Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 64% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (2 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 1 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 15 comparable posts for this entry, running 28 December 2023 to 31 August 2024. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @cwdglobal. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,156–2,160 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Aug 2026, 01:00
2,158
no change
7 Aug 2026, 00:59
2,158
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 28 December 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
604
Videos
49
Links
432
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
38m 41s
Average length
19m 21s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
546 reactions across 18 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
144
26.4%
🤣
110
20.1%
💩
61
11.2%
❤
58
10.6%
👎
41
7.51%
🔥
36
6.59%
🤮
31
5.68%
🤡
14
2.56%
custom 5391017850150329873
13
2.38%
😁
9
1.65%
😢
7
1.28%
🥱
7
1.28%
👏
3
0.549%
🍾
2
0.366%
💘
2
0.366%
🖕
2
0.366%
🥰
2
0.366%
🏆
1
0.183%
👨💻
1
0.183%
🙈
1
0.183%
1 further kind
1
0.183%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 546reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 December 2023 to 2 July 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 20 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @cwdinfo. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 December 2023 to 2 July 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Уважаемые партнеры!
Комитет платформы CWD Global принял решение об очередном приведении комиссий в соответствие с курсом CWD. Комиссии были повышены на 50%. Обновление уже вступило в силу 30 августа 2024 года в 19:40 по Московскому времени.
Напомним, что решения, которые могут повлиять на экосистему CWD Global, принимаются с помощью сетевого децентрализованного комитета, за который голосуют акционеры — владельцы кр…
Запись презентации Bank CWD от 05.08.2024
PDF в комментариях.
Информация о токене: https://cwd.global/asset/BANKCWD
Торговая пара: https://cwd.global/market/BANKCWD_CWD
💬 Делитесь мнениями в комментариях
#запись #презентация #bankcwd
Друзья, приветствуем!
Сегодня в 14:00 прошел эфир, на котором мы анонсировали новый бот, листинг токена и поговорили про текущее положение дел Crowdex. Представляем вам дайджест:
▪️На бирже CWD состоялся листинг криптовалюты 💎 TON. Ссылка на пару CWD\TON. Теперь вывести или ввести токен можно через наш новый бот. О нем ниже.
▪️Crowdex запускает новый объединенный бот для всех сервисов на платформе CWD - @crowdex_c…
Уважаемое сообщество cwd.global!
С сегодняшнего дня, ровно неделю, с 23 мая и до 31 мая включительно, у вас есть возможность отдать свой голос за то какой SmartCoin будем выпускать на нашем блокчейне.
SmartCoin обычно выпускают на любую фиатную валюту, либо на другие предметы обмена, имеющие ценность.
SmartCoin - RUB ?
или
SmartCoin - USD ?
Напомним, что SmartCoin — это криптовалюта, которая всегда обеспечена н…
Уважаемые партнеры!
Комитет платформы CWD Global принял решение об очередном приведении комиссий в соответствие с курсом CWD. Комиссии были повышены на 48%. Обновление уже вступило в силу 24 апреля 2024 года в 19:20 по Московскому времени.
Напомним, как распределяются комиссии за транзакцию.
40% получают держатели GCWD в виде дивидендов, 30% распределяются на сетевое вознаграждение, а 22% сгорают (возвращаются в ре…
...
Начнем с главного. Участники нашего VIP-чата знают, что мы планировали подключать новые продукты в нашу экосистему, так как это позволило бы расширить возможности по дополнительному извлечению прибыли для начисления дивидендов.
С данным решением мы не торопились и проводили свою аналитику проектов, которые могут иметь хорошие перспективы. И, как вы уже поняли, такой
проект нашелся. Имя ему - Axiome Chain
...
И…
А вот само выступление на Token2049 Павла Дурова (CEO Telegram), Андрея Рогозова (CEO TOP и Кошелька) и Паоло Ардоино (CEO Tether) с переводом от Алисы Яндексовны.
🚨 Внимание, уважаемые подписчики!
🚨 Мы вынуждены сообщить о постепенной приостановке операций на платформе CommEX с 25 марта 2024 года.
Подробности поэтапного завершения операций:
📅 25 марта 2024 года, 10:00 UTC
- Закрытие регистрации новых пользователей.
- Прекращение переводов активов с Binance.
- Окончание приема депозитов в фиате и криптовалютах.
📅 28 марта 2024 года, 10:00 UTC
- Завершение открытия позиций п…
🤣10❤2👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cwdinfo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 December 2023 to 2 July 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@cwdinfo named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@gameoflife5 named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CWD.INFO” (@cwdinfo), 2,158 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cwdinfo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
