Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Czaruz

Channel

Czaruz

@czaruztattoo

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

811subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001759252151
TypeChannel
Username@czaruztattoo
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/czaruztattoo

Growth

810811810.57 August 2026 — 810 subscribers8 August 2026 — 810 subscribers15 August 2026 — 811 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 810–811 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 03:23811+1
8 Aug 2026, 01:33810no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:49810first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.3%
avg views ÷ 811 subscribers
Avg views / post
124
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
10.8%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held11 (31 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total1,365
Reactions total148
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 01:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
10s
Average length
10s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

148 reactions across 11 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54632580576077607273523.6%
custom 52355891641660323243020.3%
custom 54273420936746301483020.3%
custom 52897227558711629002114.2%
custom 5438334748936136839117.43%
😁117.43%
custom 5377605015177290381106.76%

Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 148reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 19:49 UTC43 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Продолжаем потихоньку забивать руку Свага, кстати, занимается музыкой, вот его творчество 👇 https://music.yandex.ru/artist/20624159?ref_id=7B7916D7-FB81-4316-8A76-5A6E81C83A1E&utm_medium=copy_link

custom 54273420936746301485custom 53776050151772903814custom 54632580576077607273custom 54383347489361368391

7 Aug 2026, 18:05 UTC68 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Я так подумал: если мои клиенты занимаются творчеством или ведут блоги и т.д почему бы не поддерживать друг друга? — И я буду упоминать абсолютно бесплатно в постах под их татуировками 🤝 Чисто по братски) Кому интересно, вы всегда сможете подписаться на ребят и поддержать друг друга

custom 52355891641660323248custom 52897227558711629005custom 54632580576077607275

6 Aug 2026, 13:42 UTC102 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Зацените, какие татухи я брату рисовал, когда были пиздюками — Уже тогда во мне просыпался тату-мастер 🤣😅

😁9custom 54383347489361368394custom 52897227558711629003custom 54273420936746301481

6 Aug 2026, 10:43 UTC109 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Сделал татуировку брату😎 Он недавно только с армии пришёл 💪

custom 542734209367463014813custom 54383347489361368395custom 52897227558711629003

6 Aug 2026, 07:49 UTC100 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ещё одного тигра забронировали ✅ Остался один свободный

custom 54632580576077607273custom 52897227558711629002

5 Aug 2026, 17:42 UTC122 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Виктория пришла просто с сестрой посмотреть, как ей делают тату Ну и заодно и ей сделали 😎

custom 52355891641660323246custom 54632580576077607273custom 53776050151772903811

5 Aug 2026, 13:10 UTC125 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Свободные эскизы😎 (Москва или Саратов) По всем вопросам и брони в ЛС @czaruz

custom 54632580576077607273custom 54273420936746301481

4 Aug 2026, 06:34 UTC144 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Арина давно хотела нежную и аккуратную татуировку. — Ещё несколько лет назад подписалась на меня во ВКонтакте, а когда я приехал в Саратов — всё совпало. Так мы и реализовали нежную, изящную и минималистичную бабочку 🦋

custom 52355891641660323247custom 54632580576077607276custom 53776050151772903814

2 Aug 2026, 14:21 UTC174 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Делюсь фотографиями заживших татуировок от моих клиентов Соц сети ребят👇 Анастасии — https://www.instagram.com/nastiibar?igsh=MWp2c3dpMzF2N284OQ== Даниила — https://t.me/mvlgin И Карины — https://t.me/rin_spacee ✨ Если у вас тоже есть красивые фотографии, где видно вашу татуировку (или даже её небольшую часть), присылайте их мне в личные сообщения или оставляйте в комментариях 🤝 С удовольствием соберу ещё неско

custom 52355891641660323247custom 52897227558711629004custom 54273420936746301484custom 54632580576077607272😁1custom 53776050151772903811

1 Aug 2026, 18:04 UTC185 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Буду потихоньку выкладывать работы с Саратова 💪 Первая татуировка для Татьяны 👁👁👁👁👁👁

custom 54632580576077607277custom 52355891641660323242😁1custom 54273420936746301481custom 54383347489361368391

31 Jul 2026, 16:58 UTC193 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Продолжаем забивать Николаю ногу в Японии 👺😄

custom 54273420936746301485custom 52897227558711629004custom 54632580576077607273

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @czaruztattoo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,290,276 of 1,549,704entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Czaruz” (@czaruztattoo), 811 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/czaruztattoo.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.