Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 3 other registered channels. This entry also sits inside a group of 6 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 49 of the 49 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 90 comparable posts for this entry, running 3 August 2026 to 25 September 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Of the group of 6 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @gavepuldar. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Channels linked by matching posts
This channel is in a group of 6 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
62 measurements spanning 95 days, net -8,168. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 33,944–44,562 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 62
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Nov 2026, 21:58
35,169
-115
10 Nov 2026, 02:21
35,284
-105
8 Nov 2026, 15:51
35,389
-105
7 Nov 2026, 07:41
35,494
-79
6 Nov 2026, 08:09
35,573
-92
5 Nov 2026, 09:19
35,665
-77
4 Nov 2026, 07:41
35,742
-58
3 Nov 2026, 10:06
35,800
-46
2 Nov 2026, 11:10
35,846
-79
1 Nov 2026, 12:26
35,925
-93
31 Oct 2026, 14:00
36,018
-101
30 Oct 2026, 13:59
36,119
-78
29 Oct 2026, 10:45
36,197
-78
28 Oct 2026, 09:56
36,275
-77
27 Oct 2026, 11:06
36,352
-78
26 Oct 2026, 07:47
36,430
-86
25 Oct 2026, 05:48
36,516
-82
24 Oct 2026, 04:28
36,598
-97
23 Oct 2026, 05:19
36,695
-84
22 Oct 2026, 06:56
36,779
first reading
Engagement
93 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 181 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 93 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
380
Videos
4
Links
152
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
24 reactions across 16 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 79.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
19
79.2%
🕊
3
12.5%
👍
1
4.17%
🥰
1
4.17%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 93 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 24 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 93 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 25 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📈 نوسان قیمت بهتنهایی خطر نیست.
📌 ریسک واقعی وقتی شروع میشه که ندونیم چی خریدیم، چرا خریدیم و چه زمانی باید نگهش داریم یا بفروشیمش.
✅🔻وقتی شناخت کافی داشته باشید، نوسان فقط بخشی از مسیره؛ نه دلیلی برای تصمیم های احساسی.
💸 @darkob_trade
📌 بازار به میزان تلاش شما پاداش نمیده. مهم کیفیت تصمیم های شماست!
📌 ممکنه ساعتها تحلیل کنید، اما در نهایت یک تصمیم احساسی همه چیز رو خراب کنه.
✅ تفاوت تریدر حرفهای در اینه که در لحظه حساس، منطقی و منظم تصمیم میگیره.
💸 @darkob_trade
🚨 خبر مهم برای Avalanche 🪙🇦🇪
⚪️امارات قصد داره Avalanche (AVAX) رو وارد سیستم هویت دیجیتال ملی UAE PASS کنه. اقدامی که میتونه AVAX حدود 11 میلیون کاربر جدید وارد شبکه کنه. 🪙
✅ اگر این ادغام نهایی بشه، میتونه یکی از بزرگترین نمونه های پذیرش واقعی و دولتی AVAX تا امروز باشه. 🔥
💸 @darkob_trade
⚪️ ورود سرمایه به تمام ETF های اسپات کریپتو!
⚪️ در ۱۴ سپتامبر، هر چهار ETF با جریان مثبت همراه شدن:
🪙 بیتکوین: 160.04 میلیون دلار
🪙 اتریوم: 121.02 میلیون دلار
🪙 سولانا: 11.01 میلیون دلار
🪙 ریپل: 11.26 میلیون دلار
⚪️مجموع ورودی خالص به بیش از 303 میلیون دلا رسید که نشانهای مثبت از بازگشت تقاضای نهادی به بازار محسوب میشه.
💸 @darkob_trade
⚪️ احتمال پایان بازار خرسی بیتکوین افزایش یافته 🪙
⚪️ افزایش شدید حجم معاملات اسپات و فیوچرز دائمی در ماه آگوست، همزمان با رشد 24% بیتکوین، میتونه نشانه ای از یک شکست واضح از فاز بازار خرسی باشه.
✅ اگر حجم معاملات در سطوح بالا باقی بمونه، این حرکت میتونه تأیید قویتری برای تغییر روند بازار باشه. 💰
💸 @darkob_trade
🪙 تحلیل هفتگی بیتکوین
⚪️ بیتکوین بعد از ریجکت شدن از MA50 هفتگی، هفته را با افت 4.38% بست؛ اما هنوز حمایت مهم 75.500 دلار حفظ شده.
