Channel
@daintlace
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
88subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003908064045 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @daintlace |
| Description | your sweet daintlace @creham mot2al |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 30 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/daintlace |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 15:46 | 88 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 05:18 | 88 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (30 July 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 527 |
| Reactions total | 4 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 15:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
4 reactions across 3 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 4 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ᅠ ♥️.. love was néver part 𝑜𝒻 the plán: some love stories begin with perfect timing. theirs began with perfect chaos. ୵ᅠ كوميديا رومانسية ᅠ୵ for a limited time, selected creations may be requested without any fee. (𝟸𝟶.) é. 9 august, 2026. starts 6 pm.jpg a small celebration for those who have quietly stayed, supported, & waited. ♡ read this rules before: ♡ i. kindly subscribe @lacemints before placing any…
ㅤ concentric rosette. (idr 4.000) harmonious woodland treasure entirely ripe for acquisition: forms ready to take بيت. ❀᳕ㅤׄㅤ🐑🪦 ㅤ
https://t.me/worsyne/10801
ㅤ haven of gossamer idylls has inclined us to perceive that truth and perennial affections are bound to coalesce somehow, dwelling amid fondness and affinity through floral-laced vistas and golden radiance. friday, august 7, 2026. @marecaine revealing our essences for us to cherish the boundless flow of life, a benevolent offering bestowed without reciprocation. 🌺✷ ㅤ
@sartorialpoise is quietly opening its doors to new mutuals. if you’re using a main account or managing a profile-needs account, we’d be delighted to have you join our carefully curated circle. ⟡ please contact: @sartorialpoisebot
ㅤㅤㅤ roses-tinged letter from @cortemails, seeking for new pristine comrades. ♥︎ there lingers a douceur yet to be knitted. to entwine that pristine douceur, this tralucent invitation is extended to whosoever wishes to entwine tenderness amidst the forenoon droplets / accepted business types: writing commissions and profile needs! do contact cortemails.com to knit the douceur! 🦌♥️ ㅤㅤㅤ
APK PREM. Stream Editing Listening Ai & Study GAME NEEDS. Top Up Mobile Legends Top Up Free fire Top Up Roblox Top Up Pubg TRANSACTION. Convert Jasa pinjam qris Jasa dana kaget Jasa spay kaget Jasa gopay kaget TELEGRAM NEEDS. Telegram Premium (via login & gift) Telegram Stars (via top up & gift) Telegram Stars (via react) Boost TANPA FORMAT!
ㅤㅤㅤㅤ 𝙼𝙸𝚂𝚃𝚂-𝙾𝙵-𝙱𝙻𝙸𝚂𝚂: slowly unlaces a kist of promise, that always jam-packed with poppet ૮ ☘ mailbox 's ა amidst charming knitted pocket of £12.000 dreamy tuft /. sweetly adored @ebonbonsbot 🌸 🌨 ⭒꒱ྀིა ㅤㅤㅤ
ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ ⋆ 🍴 pastel boulevard &. illumes: 🎀 carte… 𝒫 velvet polka pastel dotted gyaruo lullaby soft polkas piano: 15.000 idr drawn tinted whispers, heartened card boule forms; to-be claimed. call to order @Gyaruuo ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ
done diving moots, kalau ada yang tertinggal reach out @dropangelsbot / @senyumx yaa
Sticker, posted without a caption
ㅤ 🪽ᣟ◌ / 8.000 features thoughtfully appointed heirlooms timeless refinements awaiting their rightful household send mails to deerlips@bot!♥️⠀ ㅤㅤ
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @daintlace. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 875,458 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“@𝚍𝚕. (soon) ☁️” (@daintlace), 88 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/daintlace.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.