Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 阿咪客評專區🦋🦋🦋

Channel

阿咪客評專區🦋🦋🦋

@cz918

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

89subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001697711344
TypeChannel
Username@cz918
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 9 January 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 October 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged3 times, most recently 11 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/cz918

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 27 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

8991907 August 2026 — 91 subscribers9 August 2026 — 91 subscribers16 August 2026 — 90 subscribers16 September 2026 — 89 subscribers7 August 202616 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 40 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 89–91 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 07:3989-1
16 Aug 2026, 15:5290-1
9 Aug 2026, 14:0191no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:2891first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 9 January 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 November 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
21s
Average length
21s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2 reactions across 1 post, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍150.0%
👎150.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 9 January 2023 to 25 November 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Jul 2023, 09:04 UTC661 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

【交給你安排就好】 葛格放心的交給小咪安排 那小咪就會讓葛格約的放心約的開心 這次的這位葛格是喜歡小隻的妹妹 預算8k 小咪給葛格安排了一位158/48/C/25歲的妹妹 約完之後葛格覺得很滿意 不過缺點是妹妹很少出來 估計會很難回約到 ⊱⊱⊱...............Ψ...............⊰⊰⊰ 🍨阿咪賴:i6hge 🍧密小咪TG:@papa8989 ⊱⊱⊱...............Ψ...............⊰⊰⊰ 📍看照選妃請點擊👉🏻 @xueli99071 📍新手喝茶:@xt918 📍旅館推薦:@gg918 📍客評專區:@cz918 📍淫領全台:@hhjy3w 📍迷迷糊糊的日常:@bm918 💋給我一個機會 我將給您全世界 用我最豐富的經驗 換您一晚的驚艷 不怕沒有你想要的 只怕全部都是想要的

27 Mar 2023, 13:05 UTC588 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

妹妹出來約會還準備了黑絲和情趣服裝耶(雖然情趣服裝走太急忘記了 哈哈)超可的 這麼好的妹妹真的不能錯過啊

2 Feb 2023, 06:32 UTC627 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

#雙北 客評 162-45-C+-25歲 家教老師 長相清秀 服務主動熱情~ 主要鮑魚很緊哦~ 有想要來衝一把的嗎 快來找小咪約她 機不可失 失不再來 短期兼職 不定時上岸 收費:6000 ⊱⊱⊱...............Ψ...............⊰⊰⊰ 🍨阿咪賴:h8ab 🍧密小咪TG:@papa8989 ⊱⊱⊱...............Ψ...............⊰⊰⊰ 📍看照選妃請點擊👉🏻 @xueli99071 📍新手喝茶:@xt918 📍旅館推薦:@gg918 📍客評專區:@cz918 📍淫領全台:@hhjy3w 📍迷迷糊糊的日常:@bm918 💋給我一個機會 我將給您全世界 用我最豐富的經驗 換您一晚的驚艷 不怕沒有你想要的 只怕全部都是想要的

👍1👎1

1 Feb 2023, 09:22 UTC456 viewsread 9 August 2026
Video

春風吹二月 吹來了幸運和美麗 吹散了悲傷和難過

29 Jan 2023, 13:51 UTC438 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

你今年的願望是什麽呢? What is your wish this year? ❤️❤️

9 Jan 2023, 08:22 UTC452 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

本來只是想買一節的,妹妹到了看見很滿意直接三加一🤪

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @cz918. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“阿咪客評專區🦋🦋🦋” (@cz918), 89 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cz918.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.