Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for cyberpositive

Channel

cyberpositive

@cyberfeminism

On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,288subscribers

+4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001370028718
TypeChannel
Username@cyberfeminism
Created20 November 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded5 September 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/cyberfeminism

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Previous handles

Recorded in 2019 as “CYBERFEMINISM — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.

Growth

1,2841,2911,287.56 August 2026 — 1,284 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,287 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,288 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,286 subscribers18 August 2026 — 1,288 subscribers25 August 2026 — 1,289 subscribers29 August 2026 — 1,288 subscribers31 August 2026 — 1,291 subscribers4 September 2026 — 1,290 subscribers5 September 2026 — 1,290 subscribers10 September 2026 — 1,291 subscribers17 September 2026 — 1,288 subscribers1,2886 August 202617 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 42 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,283–1,292 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 15:201,288-3
10 Sept 2026, 01:591,291+1
5 Sept 2026, 09:221,290no change
4 Sept 2026, 22:171,290-1
31 Aug 2026, 19:391,291+3
29 Aug 2026, 04:241,288-1
25 Aug 2026, 22:021,289+1
18 Aug 2026, 23:141,288+2
16 Aug 2026, 06:121,286-2
12 Aug 2026, 09:531,288+1
9 Aug 2026, 00:541,287+3
6 Aug 2026, 08:401,284first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.7%
avg views ÷ 1,288 subscribers
Avg views / post
163
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
2
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 August 2026
Posts held17 (3 August 202625 August 2026)
Views total326
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Sept 2026, 09:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
12s
Average length
12s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

25 Aug 2026, 08:12 UTC163 viewsread 5 September 2026
Forwarded from @bluzhdayu

Осталось 2 места из 6! Кому? Напишите в комментариях ⬇️

25 Aug 2026, 08:12 UTC163 viewsread 5 September 2026
Forwarded from @bluzhdayuVideo

Video, posted without a caption

23 Aug 2026, 14:12 UTC341 viewsread 5 September 2026

На сайте The New Centre for Research & Practice опубликована англоязычная версия текста Лики Каревой Гостеприимный Марс из сборника Киберфеминизм +: In her book Hospitality of the Matrix: Philosophy, Biomedicine, and Culture, Irina Aristarkhova discusses how the progress of feminist thought on pregnancy has often been impeded by its struggle against the oppressive hierarchies surrounding it: “Often, in feminist rese

22 Aug 2026, 15:21 UTC186 viewsread 5 September 2026

Вот книга Иригарэ, тоже центральная для наших будущих встреч. Ницше молодец, что разьебал философию засчет тела, но не молодец, что тело так и остается абстрактной силой, поэтому феминизм о конкретных телах. Отсюда же критика Делеза и тела без органов и становления-женщиной - это все еще абстракции. И второе - мужскому культу солнца у Ницше противопоставляется морское... но это только то, на что я сделал акцент, там

22 Aug 2026, 15:21 UTC211 viewsread 5 September 2026

Борис Клюшников анонсирует цикл лекций о Ницше и его политической рецепции.

15 Aug 2026, 03:58 UTC382 viewsread 5 September 2026
Forwarded from @Philosophytoday

Донна Харауэй: «Я категорически не хочу отменять тех, с кем не согласна» Одна из важных черт вашей работы — это способность выходить за рамки бинарных оппозиций. Вы описываете свое мышление как «щупальцеобразное». Как вы начали развивать этот своеобразный способ мышления? Это сложный вопрос, потому что память очень ненадежна, и мы постоянно ее перестраиваем, но я могу рассказать историю о том, что в каком-то смысле

12 Aug 2026, 06:21 UTC364 viewsread 5 September 2026
Forwarded from @rezkonedristaniPhoto

ну вот, и это все не говоря о том, что у Рюйера есть статья, где он напрямую прыгает на Бергсона (« Bergson et le Sphex ammophile », 1959 [англ. пер.]; правда, в этом и более ранних текстах Рюйер прихватизирует термин Бергсона «виртуальное», что могло привести к ряду недоразумений). но влияние Батлера на Рюйера — почему он максимально ярый фанат — не ограничивается Erewhon и книжками о привычке, бессознательной памят

12 Aug 2026, 06:21 UTC250 viewsread 5 September 2026

Девочки: Одиссею перевела женщина. Женщины: Одиссею написала женщина.

11 Aug 2026, 21:32 UTC334 viewsread 5 September 2026
Forwarded from @etonekritikaPhoto

подъехала критика слева! эмили уилсон, авторка перевода «одиссеи», которым нолан вдохновлялся (чем вызвал возмущение у некоторой части аудитории), мощно прыгнула на его экранизацию. в целом впечатление от фильма уилсон описала так: «„Одиссея“ не скучна — благодаря первоисточнику, который невозможно испортить полностью. Это семейное аудиовизуальное зрелище, вроде пышного салюта в честь Четвёртого июля, — и примерно

11 Aug 2026, 21:32 UTC276 viewsread 5 September 2026

Эмили Уилсон об «Одиссее» Нолана

11 Aug 2026, 15:43 UTC309 viewsread 5 September 2026
Forwarded from @piligrim_fundPhoto

Повседневность создала иллюзию очевидности и доступности искусственного интеллекта – каждый имеет хотя бы общее представление о нем. Но задается ли кто-то вопросом, что здесь подразумевается под интеллектом и в каком значении он искусственный? Йожи Столет считает, что эти фундаментальные вопросы должны предварять любую критику или апологию нейросетей. На лекции «Краткая история искусственных интеллектов, или борьба

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @cyberfeminism. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“cyberpositive” (@cyberfeminism), 1,288 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cyberfeminism.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.