Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for DARIAGAIGER

Channel

DARIAGAIGER

@dariagaiger

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Cite this entry

362subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001592338267
TypeChannel
Username@dariagaiger
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 24 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/dariagaiger

Growth

360363361.57 August 2026 — 363 subscribers8 August 2026 — 363 subscribers16 August 2026 — 360 subscribers24 August 2026 — 362 subscribers3627 August 202624 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 17 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 360–363 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Aug 2026, 14:13362+2
16 Aug 2026, 02:03360-3
8 Aug 2026, 06:32363no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:19363first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
27.7%
avg views ÷ 362 subscribers
Avg views / post
100
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.77%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 9 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held9 (4 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total901
Reactions total79
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 06:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
30s
Average length
30s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

79 reactions across 9 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3746.8%
❤‍🔥2126.6%
🔥1215.2%
😱56.33%
🥰45.06%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 79reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
44
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 9 we hold a reading for · 44%
Most on one post
13
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dariagaiger. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 9 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 14:47 UTC60 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Пост любви к тому, что у меня получилось создать внутри закрытого стильного клуба Остаются последние пару часов до закрытия и последние места Жду женщин, кто хочет новое дыхание в свой стиль и в то, как видите себя❤️🫂

3

6 Aug 2026, 08:21 UTC82 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥52

5 Aug 2026, 19:38 UTC92 views19 reactions13 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ну это же счастье, ребята ❤️🫂

❤‍🔥124🔥3

5 Aug 2026, 19:35 UTC93 views13 reactions13 Starsread 8 August 2026
Video

Господи, как же я богата на людей Благодарность огромная!!!!!!!!!!!

9❤‍🔥4

5 Aug 2026, 13:04 UTC98 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

В честь такой цифры хочу устроить вам небольшой подарок от меня🩵 В стильном Клубе вышла мой техника «разбора гардероба за 1 день». Захотелось поделиться ей с вами🫰🏼 По ней вы с легкостью уберете всё, что отжило, и оставите только то, что отражает вас. Я расскажу, как Помним, меняемся мы - меняется наш гардероб. Иначе вы будете застревать внешне в той версии себя, которая уже не про вас. Гардероб должен отражать вас

4

5 Aug 2026, 08:28 UTC108 views15 reactions13 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Для человека, который ведет свой блог и зарабатывает через интернет инструменты, рост аудитории - это огромное значение. Вчера, моих людей стало 13 тысяч. Ощущаю я это, как свою победу: в этот раз большую победу. В том году на мою страницу были нагнаны боты, год вычищение их… Что еще: набрать аудиторию это не такой сложный путь, как кажется. Сложно набрать своих, набрать свою целевую аудиторию, своих людей. Я очень

🔥96

4 Aug 2026, 08:11 UTC131 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Эконика удалила из запрещенной сети съемку с Роузи. Как же меня возмущает какие злые люди. Как съемка влияет на политическую ситуация в стране? Что за плоский разум ? Эконика, вы супер! Съемка была потрясающая. Это уровень. Это масштаб!

😱5

4 Aug 2026, 06:36 UTC127 views6 reactions5 Starsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🥰42

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @dariagaiger. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“DARIAGAIGER” (@dariagaiger), 362 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dariagaiger.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.