How engineers use anti-slide piles to stabilize slopes and reduce landslide risk. CurioSpark
😁1

Channel
@curiospark9
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
39,910subscribers
+11,560 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002595989641 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @curiospark9 |
| Description | ✨ Why is Saturn hexagonal? Why do cats chirp at birds? Why did Japan build a spiral escalator in 1989? One spark a day — just enough to burn through boredom. |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 28 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/curiospark9 |
Science — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Oct 2026, 15:15 | 39,910 | +6,914 |
| 24 Sept 2026, 22:01 | 32,996 | +6,786 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 20:37 | 26,210 | +1,981 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 08:42 | 24,229 | +710 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 16:00 | 23,519 | -31 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 05:40 | 23,550 | -250 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 06:21 | 23,800 | -931 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 09:14 | 24,731 | -1,381 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 02:14 | 26,112 | -1,337 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 10:22 | 27,449 | -633 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 07:06 | 28,082 | +24 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 09:25 | 28,058 | -5 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 08:24 | 28,063 | +103 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 05:36 | 27,960 | +55 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 07:25 | 27,905 | -1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 06:43 | 27,906 | +44 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 10:14 | 27,862 | +73 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 07:37 | 27,789 | +186 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:03 | 27,603 | +192 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 00:37 | 27,411 | first reading |
140 posts held, back to 8 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 76 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 140 (8 August 2026 – 4 October 2026) |
| Views total | 501,179 |
| Reactions total | 3,046 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 4 Oct 2026, 17:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 113 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
4,065 reactions across 140 posts, in 55 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 5.29% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 215 | 5.29% | |
| 🍌 | 169 | 4.16% | |
| 🏆 | 147 | 3.62% | |
| 😁 | 145 | 3.57% | |
| 🎉 | 138 | 3.39% | |
| 👌 | 123 | 3.03% | |
| 👏 | 123 | 3.03% | |
| 💋 | 120 | 2.95% | |
| 🦄 | 119 | 2.93% | |
| 🎄 | 117 | 2.88% | |
| 🙏 | 117 | 2.88% | |
| 🤷 | 116 | 2.85% | |
| 🎃 | 113 | 2.78% | |
| 🤗 | 113 | 2.78% | |
| 👍 | 100 | 2.46% | |
| 💯 | 97 | 2.39% | |
| 🍾 | 94 | 2.31% | |
| 😘 | 93 | 2.29% | |
| 🐳 | 89 | 2.19% | |
| 😢 | 86 | 2.12% | |
| 35 further kinds | 1,631 | 40.1% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 140 of the 140 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,065 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 140 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 4 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Measured over the 140 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 4 October 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Price spike. Volume surge. Trend flip. You saw it 30 minutes late? Then it’s already gone. CoinBlitz doesn’t write essays. It pings signals, flips charts, and drops alerts — fast. For those who trade on instinct and data. Timing isn’t everything. It’s the only thing. https://t.me/coinblitz5 #ad #sponosred
🎃3
How engineers use anti-slide piles to stabilize slopes and reduce landslide risk. CurioSpark
😁1
How South Korea’s Coast Guard officers train for search-and-rescue operations in simulated rough sea conditions. CurioSpark
🥰6🙏1
This is a firefly larva. Fireflies spend most of their lives beneath leaf litter and in the soil. Most species remain in the larval stage for one to two years before emerging as adults, which typically live only a few weeks. CurioSpark
🥰6🙏4🦄3😘1
Zalipie, a village in southern Poland where homes are decorated with colorful hand-painted floral folk art. The tradition is believed to have begun over a century ago as a way to cover soot stains from wood-burning stoves and has since become part of the village’s cultural identity. CurioSpark
🎄6😴5🍓4❤3🤗2😁2🙏2
Training a golden eagle for hunting as part of Kyrgyzstan’s centuries-old berkutchi tradition, where eagles are trained to work alongside their handlers. CurioSpark
💔4💯4🙈3🌭2🍌2🤔2🤣2🤩2
Fascinating drone footage looking down into a volcanic eruption from above. CurioSpark
🤗7💔5😁3🗿2😱2😍1
Why do fingers wrinkle in water—but not the rest of the body? It’s not passive soaking. It’s a nervous reflex. Water enters sweat ducts, triggering nerves to constrict blood vessels under the skin. Volume drops, skin folds into grooves. This only happens on palms, soles, and fingertips—thick, hairless skin packed with sweat glands and blood vessels. Forearms lack this setup. The folds act like tire treads, channeling…
🏆22🎉13🙏9🤬8🦄8😘7🎄5💋5
Gimme a drink! CurioSpark
😁16🍓12🎃9🤗9🤬6🤣5🙈5🙉5
The highest settlement on Earth. La Rinconada, Peru, at ~5,100 m, is the world’s highest permanent town. Thousands live and work here, driven by gold. Life is harsh: freezing temps, low oxygen, and minimal infrastructure. Miners often labor for weeks unpaid under *cachorreo*—a system allowing them just one or two days monthly to keep gold they find. No gold? Worked for free. Gold extraction takes a toll. Accidents…
😨15🎄9🤷8🎉7👻5💋3🤗3😡3
Grand Prismatic Spring, Yellowstone. Hot water rises in the middle, too extreme for most life, so it stays deep blue. it cools outward, different microbes take over: yellow Synechococcus, orange Chloroflexi. Their pigments, not dyes, make the rainbow CurioSpark
😁16👍12🌭11🎄9🏆9💋9🦄8🍌7
A robotic phone farm with rigs that continuously tap, swipe, and scroll through short videos. The system simulates human activity around the clock, generating artificial views, watch time, likes, and other engagement signals. CurioSpark
😎11👌10🍌9😢8🐳7😍7🙏7🤷6
Showing the 12 most recent of 140 posts we hold for @curiospark9. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CurioSpark” (@curiospark9), 39,910 subscribers as measured 3 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/curiospark9.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.