Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for دەنگی نیشتمان

Channel

دەنگی نیشتمان

@dange_nishtman

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

37,328subscribers

-217 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002294261065
TypeChannel
Username@dange_nishtman
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/dange_nishtman

Growth

37,32837,54537,436.57 August 2026 — 37,545 subscribers7 August 2026 — 37,545 subscribers8 August 2026 — 37,534 subscribers9 August 2026 — 37,514 subscribers9 August 2026 — 37,466 subscribers10 August 2026 — 37,448 subscribers11 August 2026 — 37,442 subscribers12 August 2026 — 37,433 subscribers13 August 2026 — 37,415 subscribers14 August 2026 — 37,396 subscribers16 August 2026 — 37,368 subscribers17 August 2026 — 37,328 subscribers7 August 202617 August 2026
12 measurements spanning 10 days, net -217. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 37,295–37,578 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 19:3837,328-40
16 Aug 2026, 14:0437,368-28
14 Aug 2026, 21:1637,396-19
13 Aug 2026, 15:4837,415-18
12 Aug 2026, 16:4337,433-9
11 Aug 2026, 20:1337,442-6
10 Aug 2026, 23:0437,448-18
9 Aug 2026, 23:3537,466-48
9 Aug 2026, 01:3137,514-20
8 Aug 2026, 01:4637,534-11
7 Aug 2026, 13:0037,545no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:5537,545first reading

Engagement

83 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 24 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.8%
avg views ÷ 37,328 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,270
83 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.649%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
83
of 83 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 82 of 83 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026
Posts held83 (30 July 202617 August 2026)
Views total520,790
Reactions total3,342
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken17 Aug 2026, 12:26 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
38m 38s
Average length
1m 29s

Measured directly from 26 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

3,342 reactions across 82 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,10233.0%
🤬53816.1%
😁53516.0%
👏45813.7%
👍40512.1%
😢1344.01%
💯581.74%
🔥401.20%
👎280.838%
🤷‍♂270.808%
🥰100.299%
🙏60.18%
10.03%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 82 of the 83 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,342reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 83 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Aug 2026, 10:24 UTC≈1,270 views14 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Forwarded from @Lurestan_radioVideo

🔹مسعود صفری، جوان ۲۰ ساله اهل روستای سرچم‌لو در استان ایلام، بر اساس گزارش‌های رسیده پس از یورش مأموران پاسگاه گنجوان به منزل خانوادگی‌اش بازداشت و به مکانی نامعلوم منتقل شده است. گزارش‌ها حاکی است این عملیات روز اول اردیبهشت ۱۴۰۵ رخ داده و در جریان آن از گاز اشک‌آور و تیراندازی هوایی استفاده شده است. اندکی بعد، خانه خانواده صفری دچار آتش‌سوزی شد و به‌طور کامل از بین رفت. بر اساس اطلاعات موجود، مسعود صفری که داخل س

🤬113

17 Aug 2026, 08:55 UTC≈2,110 views21 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

🔹دهگلان؛ یدالله مطاعی، با ۳۱ سال سابقه از مربی‌گری و دایر کردن باشگاه کاراته منع شد ۲۵ مرداد ۱۴۰۵؛ «یدالله مطاعی»، شهروند کورد اهل دهگلان و مربی کاراته با ۳۱ سال سابقه فعالیت ورزشی که پیشتر در جریان خیزش انقلابی ژن ژیان ئازادی بازداشت و به حبس محکوم شده بود، از سوی حراست اداره کل ورزش و جوانان استان کوردستان از ادامه فعالیت ورزشی، مربی‌گری و دایر کردن هرگونه باشگاه منع شد. @dange_nishtman

🤬10😢72👏1🔥1

17 Aug 2026, 05:47 UTC≈2,740 views55 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Video

🔹نماینده تویله ایرانی به گوه خوردن افتاد @dange_nishtman

🤬41😁131

17 Aug 2026, 03:15 UTC≈3,060 views24 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Video

⁨ ⁨ 🔹هاونیشتمانیانی خۆشەویستی کوردستان، دۆست و هاوڕێیانی بەڕێز، لەم ساتە پڕ لە هەست و خۆشییەدا کە دڵم پڕە لە سوپاس و پێزانین، دەمەوێت لە ناخەوە بۆ هەمووتان بدوێم. سەرکەوتنم لە پاڵەوانێتیی تایکواندۆ لە وڵاتی کۆریا، تەنیا سەرکەوتنی من نەبوو؛ ئەمە سەرکەوتنی هەموو ئەو دڵانە بوو کە لە دوور و نزیکەوە پاڵپشتم بوون، هانیان دام و ورەیان پێ بەخشیم. من لە هەر قۆناغێکی ڕاهێنان و لە هەر کێبڕکێیەکدا، خۆم بە هەڵگری ئیرادەی ئەو ش

