Video message, posted without a caption
🔥14😁7❤5👍5👏3

Channel
@danila_invest_tg
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
7,480subscribers
-71 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001664023510 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @danila_invest_tg |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/danila_invest_tg |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 08:57 | 7,480 | -8 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 05:57 | 7,488 | -11 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 16:19 | 7,499 | -12 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 12:40 | 7,511 | -9 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 07:35 | 7,520 | -7 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 09:35 | 7,527 | -1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 23:18 | 7,528 | -12 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 12:53 | 7,540 | -5 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 01:47 | 7,545 | +4 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 20:52 | 7,541 | -3 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 13:44 | 7,544 | -2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 12:03 | 7,546 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:14 | 7,549 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:37 | 7,551 | first reading |
35 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 35 (23 July 2026 – 28 August 2026) |
| Views total | 771 |
| Reactions total | 99 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Aug 2026, 22:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
749 reactions across 34 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 262 | 35.0% | |
| ❤ | 165 | 22.0% | |
| custom 5316966373379839793 | 104 | 13.9% | |
| 👍 | 99 | 13.2% | |
| 👏 | 51 | 6.81% | |
| 😁 | 46 | 6.14% | |
| 🤩 | 9 | 1.20% | |
| 🤔 | 5 | 0.668% | |
| 😎 | 3 | 0.401% | |
| 🍾 | 2 | 0.267% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.134% | |
| 🗿 | 1 | 0.134% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 0.134% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 34 of the 35 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 749 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥14😁7❤5👍5👏3
Чужая подушка безопасности при аварии не спасёт 🚗 У меня есть странный фетиш - искать закономерности и изучать отчёты, вот что особенно интересного вычитал в последнее время: По данным Банка России, к ноябрю 2025 года граждане держали на банковских счетах и вкладах 63,5 трлн рублей. С начала 2022 года эта сумма выросла более чем на 82%, что абсолютный рекорд. Но эта цифра показывает, сколько денег лежит в банковско…
🔥9👍5👏4custom 53169663733798397933❤1
Сейчас понял, что неплохо бы залетела реклама какой-нибудь партии перед выборами 😅 (но нет)
😁9❤5
Сколько Россия потратила на то, чтобы мы не сидели в Instagram и YouTube? 🤔 Спойлер: десятки миллиардов рублей. Я не большой конечно политолог, но когда считаю (а я люблю и умею это делать) некоторые вещи, у меня волосы становятся дыбом! С 2019 года государство активно строит инфраструктуру «суверенного Рунета»: оборудование ТСПУ у операторов, системы фильтрации и анализа трафика, блокировки сайтов, замедление отд…
🔥13👏8❤6🗿1😱1
Пока твой бизнес тонет в НДС, инвестор попивает просеко в сторонке 😎 В очередной раз подавая декларацию по налогам и поймал себя на мысли: а ведь быть инвестором сейчас объективно выгоднее, чем предпринимателем. И это не потому что, я хочу сказать, что все предприниматели делают что-то плохо, просто математика риска сейчас откровенно говоря не на стороне бизнеса. Вот вам цифры за первое полугодие 2026-го, чтобы не …
👍7🔥7custom 53169663733798397936❤4
О дивный мир! ⛰️ В очередной раз прилетел в Южную Осетию. Мир, спрятанный за Кавказскими горами. Оооох какой же приятный воздух. Горные реки, леса, озёра, ущелья. Такое приятное единение с природой неиспорченной урбанистами. Сильнее всего чувствуется другое - насколько эта земля намоленная. Люблю древние храмы, монастыри и святилища. Стоят среди гор уже много веков, с большой историей и энергией. И когда оказыва…
❤10👍7🔥4👏1
Почему треть России тайно косплеит Скруджа Макдака? 🥇 Заметил цифру, которая меня позабавила и решил поделиться своими рассуждениями на этот счет. За первое полугодие 2026-го россияне купили золотых слитков на 31% больше, чем годом раньше. И в довесок золотые монеты на 8% больше, а серебряные на 45%. И вот тут возникает вопрос: а почему именно сейчас? Ответ прямо на поверхности: цена привлекательная, ведь начала …
🔥8❤4custom 53169663733798397934👍2👏1
Го ту зе мун? 🚀 Друзья, если следите за нашими Pre-IPO сделками, помните SpaceX, зашли туда ещё в 2024-м. Сейчас бумажная прибыль по позиции уже +522%. Компания вышла на IPO и стала одним из крупнейших размещений в истории с капитализацией $1,6 трлн. Из похожих историй сегодня по масштабу может сравниться разве что Anthropic, там мы тоже сидим, уже писал об этом тут. И вот в нашем арсенале появилась ещё одна интер…
🔥10👏6custom 53169663733798397936❤1👎1
Традиционный воскресный дайджест ⚡️🔥 Приветствую, друзья, на связи ваш любимый архитектор капитала Данила Ладнюк! Большую часть недели провёл в Дубае, решал важные рабочие моменты, встречался с партнёрами, заложил много всего на перспективу. Не буду раскрывать все карты заранее, но по ощущениям дальше будет только больше и интереснее 🚀 Вот, что выходило в канале на этой неделе ⬇️ ◾️ BTC to the moon Разобрал, что …
custom 53169663733798397937❤6🔥5🤩4👍1
Anthropic готовится к IPO с оценкой $2 трлн+ По данным Financial Times, инвесторы Anthropic рассчитывают, что компания может выйти на IPO уже в октябре с оценкой от $2 трлн. Если это произойдёт, размещение станет крупнейшим в истории и может обойти даже SpaceX по ожидаемой капитализации. Важная деталь: это пока не официальный таргет самой компании, а ожидания инвесторов, которые строят модели на резком росте выручк…
❤7🔥7custom 53169663733798397934🍾2👍2
Posted without readable text
🔥8❤5👍4custom 53169663733798397932
BTC TO THE MOON 🌒 Сегодня после движения BTC и ETH открыл несколько чатов и пабликов - везде примерно одно и то же: «Полетели 🚀» «Началось» «Разворот рынка» Констатировать факт мы умеем отлично)) Но гораздо важнее понимать почему это произошло. Особенно если вы инвестируете в этот класс активов. Давайте копнем чуть глубже. Последние дни одна из главных проблем рынков была в американском госдолге. Как в целом и п…
🔥9👏5😎3❤2👍1custom 53169663733798397931
Showing the 12 most recent of 35 posts we hold for @danila_invest_tg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ладнюк Данила | D1 Capital” (@danila_invest_tg), 7,480 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/danila_invest_tg.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.