Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for «Даруль-Фитра»

Channel

«Даруль-Фитра»

@darul_fitra

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Cite this entry

2,499subscribers

-29 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002005866824
TypeChannel
Username@darul_fitra
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/darul_fitra

Growth

2,4982,5282,5137 August 2026 — 2,528 subscribers8 August 2026 — 2,527 subscribers11 August 2026 — 2,522 subscribers15 August 2026 — 2,520 subscribers18 August 2026 — 2,514 subscribers21 August 2026 — 2,506 subscribers24 August 2026 — 2,502 subscribers27 August 2026 — 2,500 subscribers30 August 2026 — 2,498 subscribers2 September 2026 — 2,499 subscribers2,4997 August 20262 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 26 days, net -29. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,494–2,533 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Sept 2026, 14:492,499+1
30 Aug 2026, 22:582,498-2
27 Aug 2026, 16:442,500-2
24 Aug 2026, 21:272,502-4
21 Aug 2026, 10:272,506-8
18 Aug 2026, 19:142,514-6
15 Aug 2026, 08:372,520-2
11 Aug 2026, 21:172,522-5
8 Aug 2026, 11:412,527-1
7 Aug 2026, 14:192,528first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 23 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 29s
Average length
50s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

792 reactions across 17 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💯35144.3%
👍22127.9%
8911.2%
😁364.55%
🔥324.04%
custom 5238135027505580792243.03%
🤯222.78%
custom 537982959778320814691.14%
🤝60.758%
👏10.126%
🤔10.126%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 792 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 23 March 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 17 we hold a reading for · 12%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @darul_fitra. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 March 2026 to 30 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2026, 17:13 UTC876 views60 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Также советую братьям, планирующим жениться на девушках с мед образованием учесть следующие факторы: - ваша жена никогда не будет вашей, если она будет работать в медицине. Она будет уставать, перерабатывать и пахать как лошадь, а вы будете терпеть. О нормальной жене, которая будет вас ждать полная сил и энергии, в чистом доме с едой - МОЖЕТЕ ЗАБЫТЬ! - если вы запретите ей работать, она скорее всего вам откажет, тк

💯33👍17🤝64

30 Jul 2026, 16:56 UTC876 views69 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

«ЕСЛИ ХОЧЕШЬ ЖЕНИТЬСЯ НА ДЕВУШКЕ-МЕДИКЕ, ТЫ НЕ ИМЕЕШЬ ПРАВА ЕЙ МЕШАТЬ РАБОТАТЬ И РАЗВИВАТЬСЯ, иначе это будет грех» Именно с таким посылом обратилась данная инстаблогерша к мужчинам, пытаясь это еще очень криво-косо обосновать с религиозной точки зрения, наговаривая тем самым на религию Всевышнего. И скольких бед мы могли бы избежать, если выставляющие себя напоказ женщины перестали бы умничать и говорить о шариате

💯42👍1610🔥1

26 Jun 2026, 16:04 UTC≈2,700 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Данной хутбе более 10 лет. Однако его актуальность растет с каждым годом. Очень много записей своих проповедей я растерял. Иногда вот нахожу и выкладываю

13👍1

26 Jun 2026, 16:01 UTC≈2,540 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

Пятничная проповедь: «Страх бедности. Истинная бедность в исламе»

👍1510💯2

9 Jun 2026, 16:56 UTC≈3,040 views66 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Video

«МОИ ДРУЗЬЯ ДОЛЖНЫ ВИДЕТЬ МОЮ ЖЕНУ» Когда у «мужчины» атрофированно чувство ревности и ему плевать, что его жену могут видеть чужие мужчины - ТО ЕМУ ЧТО ТО ОБЪЯСНЯТЬ ДАЛЬШЕ СМЫСЛА НЕТ. За все время своей деятельности я общался только с несколькими такими экземплярами, чьи жены красились и вели инсту. И всем им я задавал один и тот же вопрос: - тебя реально не напрягает, что твою жену может увидеть любой мужчина в

💯5012👍4

19 May 2026, 17:34 UTC≈2,970 views51 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

К большому сожалению большинство современных мужчин-опекунов, даже из числа соблюдающих мусульман, попало под современную пропаганду «сильной и независимой женщины», толкая своих дочерей на этот путь «бизнес леди», по факту же ломая им жизни и делая из них непригодных для семейной жизни мусульманок. Все это происходит из за невежества мужчин, которые не понимают, какие роли по шариату у мужа и жены должны быть, и ка

💯30👍11🔥64

25 Apr 2026, 19:57 UTC≈3,250 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

🎙️Пятничная проповедь: «Мужество в исламе»

custom 53798295977832081469🔥53👍1

30 Mar 2026, 11:54 UTC≈4,140 views52 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Потом она выкладывает видео про… «БАРАКАТ ДУШИ» под американский рэп «Gangsters paradise» как переводится «Гангстерский рай» И в комментариях такие же как и она женщины в хиджабах аплодируют ей в том, как она по факту хорошо поиздевалась над религией.

💯29🤯12👍8😁21

30 Mar 2026, 11:45 UTC≈3,090 views44 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Разукрашенная инстапсихологиня в мужской одежде, выставляющая себя напоказ, на публику перед такими же как и она, рассказывает про…. «БАРАКАТ В ДУШЕ»….

😁23👍9🤯6custom 52381350275055807925🤔1

26 Mar 2026, 18:41 UTC≈2,860 views43 reactionsread 7 August 2026

ВАЖНОЕ ПРИМЕЧАНИЕ: Тут страница не про личности и тем более не про чьи-то семейные отношения. Я когда публикую какой-то скрин, НАМЕРЕННО ЗАМАЗЫВАЮ НИКИ, тк я не преследую обсуждать кого-то конкретно. Я тут обсуждаю идеи, взгляды, ценности, а не людей. Подобные скрины являются просто наглядной этому иллюстрацией. Поэтому просьба в комментах не переходить на личности и ТЕМ БОЛЕЕ НЕ РАССКАЗЫВАТЬ НАМ, кто там была з

👍365🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @darul_fitra. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“«Даруль-Фитра»” (@darul_fitra), 2,499 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/darul_fitra.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.