Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for دانستنی ها

Channel

دانستنی ها

@danestanilha

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

32,115subscribers

-1,062 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001061178799
TypeChannel
Username@danestanilha
Created21 June 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 November 2026
Measurements held67
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/danestanilha

Topic

Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 12 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@irwonders/572684 Sept 2026, 10:58 UTC@danestanilha/104690 · this entry4 Sept 2026, 11:45 UTC0.9747 minutes
@irwonders/594845 Nov 2026, 11:59 UTC@danestanilha/105580 · this entry8 Nov 2026, 15:08 UTC0.963 days
@irwonders/5879517 Oct 2026, 08:28 UTC@danestanilha/105434 · this entry25 Oct 2026, 19:03 UTC0.958 days
@irwonders/5924029 Oct 2026, 14:59 UTC@danestanilha/105502 · this entry30 Oct 2026, 10:34 UTC0.9520 hours
@irwonders/5969711 Nov 2026, 09:27 UTC@danestanilha/105620 · this entry11 Nov 2026, 19:47 UTC0.9410 hours
@irwonders/5813029 Sept 2026, 17:00 UTC@danestanilha/105170 · this entry7 Oct 2026, 07:35 UTC0.938 days
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@irwonders42 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9422 hours@irwonders (37–5)
@wonderfullllll31 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9620 hoursthis entry (22–9)
@Jaleb28 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9530 hours@Jaleb (28–0)
@Amazingss27 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.962 days@Amazingss (25–2)
@MidonstiOrg26 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9815 hours@MidonstiOrg (22–4)
@lostworldss24 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9622 hoursthis entry (13–11)
@valpeiper_news22 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9521 hours@valpeiper_news (20–2)
@Scary_Movies1020 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.989.7 hours@Scary_Movies10 (20–0)
@bayadbedoni12 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9524 hours@bayadbedoni (8–4)
@newmatter12 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9736 hours@newmatter (12–0)
@factpedia11 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9541 hours@factpedia (10–1)
@ancientir10 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9620 hours@ancientir (8–2)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 235 of the 237 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 565 comparable posts for this entry, running 30 July 2026 to 13 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 14 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

32,11533,17932,6475 August 202614 November 2026
67 measurements spanning 101 days, net -1,062. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 31,955–33,339 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 67
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Nov 2026, 20:4932,115-46
11 Nov 2026, 17:4732,161-13
9 Nov 2026, 23:5432,174-13
8 Nov 2026, 16:1632,187-4
7 Nov 2026, 10:4832,191-13
6 Nov 2026, 08:4432,204-7
5 Nov 2026, 08:2032,211-15
4 Nov 2026, 06:2832,226-7
3 Nov 2026, 08:1432,233-7
2 Nov 2026, 09:0532,240-8
1 Nov 2026, 11:2932,248-7
31 Oct 2026, 09:1032,255-17
30 Oct 2026, 07:3632,272-6
29 Oct 2026, 06:4532,278-12
28 Oct 2026, 05:5132,290-3
27 Oct 2026, 05:0032,293-5
26 Oct 2026, 08:2132,298-11
25 Oct 2026, 05:2132,309-10
24 Oct 2026, 08:3032,319-12
23 Oct 2026, 07:0532,331first reading

Engagement

1,116 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 179 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.17%
avg views ÷ 32,115 subscribers
Avg views / post
697
381 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.391%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
381
of 1,116 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 272 of 381 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 November 2026
Posts held1,116 (30 July 2026 – 14 November 2026)
Views total265,717
Reactions total779
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Nov 2026, 20:25 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5h 30m
Average length
35s

Measured directly from 566 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2,253 reactions across 715 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1,59570.8%
💩53223.6%
👎1265.59%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 719 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,253 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 17 August 2026 to 14 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 381 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

14 Nov 2026, 20:07 UTC54 viewsread 14 November 2026
Video

با چند تا بخیه ساده و یه کم حوصله، می‌شه این زنبورهای کوچولو رو نشوند روی پارچه بدون وزوز، بدون نیش! 😶 @danestanilha 😐

14 Nov 2026, 20:00 UTC109 viewsread 14 November 2026
Photo

تصویر بالا از پربازدیدترین تصاویر اینترنتی هستش که یه آهوی مادر رو نشون میده که از عمد ایستاد تا دوتا پلنگ بخورنش تا بچه هاش بتونن بهتر فرار کنن، اون داره فرار بچه هاش رو می بینه 😶 @danestanilha 😐

