Channel
@dahbmofeda
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
3,070subscribers
-14 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002138439398 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dahbmofeda |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dahbmofeda |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 07:55 | 3,070 | -10 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 18:21 | 3,080 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:03 | 3,084 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:54 | 3,084 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 8 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
1,301 reactions across 19 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 588 | 45.2% | |
| ❤ | 394 | 30.3% | |
| 😁 | 167 | 12.8% | |
| 😢 | 125 | 9.61% | |
| 👎 | 20 | 1.54% | |
| 🤔 | 7 | 0.538% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,301reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 April 2026 to 30 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
اسمعلك حاجة مفيدة pinned «السلام عليكم ورحمة الله... انا قررت ابعد عن التليجرام لفترة من الوقت... من دلوقتى انا حسابي مقفول علشان مفيش يفكر اني بتعمد عدم الرد عليه... على اليوتيوب فيه فيديو نهارا وبث ليلا فيهم كل شيئ... دمتم في أمان الله»
السلام عليكم ورحمة الله... انا قررت ابعد عن التليجرام لفترة من الوقت... من دلوقتى انا حسابي مقفول علشان مفيش يفكر اني بتعمد عدم الرد عليه... على اليوتيوب فيه فيديو نهارا وبث ليلا فيهم كل شيئ... دمتم في أمان الله
😢96❤35👍26👎8😁3
https://youtu.be/gz9u8NYEs8M
❤16👍12
وبعته اليوم وبارك الله فيما رزق
❤42👍19😁4😢1
هو مكتبوش الاجتماع ده للأسف مش عارف نسي والله... بس انا برضه دورت عليه وشيرت القديم... وربنا مايقطع لينا عادة
😁35❤20👍6
⭕ هناك حالة من عدم الرضى داخل الفيدرالي الأمريكي تجاه الارتفاع الكبير في أسعار الذهب 🏛🇺🇸 ⚠️ من المحتمل أن يلمّح جيروم باول اليوم إلى هذا الأمر بشكل مباشر، وقد يُظهر موقفًا يشير إلى أن مستويات الذهب الحالية غير منطقية أو مبالغ فيها — وهو ما قد يشكّل عاصفة هبوطية قوية على المعدن الأصفر. ✅ تذكير تاريخي : في عام 2011، عندما صعد الذهب إلى مستوى 1930 دولارًا، خرج رئيس الفيدرالي آنذاك بتصريح قال فيه إن “سعر الذهب مبالغ في…
😁24❤11👎1
انا اشتريت جزء كمان
❤27👍13😁3
لسة محتارين اهو مرة علشان بنك اليابان ثبت الفائدة... ومرة علشان الفيدرالي بكرة... بس والله مافيه حد هيقولك علشان الفاصل الزمني يوم الجمعة الساعة 8 😢
👍41❤18😁12
🔴السؤال الأهم لماذا يتراجع الذهب رغم التوترات؟ ⬅️ قوة الدولار + 📈 ارتفاع العوائد = ضغط مباشر على الذهب 🛢️ النفط المرتفع ➜ توقع تشديد الفائدة ➜ دعم الدولار 🔺 جني أرباح بعد صعود قوي ⚖️ السوق سبق وسعّر الحرب : ⬅️الذهب يتحرك مع الدولار والفائدة أكثر من الأخبار وليس كل توتر = صعود للذهب ------------------------------------------------------- 🎖™ ️قناة تحليل اسواق المال العالمية ™️🎖 @Markets_Analytics -----------------…
👍12❤2
840 880
👍20❤9
حد فاكر الفاصل الزمني بتاع يوم الجمعة الساعة 8... الناس مش مصدقة الفاصل وبتدور علي سبب للوقعة دي.... جاري البحث في الاخبار عن سبب 😂
👍37❤12😁9
ورديت منه الثلث وان كنت مش متفائل للي بيحصل... بس اهو كسبان أفضل من اني اكون فاضي... ربنا يستر
👍47❤10😁7
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @dahbmofeda. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“اسمعلك حاجة مفيدة” (@dahbmofeda), 3,070 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dahbmofeda.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.