🤩~♪ CW: Suggestive Какое-то гамно Тгк: https://t.me/+iOR_-EWt76pjY2Qy Неанон правый сапог 👢 🤖: ВОУ 😳😳😳 🤩 #тейк @daftpunkcfbot 🤩
custom 54542669387105777709custom 54565210792814356959❤6💋1💘1

Channel
@daftpunkcf
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
66subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003076005643 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @daftpunkcf |
| Description | (cr @b_y_n_d) |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/daftpunkcf |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 03:30 | 66 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 03:16 | 66 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 27 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
239 reactions across 12 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 73 | 30.5% | |
| custom 5456521079281435695 | 60 | 25.1% | |
| custom 5454266938710577770 | 57 | 23.8% | |
| 🐳 | 15 | 6.28% | |
| 🍾 | 9 | 3.77% | |
| 🎄 | 7 | 2.93% | |
| 💋 | 6 | 2.51% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 2.51% | |
| 💘 | 4 | 1.67% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 0.837% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 239reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 27 December 2025 to 25 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🤩~♪ CW: Suggestive Какое-то гамно Тгк: https://t.me/+iOR_-EWt76pjY2Qy Неанон правый сапог 👢 🤖: ВОУ 😳😳😳 🤩 #тейк @daftpunkcfbot 🤩
custom 54542669387105777709custom 54565210792814356959❤6💋1💘1
🤩~♪ Какие т зарисовочки йоу Неанон правый сапог 👢 Тгк: https://t.me/+iOR_-EWt76pjY2Qy 🤖: АААА КАКАЯ МИЛОТААА(((( И спасибо за оформу!!! Желаю чтобы обе стороны подушки были прохладными <3333 🤩 #тейк @daftpunkcfbot 🤩
❤8💋3💘3🔥3
🤩~♪ Сегодня альбому Discovery исполнилось 25 лет! Япееее!! 🤩 #адмтейк @daftpunkcfbot 🤩
custom 545652107928143569512custom 54542669387105777705🍾4
🤩~♪ (cr kiropanyu tumblr) 8 февраля у Ги-Мана была днюшка!! Поздравляем его <33 🤩 #адмтейк @daftpunkcfbot 🤩
custom 545426693871057777013❤6🍾2custom 54565210792814356952
🤩~♪ Хоспаде я совсем забыл скинуть кассету с дафт панкерами которую мне подарили на новый год (Уже раз 10 переслушал каждую сторону кассеты) Хз надо писать неанон но короче спудер пери я 🤖: Ой как здоровски! Поздравляю с приобретением <3 🤩 #тейк @daftpunkcfbot 🤩
❤10custom 54542669387105777704custom 54565210792814356954
🤩~♪ 🤖: О БОГИ, Я ЖДАЛ КОГДА РУССКИЕ СДЕЛАЮТ АДАПТАЦИЮ ЭТОГО... Спасибо что поделились! :) 🤩 #тейк @daftpunkcfbot 🤩
❤7custom 54542669387105777705custom 54565210792814356953
🤩~♪ (cr @Qilme395290 X) Вчера у Томаса Бангальтера было день рождение! Запоздало поздравляем? 🥹 🤩 #адмтейк @daftpunkcfbot 🤩
custom 545652107928143569511❤8🍾3💋2custom 54542669387105777701
🤩~♪ Поздравляю вас с новым 2026 годом! Пусть мы появились не так давно, но всё равно мы словно прошли вместе очень долгий путь! Надеюсь в новом году нас будут ждать не менее крутые новости по Daft Punk и их участникам :3 Тоже похвастаемся своими итогами года 👀 🤩 #адмтейк @daftpunkcfbot 🤩
❤9🔥3👍2custom 54542669387105777702custom 54565210792814356952
🤩~♪ 😮 🤩 #адмтейк @daftpunkcfbot 🤩
❤9custom 54542669387105777705custom 54565210792814356955
🤩~♪ ГАЙС УРА 🤩 #адмтейк @daftpunkcfbot 🤩
❤7custom 54542669387105777707custom 54565210792814356956🐳1
🤩~♪ Они реально умеют петь Неанон правый сапог 👢 🤩 #тейк @daftpunkcfbot 🤩
🐳11❤3custom 54542669387105777703custom 54565210792814356953
🤩~♪ Оформляемся под новогодний вайбик, чтобы зарядить настроем и вас! 🤖🤖❤️ Плюс добавили новогодние реакты! 🤩 #адмтейк @daftpunkcfbot 🤩
🎄7🐳3custom 54542669387105777703custom 54565210792814356953
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @daftpunkcf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,121,314 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@daftpunkcf named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Daft Punk confession + timely!” (@daftpunkcf), 66 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/daftpunkcf.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.