14 Nov 2026, 19:53 UTC139 viewsread 14 November 2026
Photo

اینا رژ لب نیستن 😶 @danestanilha 😐

14 Nov 2026, 19:46 UTC167 viewsread 14 November 2026
Video

این حشره نیست، میگوی ماده (میگوی آب شیرین) است. این میگوی زیر شکمش هزاران تخم/لارو نارنجی دارد و در زمان مناسب رها می‌کند. به این تعداد زیاد برای این است که حداقل برخی از شکارچیان جان سالم به در ببرند. _شگفتی طبیعت! 😶 @danestanilha 😐

14 Nov 2026, 19:39 UTC184 viewsread 14 November 2026
Photo

عظمت و شکوه دماوند توی هواپیما و از بالای تهران خیلی بیشتر به چشم میاد 😶 @danestanilha 😐

14 Nov 2026, 19:32 UTC220 views1 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

اینجا دانشکده فنی مونیخ براشون ب جای آسانسور سرسره زدن که هم توو مصرف انرژی صرفه جویی شه هم دانشجوها کلی انرژی بگیرن. 😶 @danestanilha 😐

👍1

14 Nov 2026, 19:25 UTC209 viewsread 14 November 2026
Video

جدیداً تو چین یه تابلوهایی بالای توالت‌های عمومی نصب کردن که نشون میده اون آدمی که داخل توالته چند دقیقه قبل واردش شده. تا هرکی میره دستشویی سریع کارشو انجام بده و فکر انجام کارهای دیگه به سرش نزنه ! 😶 @danestanilha 😐

14 Nov 2026, 19:18 UTC237 viewsread 14 November 2026
Photo

هوای داخل سالن های ناخن به اندازه کارخانه های شیمیایی سمی است و ماسک صورت کمکی نمیکند! ◽️پژوهش‌ها در آمریکا و تهران نشان داده‌اند که هوای سالن‌های ناخن حاوی ترکیبات شیمیایی مانند فرمالدهید، تولوئن، متیل متاکریلات و ذرات معلق است. مواجهه طولانی‌مدت با این مواد می‌تواند سلامت شغلی کارکنان را به خطر بیندازد. آیا ماسک کافی است؟😷 ماسک‌های پارچه‌ای و جراحی مانع استنشاق بخارات شیمیایی نمی‌شوند. استفاده از فیلتر تنفسی من…

14 Nov 2026, 19:11 UTC305 viewsread 14 November 2026
Photo

ساختمانی در شهر تورینو ایتالیا ساخته شده که ترکیبی است از ۵ طبقه به همراه ۱۵۰ درخت و تیرآهن هایی شبیه به تنه درختان که به ساکنینش حس زندگی در 1 خانه درختی را انتقال میدهد 😶 @danestanilha 😐

14 Nov 2026, 19:04 UTC333 views2 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

جالب است بدانید اثر انگشت در رحم مادر شکل می‌گیرد! این برجستگی‌های پرپیچ وخم در اثر تماس دست جنین با دیواره رحم که اطرافش را فرا گرفته ایجاد می‌شود و به همین دلیل حتی برای دوقلوها یکسان نیست. 😶 @danestanilha 😐

👍2

13 Nov 2026, 18:34 UTC964 views5 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Video

‼️از عجایب کره اینه که موز از آب معدنی ارزونتره🤡 😶 @danestanilha 😐

👍5

13 Nov 2026, 18:27 UTC948 views3 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

رستورانی در اردن که ایده صاحبش اینه که اگر مشتری بعد از غذا خوردن خوابش گرفت باید تو رستوران یه جا برای چرت بعد از ناهار وجود داشته باشه!! 😶 @danestanilha 😐

👍3

Showing the 12 most recent of 1,116 posts we hold for @danestanilha. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

پادکست کتاب صوتی رمان داستان
@Bo_p2 · 117,037
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 14 August 2026
اخبار فوری/جنگ اسراییل ایران آمریکا
@khabarfour1 · 199,469
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 13 August 2026
ریمیکس رادیوجوان جوان Radio Javan
@rimix_javan1 · 132,364
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 13 August 2026
اخبار سینما فیلم سریال
@cinema_news3 · 52,118
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 33 here — alongside 32 others — read 24 August 2026
پروکسی فیلترشکن کانفینگ
@proxybazzi6 · 124,298
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 13 August 2026
جهان تاریخی
@Worlddax · 61,415
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 21 August 2026
اطلاعات عمومی ❀
@newmatter · 47,276
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 26 August 2026
قیمت دلار طلا خودرو
@dollartallai · 67,920
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 20 August 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“دانستنی ها” (@danestanilha), 32,115 subscribers as measured 14 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/danestanilha.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.