Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 晨~曦 TG广告代发工作室

Channel

晨~曦 TG广告代发工作室

@cx055866616

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

9,371subscribers

-1,596 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001215958024
TypeChannel
Username@cx055866616
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/cx055866616

Growth

9,37110,96710,1697 August 2026 — 10,967 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,967 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,904 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,605 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,343 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,179 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,045 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,012 subscribers14 August 2026 — 9,730 subscribers17 August 2026 — 9,371 subscribers7 August 202617 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 10 days, net -1,596. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,132–11,206 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 15:589,371-359
14 Aug 2026, 07:079,730-282
12 Aug 2026, 22:4210,012-33
12 Aug 2026, 01:1310,045-134
10 Aug 2026, 23:2710,179-164
9 Aug 2026, 20:5210,343-262
8 Aug 2026, 17:3210,605-299
7 Aug 2026, 15:1610,904-63
7 Aug 2026, 07:4510,967no change
7 Aug 2026, 07:3710,967first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 9 July 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

18 Jun 2026, 08:36 UTC≈2,070 viewsread 15 August 2026

@cx5588999 @cx5588899 骗子私聊你们不要信 认准 @tz666

1 Apr 2026, 16:03 UTC≈5,080 viewsread 15 August 2026

所有广告都正常推送了 有遗漏的私信我 明后天出差两天 有事留言 晚上统一回复

28 Mar 2026, 18:39 UTC≈5,390 viewsread 15 August 2026

所有发国外 英文的广告正常推送了 18-29 11天不计算时间 都会补天数 国内的这两天补完

18 Mar 2026, 06:37 UTC≈6,030 viewsread 15 August 2026

官方有小风控 死了一大部分发广告的账号 会陆续给补上的 补完所有广告都给延期到期时间

16 Feb 2026, 13:48 UTC≈7,770 viewsread 15 August 2026

新年快乐 梦想人生 祝各位老板大哥小弟所有为了生活奋斗的人越来越好 多挣米 多点快乐

30 Dec 2025, 16:42 UTC≈10,300 viewsread 15 August 2026

@cx5I9 @taiz666 模仿的 大骗子 老板们擦亮眼 私信找你的没聊天记录的一律不要信 付款认准此频道的地址

9 Nov 2025, 12:18 UTC≈12,300 viewsread 15 August 2026

官方风控时间 11.9下午6点 暂停一两天观望一下 没发的时间都补

26 Oct 2025, 00:55 UTC≈12,200 viewsread 15 August 2026

这两天有私事在外地 不怎么在线 望各位老板理解一下

8 Oct 2025, 13:27 UTC≈12,800 viewsread 15 August 2026

@cx5I9 @taiz666 注意这个大骗子 冒牌的 没聊天记录私聊你们的不要信

8 Oct 2025, 13:19 UTC≈12,200 viewsread 15 August 2026

@cxo333 @tiz_666 @cx5l9 @cx5I9 @cx5199 @cm56780 骗子号 没有聊天记录不要信 认准该频道唯一收款地址

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cx055866616. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 22,969 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 50 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“晨~曦 TG广告代发工作室” (@cx055866616), 9,371 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cx055866616.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.