Silly 🍉😊 cr: 𝚖𝚙𝚑_𝚖𝚘𝚝𝚝 on twitter
🔥23🍓12❤7👍4💋4💅1

Channel
@dailysapnap
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
121subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001824016895 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dailysapnap |
| Created | 1 January 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 8 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dailysapnap |
Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 26 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Sept 2026, 07:17 | 121 | +2 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 23:59 | 119 | -2 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 16:24 | 121 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 00:24 | 122 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 03:16 | 123 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:49 | 123 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 5 August 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 August 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
507 reactions across 15 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5377354360885881863 | 108 | 21.3% | |
| 🔥 | 107 | 21.1% | |
| custom 5363956171751299843 | 93 | 18.3% | |
| ❤ | 54 | 10.7% | |
| 😍 | 54 | 10.7% | |
| 🍓 | 45 | 8.88% | |
| 👍 | 11 | 2.17% | |
| 🐳 | 8 | 1.58% | |
| 💋 | 8 | 1.58% | |
| ⚡ | 6 | 1.18% | |
| ❤🔥 | 4 | 0.789% | |
| 🤝 | 4 | 0.789% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 0.592% | |
| 🆒 | 1 | 0.197% | |
| 💅 | 1 | 0.197% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 507 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2024 to 27 August 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Silly 🍉😊 cr: 𝚖𝚙𝚑_𝚖𝚘𝚝𝚝 on twitter
🔥23🍓12❤7👍4💋4💅1
В поле цветов затерялся 🤲 cr: 𝙼𝚒𝚔𝚊𝚗𝚜𝚑𝚒𝚒𝚕𝚘𝚕 on twitter
😍21❤9🍓4🔥4❤🔥3
Such a small 🥹🥹
🔥28❤8⚡5🍓4👍1
🫀🌷 cr: 𝚌𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚌𝚑𝚊𝚖𝚜 on twitter
🍓25💋4❤3🔥2⚡1
His eyes 🥹😊 cr: 𝚒𝚕𝚜𝚠3𝚛𝚝 on tiktok
custom 536395617175129984319❤6🔥5custom 53773543608858818632
Скейтеррр🤏 cr: 𝚖𝚒𝚕𝚎𝚜 on twitter
🔥20custom 536395617175129984310❤4custom 53773543608858818633
😏😏 cr: 𝚓𝚊𝚒𝚍𝚊_𝚍𝚊𝚗𝚊𝚎𝚊𝚛𝚝 on twitter
custom 537735436088588186314❤3custom 53639561717512998433
I miss him😔😔 cr: dartheviewerr on tiktok
custom 537735436088588186315🤝4❤2custom 53639561717512998432
Yummy!! 🐼🐼 cr: 𝙲𝙻𝙾𝚃𝙷𝙴𝚂_𝚈𝙸𝙵𝚄 on twitter
custom 537735436088588186318custom 53639561717512998435❤2😍2🔥1
💐💐🫶 cr: 𝙽𝚒𝚌𝚘 on twitter
custom 536395617175129984316👍6😁3custom 53773543608858818633🔥2
Omgg.. Sap 🙏🙏🫦 cr: 𝚍𝚝𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚏𝚙 on tiktok
custom 537735436088588186317custom 53639561717512998438❤2🔥1
Swettie🤲 cr: 𝚜𝚊𝚙𝚗𝚊𝚙𝚜𝚌𝚕𝚒𝚋𝚋𝚕𝚎𝚜 on twitter
custom 537735436088588186318🐳8custom 53639561717512998435❤2🔥2🆒1
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @dailysapnap. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“(NON)-daily sapnap !” (@dailysapnap), 121 subscribers as measured 29 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dailysapnap.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.