Here is the breakdown I promised. Check out the full post on X 😮
Signed DamX

Channel
@damxdiary
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,314subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002002936485 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @damxdiary |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/damxdiary |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 03:55 | 1,314 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:04 | 1,316 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:03 | 1,316 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 16 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (16 June 2026 – 23 July 2026) |
| Views total | 1,833 |
| Reactions total | 38 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 08:04 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Here is the breakdown I promised. Check out the full post on X 😮
Signed DamX
This is about to be the BIGGEST ONBOARDING the crypto space has ever witnessed. And guess what? It’ll be on TON Blockchain, powered by its native currency, $GRAM Most people have no idea how massive this is. I’ll break it down for you based on what I know and what I have known these past few months.
Signed DamX
OMG 😳 Durov just said a non-custodial Gram Wallet is coming for all Telegram users. Gave y’all the hint.
Signed DamX
Here's basically how it works: you submit the username on our form in hoton.tg (live soon), transfer the channel/group to our Hoton account (powered by Teleton), place the first bid, that’s all. The moment your bid lands, ownership is automatically transferred back to you. That transfer is the only manual step; everything else runs on its own. Why the transfer? Minting a Telegram username needs temporary full owner…
Signed DamX
Gram Morning 💎 Like I said on X, very soon, anyone would be able to mint their Telegram username with @hoton without KYC. Already testing it and it works really well.
Signed DamX
Hi fam. It’s been a while
Signed DamX
Hey fam. Gm. 🌅 Didn't realize when I slept off, lmao 🌅 Gonna continue trying to make Nyx buy stars for us. The @hotonmcp is all good, It’s just an “agent problem” now. Because we've tested above, and even @zkproof did use it in this group and it worked perfectly. Nyx has just been stubborn 🤣 but we gonna make her work today.
Signed DamX
Time to test is in our chat. Will tell one of my ai agent to join the chat and let’s see if she’ll be able to use the hoton-mcp to buy stars for us.
Signed DamX
And yes.. as I promised The Hoton Model Context Protocol (MCP) is now live! It lets your AI agent buy Premium, Stars, or top up your in-app GRAM balance in Telegram by just telling it to do so in natural language. More info here @hotonmcp GitHub
Signed DamX
The quality of the gif is low because it was overly compressed from a video due to the large size. As y’all know, my uploads are usually crisp & in 4K 😏… so seeing this even irks me 😣 Next time will figure out a way to convert large videos to gifs without losing quality.
Signed DamX
The update is now live. You can now buy for multiple users at once on hoton.tg Try it out on the mini app @hoton
Signed DamX
Next, I'll try multiple accounts. If it works, I'll add one of my agents to the chat and ask it to buy stars for some people to see if it does.
Signed DamX
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @damxdiary. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,025,749 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“DamX” (@damxdiary), 1,314 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/damxdiary.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.