2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 738–740 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Oct 2026, 18:06
739
no change
26 Oct 2026, 04:22
739
first reading
Engagement
10 posts held, back to 26 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
16.8%
avg views ÷ 739 subscribers
Avg views / post
124
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.79%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 10 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 October 2026
Posts held
10 (26 September 2026 – 22 October 2026)
Views total
744
Reactions total
26
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
26 Oct 2026, 04:22 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
29 reactions across 6 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
12
41.4%
❤
8
27.6%
👍
6
20.7%
👌
3
10.3%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 29 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 26 September 2026 to 22 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔔 Новое в CURS24. Скидку получил клиент, а заработал на ней дизайнер
У нашего клиента был случай. Дизайнер оформлял заказ, а потом возвращался в него: ставил скидку на ткань и на ту же сумму поднимал цену монтажа и навески. Клиент платил те же деньги. Салон терял наценку на ткани, а дизайнеру доставалось больше, потому что его процент считается с работ.
По итогу заказа такую схему не поймать, сумма не меняется. Её …
🔔 Новое в CURS24. Уведомления прямо в системе
Раньше узнать о новой задаче или оплате можно было только через бота в Telegram или MAX. Кто бота не подключил, тот не узнавал ничего. Я часто слышу одно и то же: «не хочу, чтобы рабочие сообщения сыпались в личный мессенджер вперемешку с семейным чатом». И человек остаётся без уведомлений совсем, а потом выясняется, что задачу ему поставили ещё во вторник.
Теперь в CUR…
30 встреч за 2 недели — и один вывод, который меня удивил 🤔
За последние две недели я провёл около 30 встреч с собственниками и руководителями бизнеса. Говорили о процессах, продажах, сотрудниках, о том, что мешает расти.
И вот что бросилось в глаза: только примерно 10% компаний реально используют ИИ в работе. Остальные либо «присматриваются», либо пробовали пару раз и отложили, либо просто не понимают, с чего нача…
👏Tilda теперь дружит с нейросетями.
Сегодня Tilda прислала новость: у них появился MCP-коннектор.
Что это такое, если по-простому? MCP (Model Context Protocol) — открытый стандарт, через который AI-ассистенты подключаются к внешним сервисам. Это как переходник между нейросетью и платформой: он рассказывает агенту, что можно делать в сервисе, и даёт выполнять эти действия от вашего имени.
Что это меняет на практике …
Провести прямой эфир и мастер-класс по наполнению базы знаний через ИИ?
🔥 Да, приду на эфир и мастер-класс48%
👀 Интересно, но удобнее посмотреть в записи52%
🛠 Хочу сразу собрать свою базу вместе с вами19%
🤔 Пока не актуально0%
The shares total 119%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
📚 Как мы написали базу знаний за один вечер
Кто давно с нами, помнит: в базе знаний CURS24 CRM очень долго было всего 3–4 раздела. Причина простая, на документацию никогда не хватает времени. Все понимают, что это нужно, но всегда находятся дела важнее. Мы даже думали нанять отдельного сотрудника, который бы писал и вёл базу знаний.
А потом случилась революция 🚀
✅ За неделю мы написали всю документацию по CURS24: …
Мы дополнили нашу базу знаний документацией на Wiki компании
Подробно расписали как работает этот продукт, как создавать базы знаний, как наполнять и как пользоваться редактором.
Отдельно уделили внимание готовым сценариям для любой компании и тому как сформировать свою базу знаний по своему бизнесу
🚀 Берите CURS24 на развитие!
🔔 Новое в CURS24. 📎 Мы переделали загрузку файлов, фото и видео. Теперь работать с вложениями стало гораздо удобнее
⚠️ Внимание! Мы увеличили лимиты на загрузку файлов. Теперь можно загружать файлы до 100 МБ вместо 20.
Также мы значительно расширили функционал по работе с файлами и изображениями
✅ Видно, что загрузилось, а что нет
У каждого файла своя полоска прогресса, грузятся сразу несколько. Большие фото систе…
❤1
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @curs24. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Провести прямой эфир и мастер-класс по наполнению базы знаний через ИИ?
🔥 Да, приду на эфир и мастер-класс48%
👀 Интересно, но удобнее посмотреть в записи52%
🛠 Хочу сразу собрать свою базу вместе с вами19%
🤔 Пока не актуально0%
The shares total 119%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 26 September 2026 to 22 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CURS24 | CRM и УЧЁТ для бизнеса” (@curs24), 739 subscribers as measured 26 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/curs24.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.