Channel
@d3crypt1on
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
103subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001515187670 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @d3crypt1on |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 4 times, most recently 12 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/d3crypt1on |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 27 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept 2026, 10:17 | 103 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 09:15 | 104 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:21 | 104 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 6 May 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 December 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
44 reactions across 15 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 30 | 68.2% | |
| 🔥 | 9 | 20.5% | |
| custom 5354891385575057901 | 2 | 4.55% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 4.55% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 2.27% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 44 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 6 May 2023 to 1 December 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
✉️Новый mini-app, который продвигает Дуров. 🪙#Memhash — это майнилка, которая использует мощности вашего устройства, как биткоин. ✅Сейчас лучшее время залететь, так как в честь черной пятницы они снизили цену входа в три раза (200 звёзд ≈ 2$).
🔥3
#STRK Всех поздравляю 🙌 Часть можно фикс, остальное не трогать и забыть
👍2
Купил на небольшую сумму эту монетку на споте. Вполне вероятны х3 в течение пары недель
🔥3custom 53548913855750579012
#STRK Виталик Бутерин о сети Starknet
Kraken, голландская фирма, поддерживаемая Tether, выпускает стейблкоины евро и доллара США, соответствующие требованиям MiCA
#STRK На графике старкнет коина с августа происходит длительное накопление актива, стрелочками указаны аномальные показатели объёма при которых цена практически никак не среагировала. Можно взять сейчас на долгосрок, либо подождать коррекции и откупить. Сам в этом активе закопал большую часть капитала)
👍4❤1
Советую перед очень влияющими на финансовые рынки явлениями в принципе не открывать никаких сделок) А полный список всех важных событий можете отслеживать здесь
👍2
#BTC Средняя себестоимость добычи биткоина у крупнейших фондов снизилась до 49.500$. Это означает, что происходит большое накопление и цена рано или поздно улетит ещё выше.
🤔1
Что вас большего всего интересует?
The shares total 140%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
После обновления хаёв биткоином появилось желание снова вести канал. Остался здесь кто-то живой?)
👍6
https://t.me/notcoin_bot?start=r_576800_3631723
#BTC 🔷 15% прибыли на большую часть портфеля меньше чем за неделю!!! Вход по 24950 получился ювелирным. Вот что значит ждать и вовремя зайти-это лучшая стратегия из всех 😉 Часть как писал продал по 29000 и буду откупать в районе 27200 проданное. #прибыль
👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @d3crypt1on. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Что вас большего всего интересует?
The shares total 140%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 6 May 2023 to 1 December 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“decryption” (@d3crypt1on), 103 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/d3crypt1on.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.