19👍4👏1

16 Aug 2026, 19:55 UTC≈3,810 views15 reactionsread 17 August 2026

🔹این پیام از سوی جمعی از شهروندان سنندج خطاب به پاسدار غریب سجادی، و #فرمانده نیروی انتظامی، و #آرش لهونی، استاندار، مطرح می‌شود: پیام‌های متعددی از شهر سنندج درباره دریافت مبالغ غیرقانونی از سوی برخی افراد در فرایند آزمون راهنمایی و رانندگی و همچنین برای درخواست پرداخت مجدد هزینه ثبت‌نام از سوی مردم دریافت شده است و به صورت کاملا واضح از مردم درخواست رشوه می‌کنند. در صورت تکرار چنین تخلفاتی، مسئولیت رسیدگی و پاس

11🤬3😁1

16 Aug 2026, 19:09 UTC≈3,970 views23 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

🔹سرپرست های خانوار با کد ملی ۷ . ۸ . ۹ این ماه سبد کالا بهشون تعلق نمیگیره از طریق پنل بله اطلاع دادن باید دیشب واریز میشد که نکردن برای یک ماه رو خوردن انداختن از ماه بعد. @dange_nishtman

🤬184😁1

16 Aug 2026, 17:52 UTC≈4,470 views69 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

🔹پاسخ تند والدین ژینا امینی به اهانت نماینده مجلس ​در آستانه سالگرد شهادت ژینا (مهسا) امینی، امجد امینی و مژگان افتخاری، پدر و مادر وی، با انتشار بیانیه‌ای به اظهارات توهین‌آمیز احمد آریایی‌نژاد، نماینده مجلس، پاسخ دادند. ​آن‌ها با تأکید بر ماندگاری نام ژینا در تاریخ ایران و نقش او در آزادی‌خواهی مردم، اعلام کردند این‌گونه اهانت‌ها چیزی از جایگاه فرزندشان کم نمی‌کند. والدین ژینا همچنین از وضعیت سخت معیشتی جامعه و س

👏54👎76👍1😢1

16 Aug 2026, 13:45 UTC≈4,510 views30 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

🔹کوردها، ساکنان بومی و چند هزارسالهٔ زاگرس؛ نگاهی به مستندات تاریخی، باستان‌شناسی و ژنتیک موضوع اصالت و قدمت سکونت ملت کورد در گسترهٔ جغرافیایی زاگرس و بین‌النهرین شمالی، نه بر پایهٔ ادعا، بلکه متکی بر یافته‌های دقیق علمی، کتیبه‌های باستانی و پژوهش‌های بین‌المللی است. 📌 مهم‌ترین مستندات تاریخی همراه با منابع معتبر علمی: ✅ پیشینهٔ دیرینه‌شناسی و باستان‌شناسی زیست‌گاه: غار شانه‌در (اقلیم کوردستان): کشف بقایای انسان‌

26👍4

16 Aug 2026, 09:47 UTC≈4,700 views41 reactionsread 17 August 2026

🔹ارسالی از شهر قروه معدن طلای زرکوه باسرعت خیره کننده درحال غارت ونابودی توسط همان اختاپوس غارتکر ایرانی حرامزاده است. اکثرنیروهایش غیربومی است تنهاسهم قروه ازطلای زرکوه فقط آلودگی منابع آب زیرزمینی به سیانور وآلودگی هوای اطراف ومحیط نازیست به اسیدهای مضر و خرابی جاده است. سرطان درحال رسوخ به مردم آن منطقه است.شرکت کنسانتره ساریخانی هم که الی ماشاالله پراز نیروهای غیر بومی است . دریغ ازیک مسئول باغیرت ودلسوز که

31🔥10

16 Aug 2026, 08:08 UTC≈4,850 views18 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Video

🔹پیام موساد ،به سران رژیم تروریستی ایران @dange_nishtman

👏122👎2👍1🤬1

15 Aug 2026, 22:38 UTC≈5,250 views54 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

🔹 قروه؛ تارا فرهنگیان، دانشجوی ۲۱ ساله به حبس، شلاق و تبعید محکوم شد 🔻 تارا فرهنگیان، دانشجوی کورد و اهل قروه و از بازداشت‌شدگان اعتراضات دی‌ماه ۱۴۰۴، توسط دستگاه قضایی رژیم تروریستی جمهوری اسلامی ایران در مجموع به ۱ سال حبس تعزیری، ۳۱ ضربه شلاق، ۲ سال تبعید به زابل و پرداخت ۱۲۰ میلیون تومان جریمه نقدی محکوم شد. @dange_nishtman

25🤬22👎3👏3👍1

15 Aug 2026, 19:25 UTC≈4,790 views17 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Voice message

🔹بەراوردێک لە نێوان نەتەوەی جوولەکە و کورد بۆچی گەلی جوولەکە بە ۱۰ ملیۆن کەسەوە توانییان خۆیان ڕزگار بکەن و دەوڵەتی سەربەخۆی خۆیان دابمەزرێنن، بەڵام نەتەوەی کورد بە ٥٠ ملیۆن کەسەوە هێشتا نەیتوانیوە؟ 🎤#ئەحمەد_مورادی 🔺قوتابخانەی #کرماشان ناوەندی بڵاوڪردونەوەی بواری فەلسەفە و بیری ڪوردایەتی @Kermashanschool

13👏4

Showing the 12 most recent of 83 posts we hold for @dange_nishtman. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@dange_nishtman edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
15 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 34,737 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“دەنگی نیشتمان” (@dange_nishtman), 37,328 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dange_nishtman.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.