🤑 Step 7 of 7: ICO of The Open Network?
🔥4❤3custom 54249126840783485333🌭1🐳1

Channel
@dadnull
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
9,150subscribers
-87 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002119463460 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @dadnull @tonarcade |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dadnull |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:23 | 9,150 | -4 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:15 | 9,154 | -43 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 15:31 | 9,197 | -7 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 02:32 | 9,204 | -18 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:46 | 9,222 | -9 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:11 | 9,231 | -5 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:40 | 9,236 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:51 | 9,237 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:33 | 9,237 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 30 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
339 reactions across 16 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 15.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 54 | 15.9% | |
| custom 5424912684078348533 | 53 | 15.6% | |
| ❤ | 43 | 12.7% | |
| 💯 | 43 | 12.7% | |
| 😁 | 26 | 7.67% | |
| ⚡ | 22 | 6.49% | |
| ❤🔥 | 22 | 6.49% | |
| 🌭 | 20 | 5.90% | |
| 👍 | 17 | 5.01% | |
| 🤓 | 15 | 4.42% | |
| 💔 | 4 | 1.18% | |
| 😍 | 4 | 1.18% | |
| 🙏 | 4 | 1.18% | |
| 🐳 | 3 | 0.885% | |
| 🍌 | 2 | 0.59% | |
| 😨 | 2 | 0.59% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 0.295% | |
| 💩 | 1 | 0.295% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 0.295% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 0.295% | |
| 1 further kind | 1 | 0.295% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 339reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 30 October 2025 to 1 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dadnull. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 October 2025 to 1 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🤑 Step 7 of 7: ICO of The Open Network?
🔥4❤3custom 54249126840783485333🌭1🐳1
📸 Смотришь на фотографии 35-летней давности и велика вероятность, что они чeрно-белые или в сепии. Сейчас ты снимаешь на 120-граммовый слиток алюминия и инженерного совершенства – и в итоге получаешь довольно глубокую, детализированную картину. Мы уже сейчас можем оставить яркий и точный след в истории. И вот подумалось. А ведь через тот же промежуток времени, возможно, у нас появятся условные «голофоны» - как iPho…
❤🔥9💯3🔥3🍌2❤1🌭1
Давно не пишу! Это у меня в шкафчике-серверной, на ESP-32-S3. До всей этой затеи было 34-35°C. После создания сие-киберразумие - опустилось до 31°C. А сегодня вспомнил, что там на плюсовой ножке вентиляторов резистор на 147Ω (LNA), чтобы ограничить RPM. Убрал, прирост 2000 RPM → 3000 RPM и соответственно, сейчас даже при 65% оборотах (2300 RPM) меньше градусов, чем было: 29.1°C. Если на 100% подкрутить настройки, т…
❤10⚡5🔥4🎉1👍1
С Новым годом! 🙃
😁15custom 542491268407834853310❤🔥4💯3
Давно не пишу. А тут настроение такое написабельное. Есть такое ощущение, что нынче поколения меняются раз в 8-10 лет. Под поколением имеется ввиду совокупность измененных факторов в группе людей, равнозначных по возрасту и равнозначно отделенных до возраста 8-10 лет. Меняется субкультура, меняются интересы, меняется стиль жизни, меняются взгляды на мир. Это прекрасно. Получается за тот же короткий отрывок жизни, мо…
❤🔥9⚡6🔥5❤1🕊1
QE - 12 Dec, 2025. Ну, что, полетим походу все же. Станочек вари. ⬆️ Напомню, это не биток растет, а доллар падает. 1 актив всегда равен 1 активу. #crypto
😁5🔥4🙏4🐳2custom 54249126840783485331
🤖 За кулисами AI-восторга: мои ретроградные мысли. Все вокруг восхваляют AI-рынки, поют что-то поючее и прогнозируют бесконечный рост. Попробую поделиться своими ретроградными прогнозами и личным видением развития событий с рыночной точки зрения, которая также и коснется консюмерской стороны. И так, погнали! 🛡 База Начнем с базового: в индексе S&P500 TOP-7 компаний формируют около 38% капитализации. Это - Amazon, M…
⚡5💯5🔥4❤2👍2
❤️ Интересные времена у TON. Ностальгирую по 2022–2023 гг., когда фокус был на комьюнити-разработчиках, совместных инициативах и реально полезных продуктах, нацеленных на улучшение экосистемы. Когда ощущалась причастность каждого - как звена одной идеи. Сколько крутых знакомств это дало. Как лампово и без корысти инженеры поддерживали друг друга, строили, спорили, создавали. Плюсом, все это поощрялось TON Foundatio…
💯14custom 54249126840783485337❤5💔4
📜 Археология TON (TL;DR) Пока рынки краснеют от стыда, поделюсь с вами артефактом, тем самым, с которого начался весь хайп и ICO на миллиарды. 💬 Ключевые фразы в документе: ------------- 1. Нет криптовалюты, которая может стать массовой. TON будет первой. 2. 52% токенов резервируются для защиты от спекуляций. 3. Wallet inside Telegram станет самым массовым криптокошельком в мире. 4. TON будет обрабатывать миллио…
custom 54249126840783485338🔥7🤓5❤2👍1
«Ивент календарь» на 2026 от The Economist. Берегите себя и близких, старайтесь чаще использовать критическое мышление, как бы мозг не сопротивлялся и не предлагал энергосберегающий режим (интуитив).
❤8💯8👍7😢1
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥11❤7😍4⚡2
🍦 Ознакомился, значит, с NFT Два.Ноль. Концепция NFT 2.0 заключается в защите роялти авторов от злоупотребления. На TON существуют стандарты TEP‑62 и TEP‑64 для NFT, а также стандарты по роялти - TEP‑66. 📍 Проблема: Формально можно задать роялти-параметры, но само их исполнение не гарантируется, так как нет технического единого механизма принуждения. В результате создатели коллекций получают доход лишь при первично…
custom 54249126840783485338👍6💯5🤓3🌭1
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @dadnull. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 883,705 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“dad {ɴᴜʟʟ}” (@dadnull), 9,150 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dadnull.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.