Channel
@cyborgCalls
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
11subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002823965109 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cyborgCalls |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 22 August 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cyborgCalls |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:16 | 11 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:30 | 11 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 22 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
988 reactions across 17 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 184 | 18.6% | |
| ❤ | 176 | 17.8% | |
| 👍 | 156 | 15.8% | |
| 👌 | 70 | 7.09% | |
| 🐳 | 68 | 6.88% | |
| 💯 | 55 | 5.57% | |
| 🍓 | 47 | 4.76% | |
| 🌭 | 40 | 4.05% | |
| 🏆 | 40 | 4.05% | |
| 🤡 | 37 | 3.74% | |
| 🕊 | 34 | 3.44% | |
| 🍾 | 31 | 3.14% | |
| 💋 | 26 | 2.63% | |
| ⚡ | 24 | 2.43% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 988reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 22 August 2025 to 19 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
There’s so much more to AI than we know if I’m going to be honest This isn’t new information to me, but looking at it from this angle, i know now that i only knew surface level All thanks to Bitunix and their really self-explanatory yet detailed articles. They always deliver quality knowledge imo
🔥20👍16❤14
Bitunix is working hand-in-hand with AlchemyPay to ensure smooth and swifter deposits for trades In fact, this collab comes with a 10 USDT trading bonus for every 100 USDT (or above) deposits You never know when you need that extra 10 USDT leverage. Deposit now with AlchemyPay and get your reward!
🔥22👍21❤16
Uncertain of the market stance and want a little insight on what the fastest growing Xchange thinks about it from their survey and findings?? Search no further - Bitunix has put out an article to let yk if it’s safe to trade at a time like ts or not short.bitunixads.com/cGxxve
❤17🔥17👍13
Worried about conversion fees when working with exchanges? Bitunix’s got you covered With @bitunixglobal , you can convert with ZERO fees, no slippage and more token pairs for better experience Start swapping: bitunix.com/flash-exchange Discord: discord.gg/bitunix
❤18👍15🔥13
$SOL plays are making a run for the top - my eyes peeled for the best. Landed on a solid utility play - an AI agent that’ll help with market prediction, helping you see trends clearly Currently at $1.5M, next pb at $2.5M imo. Ticker is $PLAYAGENT btw. Scoop it up anon CA: FgHpSsku7asGyTThooDmkKwmzy24ucUeyBrW9kLqpump
❤23👍22🔥22
Seeing $BTC dominance to be 56+% isn’t coming to me as shock, the gem was always destined to dominate $TRUMP, $PEPE, and $PUMP are runners by default. I’ve seen some really top folks call them and milk from them They’re actively trading on Bitunix, log on and anticipate more greens, anon https://www.bitunix.com/register?inviteCode=ddknv7
❤23👍16🔥14
Who’s active??? 👀
👍30🔥25❤18
Even when it seems like you reprimand yourself countless times whenever you get emotional while trading, you still find yourself trading under emotional subjection? Most times you find yourself in losses I’ve got you - Bitunix put out an article for you. Here’s the link, give it a look Bitunix fam https://short.bitunixads.com/Y7hCJI
🔥26❤22👍14
It’s the weekend and these are all the gems listed on Bitunix this week & trust me they’re all gainers; Aug 23 thru Aug 29, 2025 • $WLFI • $XPL • $SKY • $SPON • $XPR • $ACS • $CAMP • $BTR • $DOLO • $MITO Only expect more gainers this coming week. Lock in, gang. Load up your bags and get ready for solid alts and memes to be listed!
🔥25❤20👍8
Fun fact from Bitunix - Tether Gold (ticker, $XAUT) is a RWA gem that reps actual ownership of physical gold 1 $XAUT=1 Troy ounce of gold stored in secure vaults jsyk Wanna know more about RWA? Check here: short.bitunixads.com/SU5MIz Bitunix XAUT contract: short.bitunixads.com/ghEG1l
👌39🐳24❤2👍1
Deposit and Trade to Win 35,000 $SPON on @bitunixglobal - big opportunity imo @SpheronFDN on X has decided to join the Bitunix Token Splash and a lot comes with this; Trade and Earn Coins to get a Share from a Prize Pool of 35,000 $SPON Hop on it, champs: bitunix.com/token-splash/d…
🐳12🌭11🍓11💯8🏆6🕊6🍾5👌4
You can’t catch @bitunixglobal losing. Team pulled up to the @Criptolatinfest, and got awarded Yes, you guessed right. They got awarded for The breakthrough exchange of the year - i quote “The fastest growing Xchange is now the breakthrough xchange of the year” Keep winning, team 🏆
🍓12🤡11💯8🕊8⚡7🏆7👌7💋7
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @cyborgCalls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,307,660 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Cyborg’s HangPit” (@cyborgCalls), 11 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cyborgCalls.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.