:)
Signed P

Channel
@daily_of_Entp
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,165subscribers
+24 since we began measuring on 27 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002068449839 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @daily_of_Entp |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 27 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/daily_of_Entp |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept 2026, 15:21 | 1,165 | +24 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 12:00 | 1,141 | +2 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 22:27 | 1,139 | -2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 02:35 | 1,141 | no change |
| 27 Aug 2026, 22:30 | 1,141 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (25 July 2026 – 26 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,640 |
| Reactions total | 6 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 27 Aug 2026, 22:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
6 reactions across 3 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 50.0% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 33.3% | |
| 🏆 | 1 | 16.7% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 26 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @daily_of_Entp. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 July 2026 to 26 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
:)
Signed P
کنکور زبان انگلیسیم زدم ، احتمالأ اگر شرکت کننده بودم هیچی نمیشدم اکثر گزینه ها اصطلاحات نادر بودن ( خیلیاشون و حتی متون هم کلماتی بودن که آمریکایی ها استفاده نمی کنن و تو فرهنگ امریکایی نیستن، انگلیسی های بریتانیا استفاده میکنن) جواب 2 تا سوالم که اصطلاح عامیانه بود ( اصطلاحاتی که استفاده کردن ازشون حتی تو آمریکا و خیابونم خیلی نادره) در کل طراح کثیف بود ...
Signed P
یه سوال فیزیک بود که همه میگفتن جواب تو گزینه ها نبوده ، صرفا طراح سوال سر سوال رو اشتباه نوشته بود و یادش رفته بود یه تبدیل رو به متن سوال اضافه کنه( بعد از تبدیل جواب میشد گزینه 3 که همون 66 میشد )
Signed P
Posted without readable text
فیزیک کنکور تجربی رو حل کردم و نظرم اینه فیزیک متوسط رو به بالا بود ( نمیشه گفت خیلی سخت چون با قطعیت نمیشه گفت همه مباحث سخت بودن ) و میشد 20 تست حل کرد ( زمان رو بین این 20 است تقسیم کرده باشین و سراغ باقی تست ها نرفته باشین) سوالاتی که مربوط به مقاومت بود واقعا طولانی بودن و اکثرا باید بیشتر از تایمی که برای هر سوال دادن روش تمرکز و وقت گذاشت تا حل بشن و 5 تستی که از مفاهیم و حفظیات داده بودن به نسبت آسون بودن ( …
❤3
Signed P
قراره تو دیلیم فعال تر باشم و مطمئنا پست ها رو تو گپتون فروارد میزنم ( نمیخوام جوین شین فقط میخوام افراد بیشتری پست ها رو ببینن) پست ها ممکنه از هر چیزی باشن اما سعی بر این دارم که مفید باشن ( چه راجب علم ، چه راجب شعر و هنر و.. ) مرسی که تحمل میکنید و امیدوارم مطالب مفید باشن
Signed P
ولی محبوب من ، خودمانیم بلانسبت خر، وقتی نامه هایی که برایت نوشته ام و هیچکدام را ارسال نکرده ام میخوانم گاهی تو را خدای کوچک من خطاب میکردم ، برای آدمی که ادعای هوش و توانایی میکند این یک خریت و حماقت محض است ..
🔥2
Signed P
شرحی ز حال و حالی ز شرح نیست
Signed P
احتمالا اگر من تو اوپن مدال بگیرم اسپانسرام مجاب کنم برم بازی بارسا و رئال از نزدیک ببینم 🥹😂 دعا کنید یه مدال بهم بدن حالا هر چی بود فرق نداره برنز بود ، برنجی بود یا اصلا آلمینیومی بود فقط مدال باشه
🏆1
Signed P
یک مسئله بهم دادن و قراره ازش یک مقاله کامل بنویسم فرض کنید شما یک ماشین زمان دارید( خوش به حالتون) ، بعدش به گذشته سفر میکنید و جلوی اشنایی والدینتون رو میگیرید و به وجود نمی آید ( نتیجه محتمل !) پس اونی که شما رو پاک کرده کیه ؟ چطور به وجود اومده ؟ بهترین جواب با اسم خودش در مقاله ذکر میشه ( لطفا از هوش مصنوعی استفاده نکنید و از ذهن خلاقتون استفاده کنید )
Signed P
شاهکار از زشت ترین نابغه ریاضی دنیا
Signed P
و یک مرد امروز متولد شد ...
Signed P
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @daily_of_Entp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ryodan” (@daily_of_Entp), 1,165 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/daily_of_Entp.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.