Channel
@dalian20264
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
32,129subscribers
-34 since we began measuring on 22 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003251726587 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dalian20264 |
| Description | 本群唯一管理上榜广告联系: @dlelsbot 大连俄罗斯风情街聊天群: https://t.me/haerbin88888888 |
| Created | Between 1 October 2025 and 31 January 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 22 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dalian20264 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Aug 2026, 06:11 | 32,129 | +8 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 06:43 | 32,121 | -5 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 05:33 | 32,126 | -14 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 00:53 | 32,140 | -23 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 23:00 | 32,163 | no change |
| 22 Aug 2026, 22:45 | 32,163 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 22 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (22 August 2026 – 27 August 2026) |
| Views total | 11,343 |
| Reactions total | 7 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 27 Aug 2026, 14:13 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
7 reactions across 6 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 7 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 22 August 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
以下是大连今日开课出勤老师名单， 点击老师名字即可立即跳转该老师页面。 中山区: ⭐依依老师⭐南枝老师⭐安玥1000⭐ ⭐会会老师 ⭐王曦老师⭐瑾禾老师⭐ ⭐嘻嘻老师 ⭐奶芙老师⭐晚笙老师⭐ ⭐路路老师 ⭐小瑶老师⭐奶黄老师⭐ ⭐妍宝老师 ⭐梦梦老师⭐陈陈800 ⭐ ⭐星星500 ⭐呆呆500 ⭐C米700 ⭐ ⭐抓龙筋500⭐诗涵700⭐小米700⭐ ⭐ 一彤500 ⭐冉冉700⭐ 西岗区： 🥓多肉500⭐媚娘500⭐王菲600⭐ ⭐新彤800⭐空位 ⭐空位⭐ ⭐空位 ⭐空位 ⭐空位⭐ 沙河口区： ⭐小北 ⭐kiki700 ⭐甜心600⭐ ⭐团子700⭐空位 ⭐空位⭐ ⭐空位 ⭐空位 ⭐空位⭐ 开发区： ⭐小宝400 ⭐空位 ⭐空位⭐ ⭐空位 ⭐空位 ⭐空位⭐ 甘井子区： ⭐超甜呀600⭐程宝600 ⭐叶子600⭐…
❤1
本群上榜老师已通过视频认证 🧚♂:中山区:标签:#萝莉 #兼职 #嫩妹老师花名: 👉 涵涵 老师价格：👉 700 私信老师: 👉 点击直联老师 双向联系: 👉 双向点击联系 老师频道: 👉 查看老师频道 书写车评: 👉 点击书写车评 服务内容:#69 #简单按摩 #制服诱惑 #指划 #刮痧 #按摩
本群上榜老师已通过视频认证 🧚♂:中山区:标签:#长腿 #嫩妹老师花名: 👉 哆哆 老师价格： 👉 400 私信老师: 👉 点击直联老师 双向联系: 👉 双向点击联系 老师频道: 👉 查看老师频道 书写车评: 👉 点击书写车评 服务内容:#69 #制服诱惑 #指划
Photo, posted without a caption
本群上榜老师已通过视频认证 🧚♂:中山区:标签:#御姐 #服务系 #熟女老师花名: 👉 馨雅 老师价格: 👉 400 私信老师: 👉 点击直联老师 双向联系: 👉 双向点击联系 老师频道: 👉 查看老师频道 书写车评: 👉 点击书写车评 服务内容:#69 #舌吻 #制服诱惑 #胸推
✅本群上榜老师已通过视频认证 🧚♂:#大连 #甘井子区 标签:#69 #深喉 #毒龙 #海底捞月老师花名:#悠悠 老师价格:#400p 私信老师:👉点击联系老师 双向联系:👉双向联系 老师频道:👉老师频道 书写车评:👉点击写车评 服务内容:
❤2
✅本群上榜老师已通过视频认证 🧚♂:#大连 #中山区 标签:#熟女老师花名:#含羞草 老师价格:#300 私信老师:👉点击联系老师 双向联系:👉双向联系 老师频道:👉老师频道 书写车评:👉点击写车评 服务内容:#69 #毒龙 #制服 #漫游
❤1
✅本群上榜老师已通过视频认证 🧚♂:#大连#沙河口区 标签:#御姐 #毒龙老师花名:#小星 老师价格:#600p 私信老师:👉点击联系老师 双向联系:👉双向联系 老师频道:👉老师频道 书写车评:👉点击写车评 服务内容:
✅本群上榜老师已通过视频认证 🧚♂:#大连#西岗区 标签:#御姐老师花名:#米莱 老师价格:#500p 私信老师:👉点击联系老师 双向联系:👉双向联系 老师频道:👉老师频道 书写车评:👉点击写车评 服务内容:
❤1
✅本群上榜老师已通过视频认证 🧚♂:#大连 #中山区 标签:#御姐老师花名:晚晚 老师价格:900 私信老师:👉点击联系老师 双向联系:👉双向联系 老师频道:👉老师频道 书写车评:👉点击写车评 服务内容:看课表
❤1
Photo, posted without a caption
✅本群上榜老师已通过视频认证 🧚♂:#大连#中山区 标签:#bbw老师花名:#糯糯 老师价格:#600p 私信老师:👉点击联系老师 双向联系:👉双向联系 老师频道:👉老师频道 书写车评:👉点击写车评 服务内容:
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @dalian20264. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 775,350 of 1,621,120entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“大连（俄罗斯风情街）公开榜” (@dalian20264), 32,129 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dalian20264.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.