Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for CyberSec Playground | Learn ethical hacking ⚡️

Channel

CyberSec Playground | Learn ethical hacking ⚡️

@cybersecplayground

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

907subscribers

+121 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002321353025
TypeChannel
Username@cybersecplayground
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 October 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/cybersecplayground

Topic

Hacking & security — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

786907846.57 August 2026 — 786 subscribers8 August 2026 — 786 subscribers8 August 2026 — 788 subscribers15 August 2026 — 800 subscribers22 August 2026 — 809 subscribers30 August 2026 — 822 subscribers8 September 2026 — 827 subscribers17 September 2026 — 837 subscribers2 October 2026 — 863 subscribers12 October 2026 — 877 subscribers20 October 2026 — 892 subscribers27 October 2026 — 907 subscribers7 August 202627 October 2026
12 measurements spanning 81 days, net +121. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 768–925 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Oct 2026, 09:49907+15
20 Oct 2026, 00:08892+15
12 Oct 2026, 15:16877+14
2 Oct 2026, 22:00863+26
17 Sept 2026, 09:59837+10
8 Sept 2026, 23:17827+5
30 Aug 2026, 21:04822+13
22 Aug 2026, 20:47809+9
15 Aug 2026, 18:27800+12
8 Aug 2026, 13:11788+2
8 Aug 2026, 01:46786no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:24786first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 29 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

156 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥9460.3%
❤4126.3%
👍74.49%
⚡42.56%
👌42.56%
❤‍🔥21.28%
🍓21.28%
👏21.28%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 156 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 November 2025 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Aug 2026, 17:20 UTC142 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🔥 Introducing PoC Vault - Coming Soon! We're excited to announce the upcoming launch of PoC Vault, a comprehensive GitHub Proof of Concept aggregator built by CybersecPlayground. 🔍 What is PoC Vault? - Real-time discovery of PoC repositories from GitHub - Automatic CVE enrichment from NVD - Hourly updates with alerts for new PoCs ⚡️ Key Features: ✅ Auto-fetch new PoCs every hour ✅ CVE details with CVSS scores ✅ Ad…

🔥4👌1👍1

25 Jul 2026, 19:51 UTC307 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

CRLF Injection - Advanced Bypass Techniques ( P 2/3 ) Now that you understand the basics, let's explore advanced CRLF injection techniques and filter evasion methods. WAFs and input sanitization often block simple %0d%0a sequences—here's how to bypass them. 🔗 Read Full post at Medium / Github 🔔 Follow @cybersecplayground for Part 3: Real-World CRLF Exploitation & Reporting! ✅ Like & Share if you've bypassed WAF f…

🔥6❤‍🔥2

8 Jul 2026, 19:33 UTC587 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

CRLF Injection - Understanding the Vulnerability ( P 1/3 ) 🟡 CRLF injection occurs when an attacker can inject CRLF sequences (%0D%0A) into web applications, leading to HTTP response splitting, header injection, and other critical attacks. 🟡 These characters are used to terminate HTTP headers and lines. When an application includes user-controlled input in HTTP headers without proper sanitization, attackers can inj…

❤6🔥1

14 Jun 2026, 19:30 UTC847 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🎓 Part 3/3 (Final Part ) : Exploiting phpinfo() — Turning Information into Compromise 🎓 Finding a phpinfo() file is just the beginning. The real value comes from analyzing its contents and using that data to advance your attack. This final part covers post-exploitation analysis and real-world attack chains. ⚡️Read Full Write-up at: 🔗 Github / Medium 🔔 Follow @cybersecplayground for more advanced exploitation techn…

🔥6❤2

19 May 2026, 19:16 UTC890 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🖥 Day 30 – Building Your Linux Hacking Workflow (FINAL DAY) Real operators don’t just know commands — they build repeatable workflows for recon, exploitation, logging, monitoring, and reporting. Quick setup: mkdir -p ~/targets/{logs,loot,scans,exploits} alias ports='ss -tulnp' nmap -sC -sV target | tee -a scans/nmap.txt Core workflow: Recon → Enumeration → Exploitation PrivEsc → Persistence → Logging → Clea…

