Channel
@cybershieldhelp1
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
130subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003712131836 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cybershieldhelp1 |
| Description | fighting against online abuse. | https://cybershield.help |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 18 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cybershieldhelp1 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 01:16 | 130 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:33 | 130 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 18 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (18 March 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 208 |
| Reactions total | 13 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 01:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
80 reactions across 13 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 46 | 57.5% | |
| 👍 | 18 | 22.5% | |
| 👏 | 16 | 20.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 80reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 March 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Hello people, We’ve recently partnered up with horus.ax. a platform designed for those who need a tool for digging into a Telegram account. We’re hoping to use their tool for our investigations within cybershield. Horus.ax provides: * One search gives you everything: • Millions of indexed messages dating back to 2020 • Complete message history • Deleted messages preserved and flagged • Use…
👍7
Hello friends, Kade here, Just wanted to clarify that earlier this morning we were dealing with a very odd situation. From the looks of it all, it seems to be cleared up "beef" wise, We made adjustments to our team as well so future incidents hopefully dont take place again. I hope you all have a wonder day/night. ❤️
Dear Arkham & $0$, Just a heads up, we’re not looking to get involved in what seems like a bit of a “beef” with one of our ex staff members. We’d really appreciate it if you could refrain from mentioning cybershield in your channel as if we’re somehow connected to this ‘beef’. This is why the anti-extortion community is genuinely fucked. It’s insane to see people trying to bring others down that are on the same t…
👏6
Hello everyone, I know it might seem like we’re not doing much because this channel is quiet, but that’s because most of the action is happening behind the scenes and we haven’t been getting many reports recently. We’re trying to get the word out and we’d love to hear your thoughts. Do you have any feedback, suggestions or ideas for cybershield.help? What can we do to make our non profit even better or what should w…
Hello friends, Kade here with some unfortunate news. Our recent partnership with scare.sh's newest division "Scareps1" has unfortunately disbanded. HOWEVER, we have something pretty cool in the works once talks and discussions finish. Much love |- [email protected] |- Management & Legal
👍5
Hello everyone, Just like we discussed earlier, we’re excited to announce that many partnerships are coming our way! We’re happy to announce that we accomplished a partnership with fatal.sh, which will help us grow our network and support each other in combating online abuse. We’re hoping to connect with more victims and achieve our shared goals together. Fatal.sh is a group focused on anti-extortion, working on i…
❤3
We can confirm that "slitted764" (Elijah Palmer) has been arrested and sentenced following a law enforcement investigation. A year ago, I documented and reported his activities, which led to him coming under investigation. Following that investigation, he has now been arrested and sentenced. Our team cooperated with law enforcement throughout the process and appreciates the efforts of everyone involved. BBC News: …
👏2
We have recently received numerous reports involving pedophilia and sextortion. Many victims feel threatened or afraid, which often prevents them from seeking help. If you are experiencing this situation, contact your local police and inform a parent, guardian, or trusted adult immediately. A moment of embarrassment is far better than continuing to be manipulated, harassed, or exploited online. If you feel unsafe, …
❤6👏2
Hello friends, as a brief and silly update, management had a team call with Osint Industries only to be told to "kick rocks" on the video meeting today. That is all. Kade (Management) @ cybershield.help
Hello everyone! we want to let you know that the CyberShield staff is active. All cases are being handled correctly. We are investigating and then it will be reported to the authorities. We also want to let you all know that we'll be making some changes to our channels. First, there will be a channel called Cybershield.help, dedicated to everything related to sponsors, partners, website updates, etc. And this channe…
❤7
Hi guys, I’ve decided to give the site a fresh coat of paint with a new colour scheme. It took me a good few hours to get it all done, but now it looks great and much more user friendly, instead of those depressing black/white color scheme we had. Plus, the report format has been updated to include more details, so we’ll have all the information we need to start off our investigations. Id say check out the site to…
👏6❤1
Hello people, I’ve just released another update on the site. It includes some changes on the ui (which I might change a bit later) and some technical fixes. We’ve also had contact with a professional advertiser who will help us get noticed and how we can actually advertise our non profit organization and start gaining recognition. I’ve also set up a mailbox for general questions or partnerships at support@cybersh…
👍6
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cybershieldhelp1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 345,792 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@cybershieldhelp1 named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CyberShield awareness” (@cybershieldhelp1), 130 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cybershieldhelp1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.