Channel
@daruosh93
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 October 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004378185447 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @daruosh93 |
| Created | 5 October 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 7 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/daruosh93 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Oct 2026, 13:49 | 3 | no change |
| 7 Oct 2026, 21:22 | 3 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 5 October 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 6 (5 October 2026 – 5 October 2026) |
| Views total | 1,280 |
| Reactions total | 1,776 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Oct 2026, 21:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
1,776 reactions across 5 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 13.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 6048725674158462437 | 238 | 13.4% | |
| custom 6051065297463417420 | 236 | 13.3% | |
| custom 6048534101437191636 | 231 | 13.0% | |
| custom 6048511393945097632 | 229 | 12.9% | |
| custom 6048872033759008192 | 226 | 12.7% | |
| custom 6048714232365586738 | 222 | 12.5% | |
| custom 6050720214021051999 | 208 | 11.7% | |
| custom 6048806887695063198 | 186 | 10.5% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,776 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 5 October 2026 to 5 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The more you do for people, the more they expect from you.
custom 605106529746341742057custom 604851139394509763246custom 604872567415846243746custom 604853410143719163645custom 604880688769506319842custom 605072021402105199942custom 604871423236558673839custom 604887203375900819239
Sometimes they just learn how to hide their true behavior
custom 604851139394509763252custom 604872567415846243752custom 604853410143719163648custom 605072021402105199945custom 605106529746341742045custom 604887203375900819242custom 604871423236558673839custom 604880688769506319832
✦ Lost in the Blue Love is not a sudden flame, but an ocean that quietly expands until it fills every corner of the heart. Falling for you felt like stepping into an endless blue horizon, where the air is still and every wave carries a promise of unconditional warmth. In the vastness of your presence, I found the only place where my heart truly belongs
custom 604872567415846243752custom 605106529746341742051custom 604887203375900819247custom 604851139394509763246custom 604853410143719163646custom 604871423236558673843custom 604880688769506319834custom 605072021402105199934
When you understand the essence of people, then you understand what they are .
custom 604871423236558673857custom 604851139394509763250custom 604853410143719163648custom 604887203375900819244custom 604880688769506319841custom 604872567415846243739custom 605072021402105199938custom 605106529746341742036
𝑴𝒂𝒚𝒃𝒆 𝑰 𝒄𝒂𝒏’𝒕 𝒑𝒓𝒐𝒎𝒊𝒔𝒆 𝒚𝒐𝒖 𝒂 𝒑𝒆𝒓𝒇𝒆𝒄𝒕 𝒇𝒖𝒕𝒖𝒓𝒆, 𝒃𝒖𝒕 𝑰 𝒄𝒂𝒏 𝒑𝒓𝒐𝒎𝒊𝒔𝒆 𝒕𝒉𝒂𝒕 𝒎𝒚 𝒇𝒆𝒆𝒍𝒊𝒏𝒈𝒔 𝒂𝒓𝒆 𝒓𝒆𝒂𝒍. 𝑨𝒔 𝒍𝒐𝒏𝒈 𝒂𝒔 𝑰 𝒉𝒂𝒗𝒆 𝒚𝒐𝒖, 𝑰’𝒍𝒍 𝒂𝒍𝒘𝒂𝒚𝒔 𝒉𝒂𝒗𝒆 𝒂 𝒓𝒆𝒂𝒔𝒐𝒏 𝒕𝒐 𝒔𝒎𝒊𝒍𝒆. 𝑨𝒏𝒅 𝒊𝒇 𝒍𝒐𝒗𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒚𝒐𝒖 𝒎𝒆𝒂𝒏𝒔 𝒄𝒉𝒐𝒐𝒔𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒚𝒐𝒖 𝒆𝒗𝒆𝒓𝒚 𝒔𝒊𝒏𝒈𝒍𝒆 𝒅𝒂𝒚, 𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒏 𝑰 𝒉𝒐𝒑𝒆 𝑰 𝒈𝒆𝒕 𝒕𝒐 𝒄𝒉𝒐𝒐𝒔𝒆 𝒚𝒐𝒖 𝒇𝒐𝒓 𝒂 𝒗𝒆𝒓𝒚 𝒍𝒐𝒏𝒈 𝒕𝒊𝒎𝒆.
custom 604887203375900819254custom 604872567415846243749custom 605072021402105199949custom 605106529746341742047custom 604853410143719163644custom 604871423236558673844custom 604880688769506319837custom 604851139394509763235
Channel created
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @daruosh93. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“داریوش” (@daruosh93), 3 subscribers as measured 12 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/daruosh93.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.