Video message, posted without a caption
😁4👍1

Channel
@daria_slastina
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
201subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001557456133 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @daria_slastina |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 2 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/daria_slastina |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 24 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Oct 2026, 12:16 | 201 | -5 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 02:00 | 206 | -1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 06:37 | 207 | +4 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 22:23 | 203 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:18 | 204 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:40 | 204 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
46 reactions across 11 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 82.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 38 | 82.6% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 8.70% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 4.35% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 2.17% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 2.17% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 46 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Video message, posted without a caption
😁4👍1
Video message, posted without a caption
❤2
Video message, posted without a caption
❤3
Video message, posted without a caption
Video message, posted without a caption
🐘 Dharma Talks #3: Як приручити слона Лагідна дисципліна уваги за Шантідевою Мій розум — дикий слон, — каже Шантідева. Не злий, не ворожий, просто ще не навчений стояти на місці. І замість того, щоб з ним воювати, він пропонує його приручити: мотузкою уваги, терпляче, знову і знову повертаючи туди, де треба бути. Це третя зустріч нашого циклу про гнів і затьмарення. Минулого разу ми говорили про війну з затьмарення…
❤2
Знаю, що багато людей злітається 22-23 сепня в Варшаві, щоб поїхати в ретрит Лами Юлі і Жені По такому поводу запрошуємо до нас на наступну живу зустріч ❤️
І нарешті завантажила відео з минулою живої зустрічі в Варшаві Цитую Шантідеву про гнів https://youtu.be/o9S0fnA47dQ?si=PcLrsLxd8CBoywz1
🔥2
коментарі на моєму ютую що думаєте?
❤🔥1
Я коли це прочитала, у мене склалось відчуття, що я давала таку обітницю, але не просто «перероджуватися» жінкою, а в кожному наступному народжені бути жінкою-мамою. І так до самого просвітлення А якщо не давала, то даю в цьому житті 🙏🏻 Немає історій про жінок-мам, мирянок з життям в побуті, які ставали Буддами. Думаю, такі жінки були, але просто історій немає. Треба це змінити:)
❤10
Ключовий момент історії: якісь ченці чи “доброзичливці” сказали їй — мовляв, твоя практика чудова, але якщо молитимешся переродитися в чоловічому тілі, це прискорить твій шлях до буддовості (стандартна на той час логіка — жіноче тіло вважали перешкодою). Вона відповіла їм різко і принципово: сказала, що поняття “чоловік” і “жінка” не мають істинного існування — це чисто умовні позначення, породжені заплутаними умами…
❤7
В нашій традиції є одна знаменита Буддеса — Тара. Про неї немає нічого у відкритих курсах АСІ, тож я просто запитала в ШІ. Виявилось у неї цікава історія:)
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @daria_slastina. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Якби Будда був мамою” (@daria_slastina), 201 subscribers as measured 2 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/daria_slastina.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.