Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Czerwonya

Channel

Czerwonya

@czerwonya

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

13,631subscribers

+194 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001546059875
TypeChannel
Username@czerwonya
DescriptionЭтот сибиреязвенный скотомогильник токо для крутых🐖 Щп https://t.me/dickanballs ‼️Я не принимаю конструктивную критику, хуесосить меня можно только строго без причины. А еще без политики в чяте
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held55
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/czerwonya

Topic

Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

13,43013,67513,552.58 August 2026 — 13,437 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,439 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,434 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,432 subscribers13 August 2026 — 13,430 subscribers14 August 2026 — 13,457 subscribers16 August 2026 — 13,491 subscribers17 August 2026 — 13,526 subscribers18 August 2026 — 13,536 subscribers19 August 2026 — 13,544 subscribers20 August 2026 — 13,555 subscribers21 August 2026 — 13,560 subscribers22 August 2026 — 13,562 subscribers24 August 2026 — 13,558 subscribers25 August 2026 — 13,564 subscribers26 August 2026 — 13,565 subscribers27 August 2026 — 13,568 subscribers28 August 2026 — 13,569 subscribers29 August 2026 — 13,573 subscribers31 August 2026 — 13,566 subscribers1 September 2026 — 13,567 subscribers2 September 2026 — 13,564 subscribers3 September 2026 — 13,563 subscribers5 September 2026 — 13,590 subscribers8 September 2026 — 13,605 subscribers13 September 2026 — 13,612 subscribers14 September 2026 — 13,618 subscribers16 September 2026 — 13,634 subscribers19 September 2026 — 13,643 subscribers25 September 2026 — 13,659 subscribers4 October 2026 — 13,664 subscribers8 October 2026 — 13,675 subscribers12 October 2026 — 13,673 subscribers14 October 2026 — 13,675 subscribers15 October 2026 — 13,667 subscribers16 October 2026 — 13,663 subscribers17 October 2026 — 13,660 subscribers18 October 2026 — 13,655 subscribers19 October 2026 — 13,654 subscribers20 October 2026 — 13,649 subscribers22 October 2026 — 13,647 subscribers23 October 2026 — 13,648 subscribers24 October 2026 — 13,658 subscribers27 October 2026 — 13,654 subscribers28 October 2026 — 13,651 subscribers1 November 2026 — 13,649 subscribers2 November 2026 — 13,642 subscribers3 November 2026 — 13,640 subscribers4 November 2026 — 13,638 subscribers5 November 2026 — 13,636 subscribers6 November 2026 — 13,635 subscribers7 November 2026 — 13,637 subscribers8 November 2026 — 13,634 subscribers9 November 2026 — 13,633 subscribers11 November 2026 — 13,631 subscribers13,6318 August 202611 November 2026
55 measurements spanning 94 days, net +194. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,393–13,712 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 55
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 04:0113,631-2
9 Nov 2026, 09:3613,633-1
8 Nov 2026, 04:1713,634-3
7 Nov 2026, 03:1513,637+2
6 Nov 2026, 05:3913,635-1
5 Nov 2026, 05:4513,636-2
4 Nov 2026, 06:4613,638-2
3 Nov 2026, 09:0913,640-2
2 Nov 2026, 06:4413,642-7
1 Nov 2026, 04:5713,649-2
28 Oct 2026, 07:2013,651-3
27 Oct 2026, 07:2813,654-4
24 Oct 2026, 05:1113,658+10
23 Oct 2026, 01:4713,648+1
22 Oct 2026, 02:1813,647-2
20 Oct 2026, 17:3913,649-5
19 Oct 2026, 15:2113,654-1
18 Oct 2026, 12:5013,655-5
17 Oct 2026, 12:0613,660-3
16 Oct 2026, 09:1013,663first reading

Engagement

27 posts held, back to 31 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 63 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
64.7%
avg views ÷ 13,631 subscribers
Avg views / post
8,820
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
14.5%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 27 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 October 2026
Posts held27 (31 December 2025 – 31 October 2026)
Views total35,270
Reactions total5,129
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Nov 2026, 07:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
900
Videos
32
Links
16