📌 این هفته دو رویداد مهم زیر ذرهبین بازارن:
🔗 15 سپتامبر: رأیگیری قانون CLARITY
🔗 16 سپتامبر: تصمیم نرخ بهره فدرال رزرو
⚪️افزایش 25 واحدی نرخ بهره تا حد زیادی در قیمتها لحاظ شده؛ بنابراین سورپرایز اصلی میتونه توقف افزایش نرخ باشد که احتمالاً به نفع بیتکوین تمام میشه.
💰 سطح کلیدی: 7…
⚪️ ترید یعنی کار با احتمالات، نه پیشبینی قطعی آینده.
📌 هیچ معاملهای تضمین شده نیست؛ کاری که از دست ما ورمیاد، داشتن سناریو، مدیریت ریسک و واکنش درست به چیزیه که بازار نشون میده.
✅ تریدر حرفهای دنبال قطعیت نیست؛ دنبال برتری آماری و تصمیم درسته.
💸 @darkob_trade
📌 در بازار همیشه لازم نیست پوزیشن داشته باشید.
💰 گاهی بهترین تصمیم اینه که هیچ کاری نکنید و منتظر بمونید تا شرایط مناسب مهیا بشه. خرید، فروش و حتی دور موندن از بازار؛ هر سه میتونن تصمیم درست باشن.
✅ تریدر حرفهای میدونه چه زمانی وارد شه، چه زمانی خارج شه و چه زمانی فقط صبر کنه.
💸 @darkob_trade
🪙 اتریوم از مثلث صعودی 21 روزه خارج شد! 🔥
⚪️ اتریوم بالاخره مقاومت الگوی Ascending Triangle رو شکست و حالا در صورت تثبیت بالای محدوده شکست، مسیر برای ادامه حرکت صعودی بازتر خواهد شد. 📈
⚪️ اهداف بعدی: 2,800 تا 3,400 دلار
✅ نکته کلیدی فعلاً حفظ سطح شکسته. برگشت و تثبیت دوباره زیر اون میتونه اعتبار این بریکاوت رو کاهش بده.
💸 @darkob_trade
🚨 محدوده حیاتی بیتکوین: 72 تا 73 هزار دلار 🪙
💰 طبق تحلیل CryptoQuant، حفظ قیمت بالای این محدوده میتونه نشانهای از شروع دوباره انباشت سرمایهگذاران نهادی و تقویت روند صعودی باشه. 📈
💰 اما از دست رفتن حمایت $72K–$73K میتونه ساختار فعلی بازار رو تضعیف کنه و فشار فروش رو افزایش بده.
✅ فعلاً این محدوده یکی از مهمترین سطوحیه که باید زیر نظر گرفت. 👀
💸 @darkob_trade
📌 نوسان همیشه به معنی خطر نیست. گاهی اوقات همون چیزیه که فرصت میسازه. 👀
🔗 سرمایهگذار باهوش در ارزانی خرید میکنه و در گرونی میفروشه و از همین نوسانات به عنوان فرصت استفاده میکنه. 💰
💸 @darkob_trade
🔥 اوپن اینترست آلتکوینها به بالاترین سطح از دسامبر 2024 رسیده!
⚪️حتی از سطح 10 اکتبر هم بالاتر رفته؛ یعنی حجم بالایی از پوزیشن های اهرمی وارد بازار شده. 👀
⚠️ تاریخ نشون داده وقتی اهرم بیش از حد بالا میره، احتمال لیکوییدیشن سنگین و نوسانات شدید هم بیشتر میشه. 📈
❗️حواستون به بازار باشه... دفعه قبل یادتونه چه اتفاقی افتاد؟ 💥
💸 @darkob_trade
Showing the 12 most recent of 93 posts we hold for @darkob_trade. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@darkob_trade named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@darkob_trare named in 19 posts, 6 September 2026 – 29 September 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
᎓𝖯𝖾𝗍𝗎𝗇𝗂𝖺🌙 @ThePetunia · 402 (as read 29 August 2026)#64
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 29 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
TROON🔷محسن ترون @TROON · 1,370,311 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 8 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“آرمان | هوش مصنوعی” (@darkob_trade), 35,169 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/darkob_trade.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.