Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Дао • Мяо

Channel

Дао • Мяо

@dao_miao

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,185subscribers

+4 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001910667632
TypeChannel
Username@dao_miao
CreatedBetween 1 March 2023 and 30 November 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/dao_miao

Growth

2,1812,1852,18312 Aug 2026, 00:45 — 2,181 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 16:04 — 2,185 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 00:4512 Aug 2026, 16:04
2 measurements taken within a single day, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,180–2,186 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 16:042,185+4
12 Aug 2026, 00:452,181first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.5%
avg views ÷ 2,185 subscribers
Avg views / post
295
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.05%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 17 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held20 (1 August 202611 August 2026)
Views total5,897
Reactions total196
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 00:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

196 reactions across 16 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
13769.9%
🔥3115.8%
👍2613.3%
👀10.51%
🤯10.51%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 196reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 21:26 UTC33 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @IaPhilosoph_philosophiaPhoto

Работа «Ищущие истину» ("В поисках философской терапии"), 2025 by #Елизавета_Власова Философская терапия подойдет вам, если вы: — ищете поддержку в разрешении вопросов о смысле, счастье, смерти, свободе, сложностях мира, ностальгии, борьбы "эроса" и "танатоса" внутри вас, проблемах творчества, — проходите психотерапию, но сталкиваетесь с пределами практики и вам нужно копнуть глубже в экзистенциальщину, — хотите н

🔥31👍1

11 Aug 2026, 14:34 UTC117 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Хосе Ортега-и-Гассет писал о дегуманизации искусства – когда массовый зритель ворвался в искусство, которое для максимизации прибыли вынуждено было себя упрощать до конкретных форм без лишних метафор, чтобы понял даже самый тупой. Почему сейчас часто снимают ремейки? Потому что это экономически выгоднее, чем рисковать и выпускать непонятный авангард или даже просто что-то новое. Но всё же в наше время есть искусство,

5👍3🔥3

11 Aug 2026, 14:34 UTC116 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Искусство – это дело вкуса? Принято думать, что искусство вещь субъективное, но так ли это? Одним нравятся фильмы в духе марвел, другим – какой-нибудь нетфликс, а третьим подавай артхаус. Каждый продукт находит свою целевую аудиторию, и спорить, что лучше бессмысленно. Но тут подмена понятий, кому-то действительно больше нравится фэнтези, а кому-то только реализм, но всё это лишь обёртки, в которые спрятана конфетка

4🔥2

9 Aug 2026, 07:23 UTC217 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026

В тему Линча напомню свой пост, а то чёт мало народу прочитало

7

8 Aug 2026, 20:43 UTC264 views26 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Если бы у меня была коммерческая жилка, я бы открыл бар Чёрный Вигвам. Бармен был бы в красной куртке и в красных очках, а вокруг красные шторы и шахматный пол. Задача бармена не просто налить, а разъебать какую-нибудь мыслительную конструкцию запивохи. Чем больше мы знаем, тем больше осознаём свою глупость. Когда люди заглянули в космос и узнали про чёрные дыры, кротовые норы и искривление пространства-времени, то в

15🔥9👀1🤯1

8 Aug 2026, 20:43 UTC242 views17 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Как узнать айкью за секунду? Качаю я тут себе фильмы в дорогу, решил пересмотреть Твин Пикс, зашёл в комментарии торрентов и понял как легко и быстро определить айкью. Просто спросите человека, как ему 3 сезон Твин Пикса? Если скажет "ни о чем, говно, два последних сезона были адекватней", то у этого человека не просто низкий айкью, он отрицательный. С таким человеком не о чем разговаривать, даже о погоде, так как

🔥98

7 Aug 2026, 09:08 UTC269 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Желающие опубликовать свою анкетку в будущем канале эзо-знакомств пишите в сообщения канала. Напишите имя или как вы предпочитаете, чтобы вас величали. Возраст, если для вас это важно. Напишите что-то о себе, какие учения ближе, интересы. Что и кого ищите. Город, или если он не важен, то интернет. Прикрепите свою фотку или картинку, мем Свой никнейм в телеге, еще можете ссылку на вк, так как я думал дополнительно п

7

6 Aug 2026, 16:24 UTC314 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026

НЛО часто понимают как инопланетян, но что если они однопланетяне? https://youtu.be/BpKNEYkLnhA

👍83

5 Aug 2026, 07:47 UTC387 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026

В свете последних постов пришла идея создать телеграм канал знакомств по эзотерическим интересам, шоб людям было проще находить общих по духу людей. Сразу скажу, что у меня основная цель это так еще продвигать этот канал и книгу. В телеге уже есть подобный канал, но там в основном чёрные маги и чернокнижники, что на любителя. Я готов даже потратить немного личных денег на продвижение, и с радостью приму ваши донаты н

6

4 Aug 2026, 21:55 UTC329 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @yougotmemystifiedFile

File, posted without a caption

5🔥2

4 Aug 2026, 21:55 UTC365 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @yougotmemystified

Четыре идеальных состояния ума. Четыре брахмавихары. Четыре добрых и чистых чувства души, которые человек может развивать внутри себя. Главная идея картинки о том, что эти четыре качества должны быть в связке. В центре спираль. Это означает, что всё в этой системе закручено вокруг одного стержня. Все эти качества не существуют сами по себе, они перетекают друг в друга, поддерживая равновесие. Центр спирали это мудро

7

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @dao_miao. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,133,588 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Дао • Мяо” (@dao_miao), 2,185 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dao_miao.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.