Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Meoarty is here🪬

Channel

Meoarty is here🪬

@cwmeoartyy

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

276subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002299737881
TypeChannel
Username@cwmeoartyy
Description[18+] Welcome to the holy monastery 🪽 Буст: https://t.me/boost/cwmeoartyy
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/cwmeoartyy

Growth

27611 Aug 2026, 23:31 — 276 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 23:45 — 276 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 23:3111 Aug 2026, 23:45
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 275–277 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 23:45276no change
11 Aug 2026, 23:31276first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 20 September 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
417
Videos
62
Links
73

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 57s
Average length
39s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

423 reactions across 11 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54046892765143537737818.4%
custom 60596390443236759915513.0%
custom 52356729160283067234711.1%
custom 5411327260139476006399.22%
custom 5409287146378907882378.75%
💘378.75%
custom 6062001705833204803337.80%
custom 5830425143771403593276.38%
custom 5193191244179719823255.91%
🕊174.02%
custom 5411345264642380383143.31%
custom 541161235147864984581.89%
custom 625154208723422814551.18%
💊10.236%

Custom emoji. 11 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 423reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 20 September 2025 to 24 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
75
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 11 we hold a reading for · 27%
Most on one post
50
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @cwmeoartyy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 11 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 September 2025 to 24 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

24 Jun 2026, 13:54 UTC134 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @murmurmm00mmVideo

do you see me? — the happy fits

🕊3

20 Jun 2026, 19:39 UTC198 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @kichisweethardPhoto

урааа!! у меня и тилла день рождения!!! этот год для меня был очень сложным, настолько что я перестала постить сюда так часто, и мне искренне грустно что работ за год так мало,проблем было настолько много что я ахуела и не выуехала до сих пор. я не довольна собой, но буду стараться исправлять это спасибо всем вам что остались здесь несмотря на то что контента тут почти нет, обнимаю каждого муа муа 🫂 и спасибо всем м

🕊2

17 Mar 2026, 13:32 UTC540 views19 reactionsread 11 August 2026

💙Оставляю ссылочки на 💙свои другие платформы на случай если тг окончательно замедлят, но по большей части я все еще наиболее активна тут 💙💙 twi 💙💙 VK💙 💙💙 bluesky 💙💙 tiktok Коментарии я так же вам вернула, ибо прошлый чат опять снесло

custom 605963904432367599110custom 54046892765143537735🕊4

14 Mar 2026, 15:06 UTC850 views71 reactions5 Starsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🌊🌊 Lucifer 🌊🌊#cwmeoarty

custom 523567291602830672330custom 605963904432367599120custom 540468927651435377319🕊2

8 Mar 2026, 20:57 UTC≈1,390 views87 reactions20 Starsread 11 August 2026
Photo

#cwmeoarty 🙈

custom 540468927651435377341custom 605963904432367599123custom 523567291602830672317🕊6

3 Nov 2025, 18:15 UTC914 views74 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Всех с днём косплеера!🦋 Стабильно каждый год выпадаю немного именно в этот период и забываю про этот день, но всё таки я вспомнила и хочу поздравить всех коллег и друзей 🥰

💘24custom 541132726013947600624custom 540928714637890788218custom 62515420872342281455custom 60596390443236759912💊1

31 Oct 2025, 20:27 UTC690 views7 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Пора точно делать фулл на Майка

custom 54116123514786498454custom 54092871463789078823

31 Oct 2025, 19:29 UTC786 views49 reactions50 Starsread 11 August 2026
Photo

MICHAEL SHELLEY 🧠 🌧️ The Magnus Archive- ꩜˖ I am not a Who, Archivist, I am a What ✨🪩🪩 #cwmeoarty

custom 540928714637890788216custom 541132726013947600615custom 541134526464238038314custom 54116123514786498454

31 Oct 2025, 17:15 UTC502 views31 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video

HAPPY HALLOWEEN 🌀 Кто угадает персонажа того поцелую

custom 606200170583320480311custom 583042514377140359310custom 51931912441797198237custom 54046892765143537733

30 Sept 2025, 11:00 UTC885 views55 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

#cwmeoarty ❤️

custom 519319124417971982318custom 606200170583320480317custom 583042514377140359315custom 54046892765143537735

20 Sept 2025, 21:00 UTC727 views25 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🎀Сегодня 21 сентября, а значит день рождения у самого дорогого мне человека в мире, по этому я хочу сказать что я очень сильно люблю Машеньку, я очень благодарна ей что она всегда рядом и поддерживает меня во время всех моих трудностей и радостей 🤩🤩 Манечка, с днем рождения тебя, продолжай сиять, солнце 🎀

💘13custom 54046892765143537735custom 60620017058332048035custom 58304251437714035932

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @cwmeoartyy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,082,482 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Meoarty is here🪬” (@cwmeoartyy), 276 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cwmeoartyy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.