Growth
Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 29 September 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 September 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 96
- Videos
- 25
- Links
- 60
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 1m 02s
- Average length
- 31s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
11 reactions across 4 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.4% of them.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 29 September 2022 to 30 September 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
30 Sept 2022, 10:11 UTC≈1,150 views6 reactionsread 13 August 2026 обязательно к прочтению
кинцуги приняли решение переехать на новый канал
-> @kkincugi
союзы ниже не разрываются
@vintterx
@neighhood
@drillovskie
@melodiste300
@korkunovsky
@ketterdm
@famdedovskie
@bordisss
@miyukifam
@tumannovskie
@devviiia
сейчас я от всех отпишусь и подпишусь по новому списку
если вас нет, то союз разрывается (мы в любой момент можем перезаключить договор на новом канале @kkincugi - @abkncg)
…
❤🔥4❤1👍1
Signed a b.ddvsk
29 Sept 2022, 21:21 UTC332 viewsread 13 August 2026 Sticker
Sticker, posted without a caption
Signed a b.ddvsk
29 Sept 2022, 21:21 UTC280 viewsread 13 August 2026 🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰
Signed a b.ddvsk
29 Sept 2022, 21:20 UTC263 viewsread 13 August 2026 Video
ᴀᴄᴄᴏциᴀции ᴏᴛ -¿?𝖿🐍𝗀𝗀𝗒 𝖿𝗈𝗈🫀𝗌*,::
<<<бᴧᴏᴦи, х϶ᴧᴨы, ᴋᴧᴀны, бᴏᴩдᴇᴧи, ᴋᴀнᴀᴧы ᴋᴀᴋ «пикчи с котиками 2.0»
бᴧᴀᴦᴏдᴀᴩю ɜᴀ учᴀᴄᴛиᴇ! нᴀдᴇюᴄь ʙыɯᴧᴏ нᴏᴩʍᴀᴧьнᴏ. ᴇᴄᴧи ᴋᴏʍу-ᴛᴏ чᴛᴏ-ᴛᴏ нᴇ ᴏчᴇнь ᴨᴏнᴩᴀʙиᴧᴏᴄь, ʍᴏжᴇᴛᴇ нᴀᴨиᴄᴀᴛь ʙ ᴧᴄ иᴧи ᴋᴏʍʍᴇнᴛᴀᴩии, я ᴨᴏʍᴇняю^^
#𝗋𝗉_𝗉𝗂𝗇𝗄𝗏
#𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇𝗌_𝗉𝗂𝗇𝗄𝗏
Signed a b.ddvsk
29 Sept 2022, 20:24 UTC121 viewsread 13 August 2026 СПАСИБО ЛЮБИМЫЙ
Signed a b.ddvsk
29 Sept 2022, 20:24 UTC115 viewsread 13 August 2026 ЭВЭАХКХАЗЗМХАЭМЖСЖМХКМЖДСЖАЗПЗАХахмжсжмжажазхпэа
Signed a b.ddvsk
29 Sept 2022, 20:24 UTC114 viewsread 13 August 2026 Forwarded from @devviiiaVideo
@daniellevskie
Signed a b.ddvsk
29 Sept 2022, 16:30 UTC96 views2 reactionsread 13 August 2026 участвуете все быстренько😾😾
🔥2
Signed a b.ddvsk
29 Sept 2022, 16:30 UTC90 viewsread 13 August 2026 фух, думала опоздаю
Signed a b.ddvsk
29 Sept 2022, 16:29 UTC88 views2 reactionsread 13 August 2026 Photo
◣◥◣◥◤◢◤◢◣◥◣◥◤◢◤◢◣◥
▀▄ ᴀᴄᴄᴏциᴀции ᴏᴛ ᴛиᴛᴀнᴏбᴏᴀ▄ ▀
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
ᴋᴧᴀны/ᴋɸ/ᴄᴇʍьи/бᴏᴩдᴇᴧи/хᴇᴧᴨы - ᴋᴀᴋ персонажи из игры " Subway Surfers"
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
•••••уᴄᴧᴏʙия•••••
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
╰► ᴄᴛᴀндᴀᴩᴛ
╰► реакцию на пост
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
•••••ʍᴇᴄᴛ 7/77•••••
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
◣◥◣◥◤◢◤◢◣◥◣◥◤◢◤◢◣◥
#𝘵𝘪𝘵𝘢𝘯𝘰𝘣𝘰𝘢_𝘳𝘱
#𝘵𝘪𝘵𝘢𝘯𝘰𝘣𝘰𝘢_𝘢𝘴𝘴𝘰𝘤𝘪𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯
❤1👍1
Signed a b.ddvsk
29 Sept 2022, 12:18 UTC84 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026 спасибо за ассоциацию, родной💋💋💋
🥰1
Signed a b.ddvsk
29 Sept 2022, 12:18 UTC77 viewsread 13 August 2026 плейлист лиама>>>>>
Signed a b.ddvsk
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @daniellevskie. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,080,607 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 8
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 8
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@daniellevskie named 8 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@tumannovskie
named in 2 posts, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
@famdedovskie
named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
@ketterdm
named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
@kkincugi
named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
@abkncg
named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
@melodiste300
named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
@nlxsoch
named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
@korkunovsky
named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“переехали ᴋɪɴᴄᴜɢɪ” (@daniellevskie), 3 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/daniellevskie.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.