:07 UTC813 views26 reactions5 Starsread 7 August 2026
Advertisementerid 2VtzqwQHegbForwarded from @yugmarketingVideo

❗️ Повышение НДС — приговор слабым моделям продаж. Бизнесы закрываются не из-за отсутствия клиентов, а из-за потерь в заявках и мертвой базы. 📊 На видео — рабочая модель 2026: до 30% конверсии в диалог за счет другой логики работы с заявками. Это не магия)) Это скорость, работа с базой и четкая цель в переписке. 👉 Бесплатно покажем механизм на консультации 👉 Обзорное видео модели продаж с ИИ — в закрытом чате Ре

🔥13custom 526703104348705188464😱2custom 54719849973615233021

19 Jan 2026, 09:59 UTC801 views28 reactions8 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Разбираем актуальные ниши для внедрения ИИ 🔥🚀 Эту карусель я сделала не для того, чтобы перечислить «топ-ниш». С этим в интернете и так всё хорошо 😄 Проблема, которую я вижу на практике, в другом: люди ищут правильную нишу, вместо того чтобы понять правильную задачу. Один и тот же ИИ может: ❌ не дать вообще никакого эффекта в одном бизнесе 📈 и дать ощутимый рост в другом, даже в той же самой сфере. Разница почти

💯12🔥9🤔5custom 52670310434870518842

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @daryadubeshko. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 417,379 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Дарья Дубешко | ИИ ˚ AI | Чат-боты | Обучение” (@daryadubeshko), 899 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/daryadubeshko.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.