3 measurements spanning 4 days, net -9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,304–9,315 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Aug 2026, 21:47
9,305
-6
7 Aug 2026, 16:01
9,311
-3
7 Aug 2026, 09:45
9,314
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 7 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
111
Videos
10
Links
29
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
9s
Average length
9s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
154,592 reactions across 19 posts, in 28 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 95.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👎
148,273
95.9%
❤
2,176
1.41%
🙏
759
0.491%
❤🔥
594
0.384%
👍
531
0.343%
😱
462
0.299%
🥰
409
0.265%
😁
272
0.176%
🌚
234
0.151%
😢
222
0.144%
🤡
118
0.076%
🤬
97
0.063%
😍
87
0.056%
🤔
67
0.043%
🎉
55
0.036%
🤯
53
0.034%
🔥
39
0.025%
🍌
32
0.021%
🤣
32
0.021%
🥴
23
0.015%
8 further kinds
57
0.037%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 154,592reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 7 October 2025 to 11 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2,718
across the posts below
Posts paid on
11
of 19 we hold a reading for · 58%
Most on one post
1,520
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @danyanull. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 October 2025 to 11 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
В Brawl Stars опять насрано. Как же так?
Но начнем издалека. В этой игре есть такая сущность, как трейт (trait), которая описывает те или иные модификаторы поведения какого-либо объекта. Каждый игровой объект (а их всего 4 класса: AoE, characters, items и projectiles) имеет список своих трейтов.
Впервые в игре они появились в мае 2025 для ивента с васаби, и именно с их помощью были сделаны особые способности персон…
claude fix our insfrastructure make no mistakes
Если вам кажется, что серверам Brawl Stars после обновления стало плохо — нет, вам не кажется😑
Это заметно даже по графикам мониторинга нашего Null’s Proxy. Многие из них теперь выглядят довольно аномально. Во время большого онлайна трафик к серверам Supercell скачет туда-сюда, а количество реконнектов на каждого игрока выросло почти в два раза по сравнению с тем, что …
Помните о Mo.co? Новая игра Supercell, которая вышла в прошлом году. Они ее очень долго не обновляли, однако на днях произошел невероятный завоз контента, а именно:
1. Техперерыв на 24 часа. Я не шучу! Очевидно, ни один деплой не может длиться так долго и его растянули искусственно — но зачем?
2. Я зашел в игру и сразу же заметил, что моего собственного персонажа заменили на инвалида с темной кожей и кривым лицом. Ка…
Интересные факты о будущем Brawl Stars:
1. Кодовое имя одного из персонажей следующего (v68) обновления: KatanaKid. Его логика частично присутствует уже в текущей версии.
2. Кажется разработчики воодушевились нашим режимом на 50 игроков и добавили в игру скрытый режим "LargeShowdown". При этом глобальный лимит на количество команд повышен до 31 (было: 15), а на количество игроков аж до 63 (было: 15), но лимиты на раз…
кстати если че напоминаю
если вдруг вы скачали это приложение Telega то удалите немедленно!!
их сервера получают ключи для расшифровки всех ваших сообщений (если очень упрощенно)
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @danyanull. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Если бы по играм Supercell появилась новая вики (например, supercell.wiki), то я бы...
Мог бы поучаствовать в её наполнении28%
Мог бы пользоваться ей время от времени39%
Не посчитал бы её полезной33%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 7 October 2025 to 11 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 433,704 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Нулс Бравл | Нуллс @nulls_ru · 656,824 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 8 August 2026
Brawl Stars Datamines | BSD @bsdatamines · 479,075 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 9 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“данянул <3” (@danyanull), 9,305 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/danyanull.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
