Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ЦИРКОВЫЕ

Channel

ЦИРКОВЫЕ

@cyrkovye

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,596subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 31 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001325366252
TypeChannel
Username@cyrkovye
Created4 May 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded31 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/cyrkovye

Topic

Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 50% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3,5933,5973,59531 August 2026 — 3,595 subscribers1 September 2026 — 3,595 subscribers4 September 2026 — 3,597 subscribers9 September 2026 — 3,593 subscribers14 September 2026 — 3,597 subscribers18 September 2026 — 3,596 subscribers3,59631 August 202618 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 18 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,592–3,598 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 20:563,596-1
14 Sept 2026, 02:003,597+4
9 Sept 2026, 23:353,593-4
4 Sept 2026, 08:373,597+2
1 Sept 2026, 05:153,595no change
31 Aug 2026, 22:153,595first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 21 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
29.5%
avg views ÷ 3,596 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,060
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.16%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 August 2026
Posts held14 (21 June 202625 August 2026)
Views total5,313
Reactions total115
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken31 Aug 2026, 22:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5m 50s
Average length
1m 57s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

396 reactions across 14 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7719.4%
😡6817.2%
👍6616.7%
💯4912.4%
🎉4210.6%
😁276.82%
😱225.56%
🤝143.54%
🤔92.27%
🔥82.02%
👏61.52%
😢51.26%
👎30.758%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 396 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 21 June 2026 to 25 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 14 we hold a reading for · 14%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @cyrkovye. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 June 2026 to 25 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

25 Aug 2026, 23:00 UTC≈1,010 views16 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Video

Начальник управления обеспечения деятельности филиалов Росгосцирка Алёна Ненашева наконец-то нашла время чтобы прокомментировать ситуацию. К тому времени видео обращение билетеров набрало уже почти 2 млн просмотров. Одним дублем записать видео без монтажа и ответить на все вопросы у Ненашевой не получилось. Послушайте внимательно что она говорит и оцените глубину её мыслей и глубину её знаний в области цирковой сп

💯16

25 Aug 2026, 06:08 UTC≈1,030 views18 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Photo

Елена Вотинцева, а просто быть человеком и уважительно относиться к людям не пробовали? Должность директора и такая реклама от Росгосцирка вскружили вам голову? Пригласите билетёров, поговорите с ними, принесите им свои извинения, урегулируйте ситуацию и конфликт будет исчерпан. У нового неопытного директора есть право на ошибку. Цирковые билетёры это и есть часть тех цирковых традиций, которые, судя по заявлению Р

😁18

25 Aug 2026, 05:58 UTC983 views19 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Video

Видео абсолютно не постановочное и снято в обычный рабочий день. Посмотрите на этих красивых и ухоженных девушек и с каким прекрасным настроением билетеры Волгоградского государственного цирка ожидают встречи со зрителями. При чём за совсем небольшую заработную плату, всего около 1400 рублей за одно представление. Любой нормальный директор цирка просто мечтал бы чтобы в его цирке работали такие билетеры. Безобид

14👏5

24 Aug 2026, 21:31 UTC≈1,050 views25 reactionsread 31 August 2026

«Грозила уволить за поход в туалет»: контролеры волгоградского цирка заявили о конфликте с новым директором https://v102.ru/news/162738.html

😡25

24 Aug 2026, 21:24 UTC≈1,240 views37 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Photo

Видеообращение билетёров-контролеров Волгоградского государственного цирка за чуть более суток сумарно набрало 1,7 млн просмотров и это без учёта репостов. А что на это Росгосцирк? И его генеральный директор С.Г. Беляков? Публичной реакции нет никакой. Не считают нужным публично реагировать на каких-то там самозанятых билетеров. Директору цирка дано указание не продлить с ними договоры ГПХ после окончания гастролей

😡325

3 Aug 2026, 10:51 UTC≈1,810 views59 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Forwarded from @forgang_circusPhoto

Сегодня, 3 августа, свой День Рождения празднует заслуженный артист РФ Дан Запашный! ПОЗДРАВЛЯЕМ!!! 🎪 Подписаться | Прислать новость

🎉42👍115👏1

2 Aug 2026, 16:52 UTC≈1,920 views21 reactions1 Starread 31 August 2026

Юристы - профессионалы из МПЦ (Межрегиональный правовой центр) под руководством Игоря Владимировича Матвеева защищают права женщины с ребёнком, которую сотрудники росгвардии в антракте силой выволокли из Большого Московского государственного цирка на пр. Вернадского за то что она, якобы при входе в цирк, пройдя через «рамку» отказалась охраннику ЧОП (мужского пола) показать содержимое своей маленькой дамской сумочки

👍154👎2

27 Jul 2026, 07:56 UTC≈1,940 views21 reactionsread 31 August 2026

P.S. А теперь — о тех, кого забыли… Мы с вами, уважаемые читатели, только что проделали долгий путь по лабиринтам коррупционных схем, договоров и судебных постановлений. Разбирали полномочия, статьи Уголовного кодекса, должностные инструкции и протоколы допросов. А теперь давайте на минуту остановимся и посмотрим, что осталось за кадром этого расследования. Семья Баландиных. Алексей Владимирович Баландин — простой от

🤝106💯5

23 Jul 2026, 17:49 UTC≈2,280 views35 reactionsread 31 August 2026

Росгвардейцы силой выволокли из БМГЦ мать и ребёнка нанеся им травмы Бравые парни-росгвардейцы в бронежилетах и с автоматами отважно выволокли мать с ребенком из фойе Большого московского цирка, нанеся и матери и ребенку телесные повреждения, насильно усадили их в патрульный автомобиль и доставили в ОМВД России по Гагаринскому району г. Москвы 05.07.2026 г. В 13:30 Олеся со своим несовершеннолетним сыном пришли на

😱17😡116🔥1

23 Jul 2026, 07:22 UTC≈1,740 views10 reactionsread 31 August 2026

Клоунада с доверенностью: Или как Бушкова законы пишет! https://dzen.ru/a/ajrno4fB1Guszka_

😁91

20 Jul 2026, 18:30 UTC≈2,050 views36 reactionsread 31 August 2026

P.S. «Дорогие, Беляков и Бушкова»! Вы думаете, что мы не видим? Мы видим всё. Мы видим, как вы топите людей, которые вам не нужны, только потому что вы не можете их контролировать. Вы думаете, что если вы подпишете ещё пару приказов, то все поверят в вашу "эффективность"? Нет. Все уже поняли, что вы — не менеджеры, а «клоуны». Только без грима. Без смеха. Без таланта. Вы — декорация. Вы — фанерные щиты на фоне разруш

💯26👍54😢1

28 Jun 2026, 05:05 UTC≈3,030 views19 reactionsread 31 August 2026

#нампишут #омскийцирк Опубликуйте пожалуйста. «За последний месяц написали заявление на увольнение главный инженер и бывший главный администратор. Ушёл окончательно замдиректора Егор Иванович, который проработал в цирке почти 50 лет, уходят униформисты, технический персонал... Остались в цирке главбух, кассир, завхоз и кадры. Ну и директор с главным ( над кем главным??) администратором. ВКонтакте пестрят объявления

🤔8😱5😢42

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @cyrkovye. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ZАПАШНЫЙ
@zapashnyru · 37,539
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 31 August 2026
Москва online
@mos_online · 26,709
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 11 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ЦИРКОВЫЕ” (@cyrkovye), 3,596 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cyrkovye.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.