Vouch @dadyskyler for using my @Dealer service for 1200$

Channel
Bunduq ππππΎπππ
@dadyskylar1
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry
16subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002542992860 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dadyskylar1 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dadyskylar1 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 03:59 | 16 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 20:46 | 17 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:08 | 17 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 15 October 2025 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR Β· 30 days
- 218.8%
- avg views Γ· 16 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 35.0
- 4 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- β
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 4
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· viewsβ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (15 October 2025 β 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 140 |
| Reactions total | β |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 20:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
308 reactions across 15 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 13.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| β€βπ₯ | 42 | 13.6% | |
| π | 41 | 13.3% | |
| π― | 35 | 11.4% | |
| π₯° | 35 | 11.4% | |
| π | 34 | 11.0% | |
| β€ | 31 | 10.1% | |
| π€© | 30 | 9.74% | |
| π₯ | 29 | 9.42% | |
| π | 29 | 9.42% | |
| π | 2 | 0.649% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 308reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 October 2025 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Vouch @dadyskyler for using my @Dealer service for 1900$
Vouch @dadyskyler for using my @Dealer service for 1900$
Vouch @dadyskyler for using my @Dealer service for 2960$
Vouch @dadyskyler for using my @MMThon service for 1000$
Vouch for @dadyskyler, Thanks for using my @interveil service for $150, Much Appreciated! π€
π₯°7β€βπ₯6π―5π€©5π4π4β€2π2
Vouch @dadyskyler for using my @MMThon service for 780$
π―4π₯°4β€3π3π3π2β€βπ₯1π₯1
Vouch @dadyskyler For Using My @FastestMM Service For $250 Smooth Deal
π7π₯4β€3β€βπ₯3π€©3π₯°3π2π―2
Vouch @dadyskyler for using my @MMThon service for 1100$
π6β€βπ₯5π₯5π₯°5π€©4π4π3β€2
Vouch @dadyskyler for using my @MMThon service for 400$
β€6π6π₯4π€©4π2π2π₯°1
Vouch @dadyskyler for using my @MMThon service for 170$
π4β€3β€βπ₯3π―3π3π2π₯2π€©2
Vouch @dadyskyler for using my @MMThon service for 500$
π4π3π―3π₯3π3β€βπ₯2π₯°2π€©1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @dadyskylar1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βBunduq ππππΎπππβ (@dadyskylar1), 16 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dadyskylar1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.