Hi🌟
custom 58299936412920789496custom 52400639875125219092custom 58304554533556143752custom 58301485349926426481custom 58324931361646913711custom 58325332769290392841
Signed 𝑯𝑨𝑵𝑰

Channel
@curlilabs
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
67subscribers
+9 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003708280760 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @curlilabs |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/curlilabs |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 21:29 | 67 | +8 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 05:30 | 59 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:45 | 59 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:02 | 58 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (1 August 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,694 |
| Reactions total | 183 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 05:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
183 reactions across 17 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5231412196801523608 | 32 | 17.5% | |
| custom 5283005345415835804 | 22 | 12.0% | |
| custom 5386648382351630780 | 20 | 10.9% | |
| custom 5240063987512521909 | 19 | 10.4% | |
| custom 5386667310272506463 | 13 | 7.10% | |
| custom 5832533276929039284 | 13 | 7.10% | |
| custom 5174828339138921967 | 11 | 6.01% | |
| custom 5829993641292078949 | 7 | 3.83% | |
| custom 5830455453355614375 | 7 | 3.83% | |
| custom 5211045805481299459 | 6 | 3.28% | |
| custom 5192692418088031800 | 5 | 2.73% | |
| custom 5343542080524277600 | 5 | 2.73% | |
| custom 5343563435101676506 | 4 | 2.19% | |
| custom 5175142215348913490 | 3 | 1.64% | |
| custom 5386535282977816562 | 3 | 1.64% | |
| custom 5832493136164691371 | 3 | 1.64% | |
| custom 5830148534992642648 | 2 | 1.09% | |
| custom 5830468110624236682 | 2 | 1.09% | |
| custom 5832231310663360548 | 2 | 1.09% | |
| custom 5015278176767575655 | 1 | 0.546% | |
| 3 further kinds | 3 | 1.64% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 183reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @curlilabs. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 9 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Hi🌟
custom 58299936412920789496custom 52400639875125219092custom 58304554533556143752custom 58301485349926426481custom 58324931361646913711custom 58325332769290392841
Signed 𝑯𝑨𝑵𝑰
I’m obsessed with mira’s lingo hehe
custom 58325332769290392846custom 58304554533556143753custom 58299936412920789491custom 58301485349926426481
Signed Meet me there
Posted without readable text
custom 58325332769290392846custom 58304554533556143752custom 58304681106242366822
Signed Meet me there
RWA has been getting a lot of attention in crypto lately. The idea is pretty simple: putting real world assets onchain as tokens. What’s interesting is that big financial institutions are getting involved too. JPMorgan, BlackRock, and Goldman Sachs are reportedly exploring the tokenization of stocks and U.S. Treasuries.
custom 52400639875125219092custom 58322313106633605482custom 58324931361646913712custom 50152781767675756551custom 58322125201814408021
Signed Meet me there
Happy Cat Day to the cats that conquered the internet and are now taking over the gift market 🌟
custom 52110458054812994596custom 51926924180880318004custom 52400639875125219093
Signed If you say so
I’m not selling it btw It’s sentimental to me, so no offer is changing that 🌟
custom 52400639875125219094custom 52314121968015236083custom 53866673102725064633custom 51926924180880318001
Signed If you say so
Thats NOT an offer, thats a negotiation opening joke
custom 53866483823516307804custom 51748283391389219672custom 53866673102725064632
Signed If you say so
I bought the dip. The dip bought a basement 🤨
custom 53866483823516307806custom 52830053454158358043custom 51748283391389219672custom 53866673102725064631
Signed If you say so
LUV U GUYS :c
custom 528300534541583580414custom 51748283391389219673custom 52400639875125219092
Signed If you say so
Y’all really said : we’re not leaving. 🐥
custom 523141219680152360815custom 52400639875125219092custom 53866673102725064632
Signed If you say so
Guys, I won’t be active here anymore, so you can go ahead and leave the channel.
custom 52400639875125219094custom 53865352829778165623custom 53866483823516307803custom 52314121968015236082
Signed If you say so
Posted without readable text
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @curlilabs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 10,332 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Curli Labs” (@curlilabs), 67 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/curlilabs.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.