Channel

𝑫𝑨𝑰𝑹𝑰𝑺

@dairis_vampirs

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

145subscribers

+119 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID	-1004473770890
Type	Channel
Username	@dairis_vampirs
Created	Between 1 June 2026 and 10 August 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded	11 August 2026
Last confirmed live	16 August 2026
Measurements held	3
Confirmed unchanged	1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegram	t.me/dairis_vampirs

Growth

3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +119. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8–163 and does not start at zero.

Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)	Subscribers	Change
16 Aug 2026, 08:55	145	+119
11 Aug 2026, 08:19	26	no change
9 Aug 2026, 00:15	26	first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 10 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days: 15.3%; avg views ÷ 145 subscribers
Avg views / post: 22.3; 20 posts measured
Reaction rate: —; this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window: 20; of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
Window	Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held	20 (10 August 2026 – 11 August 2026)
Views total	445
Reactions total	—
Forwards / comments	not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken	11 Aug 2026, 08:19 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime: 1m 05s
Average length: 1m 05s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 91,686 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

𝑺𝒘𝒆𝒆𝒕𝒏𝒆𝒔𝒔 𝒍𝒊𝒇𝒆
@Sweetness_life1 · 292 posts 𝒂𝒘𝒆𝒔𝒐𝒎𝒆 𝒇𝒂𝒎𝒊𝒍𝒚
@awesomefamily67 · 1101 post CLOSED 𝐂𝐀𝐑𝐈Ñ𝐎.𝐈𝐍𝐅𝐎
@carinoinfof · 311 post 𝒥𝘦𝘭𝘭𝘴 𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘯𝘯𝘦𝘭 ``🍋
@jellsflood · 701 post 𝗹𝗶𝗽𝘀𝘁𝘆 𝗶𝗻𝗳𝗼
@lipstic_k · 461 post [CLOSED MALVY]
@malvyyM · 781 post ⁀ ' ₊최고였다˚ꪑꪱꪀt r𖦹ઽ٤s ᠻ†᥆᥆𝓭 ꪱꪀᠻo ° . 🫧
@mintrosesfloodinfo · 391 post litmix — 🤍
@rk_litmix · 681 post life 🎼||ＳＡＩＬＥＳ.・゜゜・ᶠᶫᵒᵒᵈ
@sailes_flood_life · 411 post 𝑺𝑨𝑵𝒀 𝑰𝑵𝑭𝑶
@sanyyyyy3 · 801 post sence’t info
@sencetflood · 351 post

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

𝒍𝒐𝒘𝒌𝒆𝒚
@lowkey_flood34 · 2131 post litmix — 🤍
@rk_litmix · 681 post 𝑽𝑰𝑽𝑨𝑳𝑬𝑵𝑻 / 𝑰𝑵𝑭𝑶
@vivalents · 2001 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 16 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

𝒂𝒘𝒆𝒔𝒐𝒎𝒆 𝒇𝒂𝒎𝒊𝒍𝒚
@awesomefamily67 · 1102 posts 𝗹𝗶𝗽𝘀𝘁𝘆 𝗶𝗻𝗳𝗼
@lipstic_k · 462 posts [CLOSED MALVY]
@malvyyM · 782 posts ❛𝘾𝙖𝙥𝙝❜
@bycaph · 741 post CLOSED 𝐂𝐀𝐑𝐈Ñ𝐎.𝐈𝐍𝐅𝐎
@carinoinfof · 311 post ˚₊‧ 𝓒𝓱𝓻𝓸𝓶𝓮 𝓗𝓮𝓪𝓻𝓽𝓼 ‧₊˚
@chhromehearttss · 381 post infᴏ 𝙘𝙧𝙤𝙨𝙨𝙚𝙙 𝙨𝙞𝙣𝙣𝙚𝙧𝙨
@crossedsinners · 1641 post 𝘿𝙀𝙀𝙋𝙑𝙄𝙇𝙇𝙄𝘼𝙉 / 𝙄𝙉𝙁𝙊
@deepvillian · 1361 post ⁀ ' ₊최고였다˚ꪑꪱꪀt r𖦹ઽ٤s ᠻ†᥆᥆𝓭 ꪱꪀᠻo ° . 🫧
@mintrosesfloodinfo · 391 post 𝑴𝑶𝑳𝑳𝑨𝑵𝑺 𝑭𝑳𝑶𝑶𝑫|𝑰𝑵𝑭𝑶
@mollansflood · 1081 post litmix — 🤍
@rk_litmix · 681 post 🍸 `` L Ì P Š ¹⁵⁷
@rklipss · 1041 post 𝑺𝑨𝑵𝒀 𝑰𝑵𝑭𝑶
@sanyyyyy3 · 801 post 𝑺𝒘𝒆𝒆𝒕𝒏𝒆𝒔𝒔 𝒍𝒊𝒇𝒆
@Sweetness_life1 · 291 post UNIONS MERZEM
@Un10nRedd · 21 post Vampire's lair #кусачие
@Vampireslair64 · 371 post

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

litmix — 🤍
@rk_litmix · 683 posts ˖ ׄ 𝒜𝓋ℯ𝓁𝒾𝒶
@byavelia · 1771 post infᴏ 𝙘𝙧𝙤𝙨𝙨𝙚𝙙 𝙨𝙞𝙣𝙣𝙚𝙧𝙨
@crossedsinners · 1641 post 𓈒ϱɳʈɼσρƴ ƒɭσσ∂ ιηƒσ‗ ❍
@entropyfloodrc · 6711 post 𝗛𝗬𝗣𝗘 𝗛𝗨𝗧 𝗶𝗻𝗳𝗼👀
@HypehutFlood · 1411 post ᴋᴇɴᴏᴘsʏ ғʟᴏᴏᴅ ✧
@kenopsy_flood · 3171 post ⁀ ' ₊최고였다˚ꪑꪱꪀt r𖦹ઽ٤s ᠻ†᥆᥆𝓭 ꪱꪀᠻo ° . 🫧
@mintrosesfloodinfo · 391 post 𝑽𝑰𝑽𝑨𝑳𝑬𝑵𝑻 / 𝑰𝑵𝑭𝑶
@vivalents · 2001 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝑫𝑨𝑰𝑹𝑰𝑺” (@dairis_vampirs), 145 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dairis_vampirs.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.