❤7

14 May 2026, 18:59 UTC790 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🐝 V2Hive is LIVE! Your daily source for free, organized V2Ray configs 🆕 NEW SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENT We're excited to launch V2Hive - a fully automated V2Ray config collector that fetches , dedup and organizes free configs from multiple open sources accross the INTERNET. 📊 WHAT'S INSIDE? ✅ 25,000+ Active Configs ✅ 100+ Countries ✅ 4 Protocols: VMess | VLess | Trojan | Shadowsocks ✅ Updated Every 2 Hours ✅ Deduplic…

🔥2❤1👏1

11 May 2026, 05:49 UTC828 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Hey everyone! 👋 We're excited to announce our NEW service: 🚀 @letsgetvpn Now you can access the internet securely and for FREE. ⚡️ Fast servers 🌍 Multiple locations 🔒 No logs, no tracking Come try it out → @letsgetvpn ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 📢 Our other channels are also active: ✅ @letsgetproxy → Proxy lists are UP and running! ⏳ @letsgetmtproto → MTProto configs are UP and running! Stay connected with our full n…

🔥4❤1

28 Apr 2026, 21:06 UTC662 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🎓 COMMON HTTP ERROR CODES & Bypass Techniques 🎓 HTTP error codes are not just roadblocks—they're clues. Understanding what each code means and how to bypass them is essential for web penetration testing and bug bounty hunting. This guide covers the most common error codes and practical bypass techniques. ☑️ You Can read full write-up at: 🔗 Github 🔗 Medium 🔔 Follow @cybersecplayground for more web security techniq…

🔥4❤1

9 Apr 2026, 09:28 UTC582 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🎓 Part 2/3: Finding Exposed phpinfo() Files - Reconnaissance Techniques 🎓 is Out Now that you understand what phpinfo() reveals, let's explore how to find these exposed files across the internet and on target applications. This part focuses on active discovery methodologies. 🔸 Read Full Writeup : 🔗 Github 🔗 Medium #phpinfo #Reconnaissance #BugBounty #WebSecurity #InfoDisclosure #OSINT #FFUF #DirectoryBruteforce

🔥5

17 Feb 2026, 19:16 UTC≈1,210 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🚨 STOP! Did You Just Find a phpinfo() File? 🚨 DON'T scroll past it! That boring PHP info page might be your lottery ticket to a critical bug bounty find! 🎫💰 🎓 BRAND NEW WRITE-UP SERIES: Understanding phpinfo() - The Accidental Goldmine 🎓 ⚡️READ HERE: - Medium - Github 💣 Real attackers KNOW this "The official PHP docs literally say DELETE THIS FILE... yet exposed phpinfo() pages are EVERYWHERE." 🎯 Why YOU should…

🔥11

14 Feb 2026, 19:06 UTC925 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🎓 XSS WAF Bypass: 3 Tricks to Beat Alert Blockers 🎓 Modern WAFs often block the word “alert” in XSS payloads, but JavaScript’s flexibility lets you reconstruct it dynamically. Here are three powerful obfuscation techniques that bypass keyword-based filters by breaking, encoding, or dynamically generating the alert function. ⚡️ Why These Bypass WAF Filter 🔸 No Direct “alert” String: The word is split, encoded, or co…

🔥10

25 Jan 2026, 18:45 UTC830 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🎓 Deep-Dive PII , Analyzing Impact and Reporting (Part 3/3 ) From Finding to Impact: Scoping the Exposure A single user’s email is a bug. A thousand users’ full financial records is a crisis. You must determine the scale. In This part we Covers: 1. Techniques for Scoping the Breach 2. The Business & Legal Impact 3. The User Impact (Critical for Your Report) 4. The Professional Report 🔗 Read Full Post at Github / M…

🔥5❤3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cybersecplayground. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“CyberSec Playground | Learn ethical hacking ⚡️” (@cybersecplayground), 907 subscribers as measured 27 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cybersecplayground.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.