Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Lenerox | Arlene Lee

Channel

Lenerox | Arlene Lee

@daritocatiktok

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

17,739subscribers

-5,891 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001870825431
TypeChannel
Username@daritocatiktok
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded14 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 November 2026
Measurements held56
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/daritocatiktok

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

17,73923,63020,684.514 August 2026 — 23,630 subscribers15 August 2026 — 23,604 subscribers16 August 2026 — 23,566 subscribers17 August 2026 — 23,483 subscribers18 August 2026 — 23,446 subscribers19 August 2026 — 23,338 subscribers20 August 2026 — 23,305 subscribers21 August 2026 — 23,235 subscribers23 August 2026 — 23,177 subscribers24 August 2026 — 23,122 subscribers25 August 2026 — 23,088 subscribers26 August 2026 — 23,048 subscribers27 August 2026 — 23,001 subscribers28 August 2026 — 22,977 subscribers29 August 2026 — 22,141 subscribers30 August 2026 — 21,828 subscribers31 August 2026 — 21,572 subscribers1 September 2026 — 21,447 subscribers2 September 2026 — 21,265 subscribers4 September 2026 — 21,138 subscribers6 September 2026 — 20,932 subscribers9 September 2026 — 20,538 subscribers11 September 2026 — 20,285 subscribers13 September 2026 — 20,041 subscribers15 September 2026 — 19,814 subscribers17 September 2026 — 19,683 subscribers26 September 2026 — 19,423 subscribers4 October 2026 — 19,063 subscribers9 October 2026 — 18,869 subscribers13 October 2026 — 18,658 subscribers14 October 2026 — 18,577 subscribers15 October 2026 — 18,552 subscribers16 October 2026 — 18,510 subscribers17 October 2026 — 18,465 subscribers18 October 2026 — 18,422 subscribers19 October 2026 — 18,397 subscribers20 October 2026 — 18,375 subscribers22 October 2026 — 18,336 subscribers23 October 2026 — 18,310 subscribers23 October 2026 — 18,261 subscribers24 October 2026 — 18,240 subscribers25 October 2026 — 18,208 subscribers26 October 2026 — 18,196 subscribers27 October 2026 — 18,163 subscribers28 October 2026 — 18,141 subscribers29 October 2026 — 18,125 subscribers30 October 2026 — 18,101 subscribers31 October 2026 — 18,063 subscribers1 November 2026 — 18,035 subscribers2 November 2026 — 17,997 subscribers3 November 2026 — 17,986 subscribers4 November 2026 — 17,947 subscribers5 November 2026 — 17,883 subscribers6 November 2026 — 17,856 subscribers7 November 2026 — 17,811 subscribers8 November 2026 — 17,739 subscribers14 August 20268 November 2026
56 measurements spanning 87 days, net -5,891. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,855–24,514 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 56
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Nov 2026, 21:1017,739-72
7 Nov 2026, 12:4117,811-45
6 Nov 2026, 13:5817,856-27
5 Nov 2026, 16:5717,883-64
4 Nov 2026, 14:4117,947-39
3 Nov 2026, 15:5817,986-11
2 Nov 2026, 16:1617,997-38
1 Nov 2026, 17:3618,035-28
31 Oct 2026, 14:4518,063-38
30 Oct 2026, 16:3118,101-24
29 Oct 2026, 16:3018,125-16
28 Oct 2026, 19:1818,141-22
27 Oct 2026, 20:2518,163-33
26 Oct 2026, 18:1518,196-12
25 Oct 2026, 21:3118,208-32
24 Oct 2026, 23:3618,240-21
23 Oct 2026, 22:3918,261-49
23 Oct 2026, 00:0918,310-26
22 Oct 2026, 00:3018,336-39
20 Oct 2026, 18:4018,375first reading

Engagement

64 posts held, back to 5 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 42 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 64 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

19,355 reactions across 44 posts, in 45 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤10,56854.6%
❤‍🔥1,0695.52%
💋9134.72%
🎉8044.15%
🤷‍♂4612.38%
🦄4432.29%
💘4092.11%
🎃4032.08%
🤩3571.84%
🤯3331.72%
🍓3071.59%
🙈2741.42%
😱2361.22%
👻2271.17%
😘2221.15%
🔥2161.12%
🤷‍♀2071.07%
😍2051.06%
😨1760.909%
🤝1590.821%
25 further kinds1,3667.06%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 44 of the 64 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19,355 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 64 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2025 to 31 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
1.56%
1 of 64 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
10,200
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
355
over 60 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2W5zFHYuBGd15 July 20265 July 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 64 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2025 to 31 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

30 Aug 2026, 21:21 UTC557 viewsread 31 August 2026

👤 Аноним отправил(а) вам Случайный подарок 🧸

30 Aug 2026, 06:46 UTC235 views7 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

КОМУ ЕЩЕ ПРЕМИУМ?)

👀3❤‍🔥2🤷‍♂2

30 Aug 2026, 06:44 UTC230 views2 reactionsread 30 August 2026

❤️Любимки забирайте пока их не забрали!!! Активаций: 10❕ ссылка для получения: Получить Premium

💋2

30 Aug 2026, 06:42 UTC237 views11 reactionsread 30 August 2026

ГОТОВЫ??? ❤️даааа

❤9🤷‍♂1🙈1

Showing the 12 most recent of 64 posts we hold for @daritocatiktok. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 4 posts on @daritocatiktok as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
18 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
19 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
22 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

тока бока 1.129 🎀скачать
@vzlomtoka_worldd · 76,702
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 36 here — alongside 35 others — read 18 August 2026
Тока бока 1.139🎀скачать
@vzlomtokavzz · 103,247
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 17 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Lenerox | Arlene Lee” (@daritocatiktok), 17,739 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/daritocatiktok.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.