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

60,598 reactions across 27 posts, in 41 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤30,33350.1%
🔥9,33815.4%
🍓5,9119.75%
❤‍🔥4,5057.43%
🕊2,0783.43%
💘1,6582.74%
🥰1,6552.73%
💋1,1931.97%
😭5300.875%
⚡5240.865%
🍌4670.771%
🙏3600.594%
🌭3200.528%
☃3070.507%
🐳2600.429%
💊2540.419%
🍾2000.33%
🎅1750.289%
🤯1320.218%
👀670.111%
21 further kinds3310.546%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 60,598 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 31 December 2025 to 31 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
137
across the posts below
Posts paid on
25
of 27 we hold a reading for · 93%
Most on one post
17
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @czerwonya. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 27 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 December 2025 to 31 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 4 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

31 Oct 2026, 19:56 UTC≈5,000 views1,643 reactions4 Starsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Коммишн для фан мерча Лежало какое-то время в файлах, мне стало сложно выкладывать куда-либо работы в целом

❤1,060❤‍🔥294💋202☃20🍓15💘14🔥14👾9

Signed тёща

23 Oct 2026, 10:45 UTC≈8,170 views743 reactions1 Starread 12 November 2026
Photo

Нарисовала 02 для Червони

❤480❤‍🔥136🍌71🔥17🍓10💋8💘6🦄6

Signed тёща

15 Oct 2026, 01:35 UTC≈11,500 views1,520 reactions3 Starsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Да будут полноценки обещяю я рисую коммишны щяс Альб*рт и 😍Надя😍

🔥950❤321🍓182❤‍🔥18💘18🥰10💋8☃6

Signed тёща

14 Oct 2026, 18:43 UTC≈10,600 views1,223 reactions1 Starread 12 November 2026
Photo

Я додумала предысторию и изменила лор в честь этого фейс reveal/редизайн Альберта бати 02 он больше не аниме мальчик а полуживой лысеющий слепнущий дед хатидже кинни два понедельника осталось господи спасибо его идеи полная хуйня

❤832🐳172🔥133💘31🍓19❤‍🔥15💋10🕊5

Signed тёща

17 Sept 2026, 17:13 UTC≈13,400 views926 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Вот это ахуеть подгон 🤯🤯 слова излишни

🍓634🙏113🔥83💘36❤31❤‍🔥11🎅6🤓5

Signed тёща

17 Sept 2026, 17:13 UTC≈12,000 views1,579 reactions6 Starsread 12 November 2026
Photo

подарок для начальника этого

❤1,050🔥225🙏175🥰32❤‍🔥27🍓22🦄17💘11

Signed тёща

10 Sept 2026, 22:45 UTC≈16,300 views2,217 reactions3 Starsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Быстрый скетч грязные вонючие пидарасы

❤1,460🍓358🥰255❤‍🔥51🔥27💘25⚡17🏆11

Signed тёща

10 Sept 2026, 07:46 UTC≈14,500 views2,445 reactions3 Starsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Изюм ✅️ будет

🔥1,570🍓415🥰213❤127❤‍🔥34💘27🍌25🌭13

Signed тёща

19 Aug 2026, 20:21 UTC≈19,300 views3,353 reactions10 Starsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Быстрая картинка

🍓2,170😭507💋384❤150🔥58🥰42🐳16🌭11

Signed тёща

14 Aug 2026, 03:52 UTC≈20,500 views3,591 reactions14 Starsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Чета умное

❤2,430❤‍🔥650💋350💘41⚡35🙏30🔥24🍌11

Signed тёща

12 Aug 2026, 10:06 UTC≈17,300 views839 reactions5 Starsread 12 November 2026

Готовая картинка уже в платке (в коммах) 🥳 Спидпаинт к ней тоже сегодня будет там

❤613🍓103⚡64❤‍🔥25😡10💘8☃7💋4

Signed червоненка

4 Aug 2026, 14:42 UTC≈21,100 views3,164 reactions10 Starsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Червоня дуреет от этой прикормки

❤2,100🥰461❤‍🔥406🍓43💘42🔥40👀36⚡14

Signed червоненка

Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @czerwonya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

сильверхезер
@silverheatherr · 19,325
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 5 October 2026
АПОЛЛИ
@apollisolis · 23,126
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 19 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Czerwonya” (@czerwonya), 13,631 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/czerwonya.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.