Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

就该这么办呀!⸝⸝ ᷇࿀ ᷆⸝⸝

@dQvQp

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

445subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003888430031
TypeChannel
Username@dQvQp
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/dQvQp

Growth

44510 Aug 2026, 02:31 — 445 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 12:41 — 445 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 02:3110 Aug 2026, 12:41
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 444–446 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 12:41445no change
10 Aug 2026, 02:31445first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 7 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
21.3%
avg views ÷ 445 subscribers
Avg views / post
94.9
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
14
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held14 (7 August 20269 August 2026)
Views total1,328
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 02:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
8m 01s
Average length
2m 40s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 03:41 UTC85 viewsread 10 August 2026
File

「选择失忆」- 季彦霖 专辑: 选择失忆 - EP 29.45MB 876.37kbps #AppleMusic #无损 #m4a via @Music163DownBot #今日歌曲 #好听死了 #耳朵怀孕了

9 Aug 2026, 03:19 UTC85 viewsread 10 August 2026
File

你就这样出现闯进我心里面(0.8x) - 庄东茹(豆芽鱼)/LvJam 音质: 超清母带 大小: 99.49 MB #今日歌曲 #好听死了 #耳朵怀孕了

8 Aug 2026, 22:43 UTC103 viewsread 10 August 2026

iOS(TestFlight版)第三方电报Nextgram testflight.apple.com/join/8YjnJrwY @nextgramios 频道🇺🇸 @nextgramru 频道(俄语)🇷🇺 @nextgram_ru 群组(针对俄语用户)🇷🇺 @nextgramchat(针对英语用户。请仅用英文填写)🇺🇸 网站💻 nextgram.pro

8 Aug 2026, 10:50 UTC108 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

中国在1965年成功人工合成结晶牛胰岛素,这是世界上首次人工合成活性蛋白质,无疑是一项世界级的重大科学突破。然而最终未能获得诺贝尔化学奖,主要原因可以归结为以下几个关键因素: 1. 提名人数超过诺奖规则限制(最直接的原因) 诺贝尔奖委员会有一条非常严格的铁律:单项奖项的共享人数最多不能超过3人。 参与人数众多: 中国的人工合成胰岛素项目是由中国科学院上海生物化学研究所、上海有机化学研究所和北京大学三家单位联合攻关完成的,参与的科研人员多达数十人。 集体主义导向: 当时处于特定的历史时期,强调“集体主义”和“集体智慧”,不鼓励突出个人成就。 提名人选争议: 1978年诺贝尔奖委员会(通过杨振宁等学者)邀请中国提名候选人时,中国内部在提名人选上产生了分歧。最初曾考虑提名整个团队,但这直接违背了诺奖规则;后来拟定的名单人数也超过了3人限制(曾提出过纽经义、邹承鲁、季爱雪、王应睐等多人的组合)。最终虽然主要推荐了纽经义一人,但

8 Aug 2026, 10:47 UTC101 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

人工合成牛胰岛素未获诺贝尔奖核心原因总结 1. 科学定位:属于工程实现,缺少原创理论/新方法 合成用的化学反应、技术路线都是国外已经发明的。我国是把已有技术,克服巨大困难,首次做出有活性的结晶产物,属于高水平工程攻关,不是开创全新科学原理。诺奖化学奖更看重新发现、新方法。 2. 错过了最佳提名时间窗口 1965年出成果,之后受时代环境影响,学术对外交流中断。等到正式提交提名参评已是1979年,距离成果已经过去14年,该方向科研热度已经消退。 3. 诺奖规则和集体项目的矛盾 该项目是上百人的大型集体协作。诺奖科学奖不给团体,最多只能选3位个人。很难挑选少数几人代表整个团队,最终只报送钮经义一人,评审层面存在现实障碍。 4. 关键复性实验成果发表滞后 A、B链重组复性的实践证据,发表晚于国外安芬森的相关理论,没能抢占理论上的优先权。 补充:并非主动拒绝诺奖,也不是因为想提名超过3个人而落选,这两个是流传的谣言。国际科学界本身高度

8 Aug 2026, 10:43 UTC97 viewsread 10 August 2026

可以冲诺奖了。但是诺奖是颁给个人的。之前我国人工合成胰岛素也可以拿诺奖的,但是因为是团队荣誉所以没拿。

8 Aug 2026, 10:42 UTC96 viewsread 10 August 2026
Video

纯力构成的物质,真的存在! 人类找了五十年的胶球,终于被中国科学家证实了!没有夸克、没有原子,纯粹由强作用力凝聚而成的实体,打破了我们对 “物质” 的固有定义。 ▎Source

8 Aug 2026, 10:40 UTC91 viewsread 10 August 2026
Video

科研人员确证新型粒子“胶球”的存在 新华社北京8月6日电(记者刘祯)记者6日从中国科学院高能物理所获悉,我国科研人员领衔的北京谱仪Ⅲ实验国际合作组,历经15年实验研究,首次证明一类全新物质形态——胶球的存在。 自然界中,原子核由质子和中子组成,质子和中子又由夸克组成,夸克之间靠胶子传递强相互作用力。粒子物理学标准模型认为,胶子之间可以相互吸引而形成一种全新的粒子——胶球。但此前,这种粒子从未被实验发现。 依托北京正负电子对撞机上的实验装置北京谱仪Ⅲ,研究团队在2011年发现了一个新粒子X(2370)。2024年,研究团队测得X(2370)的量子态性质与胶球特性一致,为确证胶球存在提供关键证据。 在最新研究中,研究团队发现了多个X(2370)粒子新衰变模式,并且成功测定X(2370)的“味单态”性质,这一性质是胶球区别于其他普通粒子最重要的特性,从而证实X(2370)的主要成分正是胶球。 研究人员表示,这是近五十年来寻找

8 Aug 2026, 09:45 UTC87 viewsread 10 August 2026

所以结论是什么? 是网卡账号,不可能接到短信验证码,没绑邮箱也就不可能绑上了。 这是死局。

8 Aug 2026, 09:40 UTC86 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

我以前以为网站买的电报账号, Api接码接的是短信验证码,其实不是,而是 t.me/+42777 这里的验证码 t.me/TangisanAngin/11153 t.me/TangisanAngin/11163 t.me/TangisanAngin/11649 之前提到过,绑邮箱的步骤是: 输入了一个手机号,然后让你输入邮箱,收到邮箱验证码,输入邮箱验证码,下一步就发手机号短信验证码。 注意!是手机号短信验证码! 这问题就大了,你没办法接到短信验证码啊,你怎么绑定邮箱呢? 因为最后一步就是确定手机号绑定这个邮箱,验证这个手机号是你的,所以他发的是短信验证码,你输入短信验证码之后就登录了,邮箱也就绑定了。 所以一般网卡出厂就自带绑定了邮箱,顶多提醒你一句登录后修改邮箱,而不是绑定邮箱。 t.me/+42777 只收设备码和邮箱验证码是不会收短信验证码的

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @dQvQp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 631,763 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“就该这么办呀!⸝⸝ ᷇࿀ ᷆⸝⸝” (@dQvQp), 445 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dQvQp.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.