Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Дарми и Море

@darmioff

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

2,117subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002980188454
TypeChannel
Username@darmioff
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/darmioff

Growth

2,1172,1202,118.57 August 2026 — 2,120 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,120 subscribers11 August 2026 — 2,117 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,117–2,120 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 01:232,117-3
7 Aug 2026, 14:482,120no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:482,120first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 15 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
39.9%
avg views ÷ 2,117 subscribers
Avg views / post
845
1 post measured
Reaction rate
31.8%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 9 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026
Posts held9 (15 April 202631 July 2026)
Views total845
Reactions total269
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 14:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
17s
Average length
17s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,910 reactions across 9 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,28444.1%
💋44815.4%
❤‍🔥39413.5%
🔥37813.0%
🍓1585.43%
💘1023.51%
🥰762.61%
👍120.412%
🎉110.378%
🐳90.309%
👏90.309%
💯70.241%
😁70.241%
🍌30.103%
😭30.103%
20.069%
🌭20.069%
🕊10.034%
😈10.034%
😢10.034%
2 further kinds20.069%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,910reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 15 April 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 13:10 UTC845 views269 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

"Есть в этом мире места, которые на картах просто не значатся"

❤‍🔥18539💋21🔥16💘5🎉1👏1🥰1

22 Jun 2026, 09:42 UTC≈2,750 views363 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ОНЕЕЕЕЕТ, этот гиперактивный чертёнок опять сбежал! 😭 Поймайте кто-нибудь, пожалуйста...

242🔥56💋27🥰17💘7❤‍🔥6👍3🎉2

12 Jun 2026, 09:00 UTC≈3,140 views268 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Не можем не поделиться милейшим фанатским эдитом по Дарми от: @Yasha44_44 ✨ 😭❤

🔥16552💘28❤‍🔥12😭32👍2🥰2

5 Jun 2026, 10:28 UTC≈3,410 views250 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ВЫ НЕВЕРОЯТНЫ Именно эти слова всякий раз приходят нам в голову после просмотра ваших фанартов! 😂 Спасибо что в ожидании новостей от нас создаёте такие прекрасные работы и делитесь ими ❤️ Лул ✨ • Лавочка Воланчика • Ginler • Arsilike • Энимо • Барбара Клин • Олеся Суходеева • Artbroshka ⭐️P. S. И хотим объявить, что мы уже начали отсылать ТЗ художникам и аниматорам, прошедшим отбор. Но если Вы не получили от на

💋13378🔥18🥰5🎉4🐳4❤‍🔥3👍2

25 May 2026, 12:46 UTC≈2,810 views329 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

В дверь стучится жаркое лето 🔥 Самое время обзавестись вентилятором!

225💋39🥰35❤‍🔥11💘6🔥6🍓3🍌2

13 May 2026, 11:25 UTC≈3,700 views302 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Однажды в цепкие лапы Дарми попала морская раковина 🐚 Она была необычайно красива, переливаясь, слово осколки радуги. Таких девочка ещё не встречала. Даже в давние времена, когда мир ещё пел старыми песнями ветра, морские глубины не видали подобных диковинок. Старики говорят, что эти раковины сами выбирают своего носителя, в один прекрасный день просто появившись в его жизни. Такие часто попадают в руки путешествен

🍓15489🔥27❤‍🔥13🥰6💋5👏4🎉3

26 Apr 2026, 10:31 UTC≈3,740 views415 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

"В глазах ребенка нет семи чудес света. Их там семь миллионов" © Уолт Стрейтифф

288❤‍🔥74💘26🔥12💋4🥰3🌭2👏2

21 Apr 2026, 10:04 UTC≈3,780 views364 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Ну не могли мы пройти мимо такого тренда :) Как думаете, на что смотрят?

💋208❤‍🔥87🔥3318😁7💘3💯3🥰3

15 Apr 2026, 09:00 UTC≈4,190 views350 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

"Находка" Винтаж - дело хорошее. Дарми тоже так считает. А вот Капи похоже будет спорить... #comix@darmioff

253🔥45💘25💋10🐳5🥰4❤‍🔥3👍2

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @darmioff. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 889,392 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Дарми и Море” (@darmioff), 2,117 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/darmioff.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.