特价处理几个云机服务号,只能扫码进粉,正常功能服务号大量有货需要滴滴 @S555 💎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎
🤡1

Channel
@d333d
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
19,637subscribers
-3,553 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002086873557 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @d333d @skygzs1 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 24 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/d333d |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 19:18 | 19,637 | -161 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 17:46 | 19,798 | -18 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 11:24 | 19,816 | -90 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 15:53 | 19,906 | no change |
| 20 Aug 2026, 11:58 | 19,906 | -130 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 13:56 | 20,036 | no change |
| 19 Aug 2026, 10:57 | 20,036 | -202 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 13:38 | 20,238 | no change |
| 18 Aug 2026, 09:12 | 20,238 | -147 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 15:39 | 20,385 | -45 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:03 | 20,430 | -253 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:48 | 20,683 | -361 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 16:06 | 21,044 | -83 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 20:34 | 21,127 | -74 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 07:09 | 21,201 | -98 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 13:27 | 21,299 | -125 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 08:45 | 21,424 | -75 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 21:58 | 21,499 | -274 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 20:02 | 21,773 | -508 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:57 | 22,281 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 1 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 34 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (1 April 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 5,933 |
| Reactions total | 2 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Aug 2026, 21:43 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
7 reactions across 5 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 85.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 6 | 85.7% | |
| 🤡 | 1 | 14.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 1 April 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
特价处理几个云机服务号,只能扫码进粉,正常功能服务号大量有货需要滴滴 @S555 💎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎
🤡1
大量满年公众号到货,需要咨询客服 @S555💎😎😎
❤1
大量服务号到货,可日租,可买断 认准客服 @S555😎😎😎😎😎😎😎
❤2
📣🥳独家系统 开发系统 开管理 1️⃣实时在线 ip 手机型号🎈 2️⃣可拉黑 删除 备注🎈 3️⃣实时账号状态🎈 4️⃣快捷回复 欢迎语🎈 5️⃣微信同样页面 方便老年人使用 6️⃣可以发送安装包 用户下载直接跳安装🎈 7️⃣离线自动推送 无限手动推送 8️⃣系统流畅 不存在卡粉🎈 9️⃣独家代码稳定性续租率拉满 1️⃣0️⃣小程序死了 换码 老粉继续聊老粉支持推送 1️⃣1️⃣强制订阅 强制订阅 欢迎各大盘口中介来谈 强制订阅 强制推送 认准客服 @S555🤠
❤2
Posted without readable text
💎😎😎主推云机手表微信,定制名字头像,接粉稳定。 可主动加人,不跳验证,被动只能二维码接粉。 😃😀😃😀😃@s555
❤1
💎😎😎五年公众号,欢迎咨询,数量不多先到先得 😎😎😎😎大量有服务号日租,公众号日租,买断 📱 @S555 😀😀
@lxq345 @zgkm998 中介跑路名单,有合作的请谨慎,此后不熟的一律先款。
⚠️ 紧急提醒:请立刻停止使用比特派钱包! ⚠️ 比特派是唯一有司法协助入口的钱包! 最近链上安全问题频发,很多使用“比特派”钱包用户资产莫名被转走,等发现的时候,钱包已经被清空。为了避免不必要的风险,请大家尽量更换为更稳定、更常用的钱包,并妥善保管自己的助记词和私钥。 同时如果客户的地址出现问题,比特派愿意配合与执法部门合作,并提供技术支持把客户的IP提交给执法部门! 我们要坚决抵制比特派“黑社会行为” 我推荐以下钱包登入苹果国外ID搜索下载 “Tokenpocket” “TronLink” “imtoken” 安卓建议在谷歌商店下载!
😄出成品微信云机号,🉑加好友🉑聊天,手机电脑都支持使用。 微信加人不出人脸,不出安全验证 有货了之前要的老板滴滴 😀😃😀😄😃😀 @S555 🤝
😎😎😎服务号日租稳定接粉 目前适合电销搜名字接粉,搜微信号接粉,扫码接粉😎😎😎😎
苹果IOS的推送出问题了 刚解决 这几天没信息弹窗和推送总觉得怪怪的,搜了一下才发现挺多人都收不到信息 天空教你 去小火箭设置了一下马上就收到了弹窗信息 1️⃣先加一个模块: #!name=苹果APNs推送 #!desc=设置完之后要开关飞行模式,断掉所有连接才会生效,如果还是不行可以尝试到设置,隧道,打开包含所有网络,apns开关 [Rule] DOMAIN-SUFFIX,push.apple.com,PROXY DOMAIN-SUFFIX,akadns.net,PROXY DOMAIN-KEYWORD,apple.com.edgekey.net,PROXY IP-CIDR,17.249.0.0/16,PROXY,no-resolve IP-CIDR,17.252.0.0/16,PROXY,no-resolve IP-CIDR,17.57.144.0/22,PROXY,no-resolve IP-CIDR,17.1…
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @d333d. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,569,647 of 1,584,142entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“天空|企业微信|TRX兑换|能量租赁” (@d333d), 19,637 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/d333d.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.