It is good to pump silently all of a sudden rather than issuing signals or notifications that we are about to pump, so that paper hands will realize.
π―5π₯3β€2π±1

Channel
@czdaddynews
On this record: Topic Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry
18subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002409405937 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @czdaddynews |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 28 February 2025 β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 7 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/czdaddynews |
Crypto & trading β a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelβs own recent posts on 1 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 71% confidence. This is a modelβs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Sept 2026, 21:40 | 18 | -1 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 02:40 | 19 | +1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 18:46 | 18 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:07 | 18 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 28 February 2025 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β not this channelβs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramβs own rounded chrome, so it carries no β mark.
216 reactions across 18 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| π₯ | 81 | 37.5% | |
| β€ | 55 | 25.5% | |
| π | 20 | 9.26% | |
| π | 17 | 7.87% | |
| π― | 10 | 4.63% | |
| π | 7 | 3.24% | |
| π | 5 | 2.31% | |
| π± | 5 | 2.31% | |
| π€ | 5 | 2.31% | |
| π | 3 | 1.39% | |
| πΎ | 2 | 0.926% | |
| π | 2 | 0.926% | |
| π | 2 | 0.926% | |
| π | 1 | 0.463% | |
| π₯° | 1 | 0.463% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 216 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 February 2025 to 5 March 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
It is good to pump silently all of a sudden rather than issuing signals or notifications that we are about to pump, so that paper hands will realize.
π―5π₯3β€2π±1
Market is horrible at the moment. Back to the work guys.
π5π₯2π1
Be patient. Father BTC is bleeding and everyone is bleeding too. Better buy your bags and put your smart phone away and relax π
π5β€3π₯3
I love to test patience. Thatβs how we get diamond hands holder. See you on Wednesday at 18:10 UTC
π5β€3π₯3π2π€1π1
The chains are extremely congested right now due to high volume and Crypto Reserve announcement.
π₯9β€2π1
Sticker, posted without a caption
π₯7π4β€2π―1
Bull run officially started. π
π₯11β€5π4π1
Not bad.
β€4π₯2π1π1
Anndy just interacted with us β€οΈ
π₯7π±4π3β€1
Whatever is happening is happening for a reason. As i said before if you canβt hold you wonβt be rich.
β€6π2π€2π₯1
100k MC I do a tweet for the project ππ
β€3π₯2π€2
I think community doesnβt want pump thatβs why not pushing mc to 18k $ before 18:10 UTC Lets push it to 18k $ mc before 18:10 UTC
β€6π3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @czdaddynews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βCzdaddy news channel π’β (@czdaddynews), 18 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/czdaddynews.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.