Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Группа Dabro

@dabro_music

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry

24,123subscribers

-63 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001045945598
TypeChannel
Username@dabro_music
Created26 February 2016measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/dabro_music

Growth

24,12324,18624,154.55 August 2026 — 24,186 subscribers6 August 2026 — 24,186 subscribers6 August 2026 — 24,175 subscribers8 August 2026 — 24,162 subscribers8 August 2026 — 24,150 subscribers9 August 2026 — 24,152 subscribers11 August 2026 — 24,149 subscribers11 August 2026 — 24,140 subscribers12 August 2026 — 24,142 subscribers14 August 2026 — 24,132 subscribers15 August 2026 — 24,123 subscribers5 August 202615 August 2026
11 measurements spanning 10 days, net -63. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 24,114–24,195 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 19:2624,123-9
14 Aug 2026, 05:1924,132-10
12 Aug 2026, 23:5424,142+2
11 Aug 2026, 22:5924,140-9
11 Aug 2026, 00:4724,149-3
9 Aug 2026, 21:5024,152+2
8 Aug 2026, 22:2124,150-12
8 Aug 2026, 01:4724,162-13
6 Aug 2026, 22:2224,175-11
6 Aug 2026, 02:0324,186no change
5 Aug 2026, 23:2724,186first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 4 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
21.7%
avg views ÷ 24,123 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,220
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
10.5%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held18 (4 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total78,340
Reactions total8,216
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 16:44 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 26s
Average length
21s

Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

10,095 reactions across 18 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6,56565.0%
custom 54296356276855236052,26922.5%
🔥6146.08%
custom 54067591930529951733083.05%
👍2612.59%
👏780.773%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10,095reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
53
across the posts below
Posts paid on
18
of 18 we hold a reading for · 100%
Most on one post
11
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dabro_music. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 19:40 UTC≈2,700 views637 reactions4 Starsread 15 August 2026
Video

Песня «Ты знаешь, мам» вышла 3 года назад! Сколько сердец было согрето благодаря ей❤️

481custom 5429635627685523605109👍29🔥10custom 54067591930529951735👏3

8 Aug 2026, 20:51 UTC≈4,040 views470 reactions2 Starsread 15 August 2026
Video

Мы знали, что нас ждут, но не догадывались, что настолько! Добавляем Мордовию в тур «Мой путь»? За обновлениями следите на сайте dabroconcert.com

322custom 542963562768552360591👍26🔥22custom 54067591930529951735👏4

8 Aug 2026, 15:12 UTC≈3,980 views491 reactions3 Starsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Мы уже на месте. Мордовия, встречай! Сегодня ждём всех в Ардатове на фестивале, чтобы поставить звук на всю. Шумбрат!

332custom 542963562768552360591🔥50custom 54067591930529951739👍8👏1

8 Aug 2026, 08:23 UTC≈4,300 views467 reactions2 Starsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Воронеж, вы сами знаете, как было круто! Это может стать хорошей традицией - собираться у вас каждое лето на открытой площадке. Спасибо всем, кто был! Ближайшие концерты dabroconcert.com

322custom 542963562768552360586🔥45👍8custom 54067591930529951734👏2

5 Aug 2026, 18:42 UTC≈4,080 views512 reactions1 Starread 15 August 2026
Video

Да, бывает тоже нелегко. Только мы ведь о себе ещё напомним!

354custom 542963562768552360593🔥44custom 540675919305299517311👍10

4 Aug 2026, 19:07 UTC≈4,510 views570 reactions1 Starread 15 August 2026
Video

Так звучит мой август!

389custom 5429635627685523605112👍34🔥21custom 540675919305299517312👏2

29 Jul 2026, 09:12 UTC≈6,910 views715 reactions4 Starsread 15 August 2026
Video

Когда веришь в то, что делаешь!

461custom 5429635627685523605153🔥72👍11👏9custom 54067591930529951739

27 Jul 2026, 10:21 UTC≈6,570 views472 reactions1 Starread 15 August 2026
Photo

Скоро объявим вторую часть тура «Мой путь», а пока напомним про ближайшие концерты, где презентуем трек «На счастье» Билеты - dabroconcert.com

339custom 542963562768552360584👍21🔥17custom 54067591930529951736👏5

24 Jul 2026, 19:48 UTC≈7,030 views619 reactions3 Starsread 15 August 2026
Video

Ну что, сколько раз послушали песню? Наши соседи её слушали уже неделю, но сегодня впервые официально!

410custom 5429635627685523605134🔥48👍14custom 54067591930529951738👏5

23 Jul 2026, 21:00 UTC≈7,190 views571 reactions4 Starsread 15 August 2026

Песня «На счастье» уже в сети! Сразу с атмосферным видео для лучшего погружения в наш мир🔥 https://youtu.be/ZLM8lMCf6nM

372custom 5429635627685523605116🔥56👍16custom 54067591930529951737👏4

23 Jul 2026, 15:07 UTC≈5,540 views534 reactions3 Starsread 15 August 2026
Video

Сегодня в 00:00 премьера «На счастье». Может сразу с клипом? Делайте пресейв, чтобы услышать песню первым - https://band.link/QnQHN

353custom 5429635627685523605114🔥51👍10custom 54067591930529951734👏2

22 Jul 2026, 10:28 UTC≈5,260 views512 reactions11 Starsread 15 August 2026
Video

Хватит искать смысл внутри, он ведь и так со всех сторон! «На счастье» 24 июля Делай пресейв - https://band.link/QnQHN

337custom 5429635627685523605112🔥41custom 540675919305299517312👍6👏4

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @dabro_music. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 101,164 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Хижина музыканта
@arslan_music · 128,457
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 14 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cross-platform identity — Wikidata

A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.

Q104450776 on Wikidata, read 9 August 2026
LabelDabro
DescriptionRussian musical duo of Ukrainian origin
YouTubeUCWd_ibVjSFOkm25PK27LDsQ
Official sitehttps://dabroconcert.com/

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Группа Dabro” (@dabro_music), 24,123 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dabro_music.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.