Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Культурный Кот

Channel

Культурный Кот

@culturny_kot

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

1,049subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001604115660
TypeChannel
Username@culturny_kot
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/culturny_kot

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 67% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,0491,0551,0527 August 2026 — 1,055 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,055 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,054 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,055 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,054 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,053 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,051 subscribers15 September 2026 — 1,050 subscribers19 September 2026 — 1,049 subscribers7 August 202619 September 2026
9 measurements spanning 43 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,048–1,056 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 10:571,049-1
15 Sept 2026, 07:571,050-1
30 Aug 2026, 18:131,051-2
24 Aug 2026, 22:141,053-1
14 Aug 2026, 14:551,054-1
10 Aug 2026, 22:311,055+1
8 Aug 2026, 00:121,054-1
7 Aug 2026, 06:321,055no change
7 Aug 2026, 06:201,055first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 17 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

210 reactions across 14 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥8540.5%
👍6832.4%
3717.6%
🦄125.71%
🎉41.90%
20.952%
👏10.476%
💯10.476%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 210 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 February 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2026, 07:03 UTC143 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026

МАГИЯ ВНЕ ХОГВАРТСА И снова всем привет! Появляюсь тут редко, но приношу в клювике пищу для размышления. 💫 Сегодня поговорим про магию. Вжух! А еще про религию и науку. Именно их выделяет Джеймс Фрэзер, автор знаменитой «Золотой ветви», как способы взаимодействия человека с окружающим его необъятным миром, будь то боги, природа-матушка или сверхъестественные силы. 💫 Нам, людям 21 века, на первый взгляд может показ

🔥10👍742

4 May 2026, 07:44 UTC455 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026

МАЙСКИЕ ПРАЗДНИКИ: ОТ ЖЕРТВЕННЫХ КОСТРОВ ДО ДАЧНЫХ ШАШЛЫКОВ Часть 3 День Ивана Купала 🕊 Во-первых, кто этот Иван и кого он купал? Тут все просто, под этот праздник церковь подтянула Иоанна Предтечу (он же Иоанн Креститель), который совершал ритуальное омовение евреев в Иордане, а потом крестил и самого Иисуса Христа. Как и в случае со Святым Георгием, в этот день славяне и в дохристианское время проводили обряды,

🔥157👍5👏1

4 May 2026, 07:43 UTC357 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026

МАЙСКИЕ ПРАЗДНИКИ: ОТ ЖЕРТВЕННЫХ КОСТРОВ ДО ДАЧНЫХ ШАШЛЫКОВ Часть 2 Ну что, продолжаем разговор про майские праздники. ☦️ Христианская церковь, как известно, строила храмы на месте капищ не только в прямом, но и в переносном смысле. Праздники церковного календаря часто подбивались по датам под особенно укорененные сельскохозяйственные обычаи, а дальше они переплетались так причудливо, что не сразу и разберешь. Так

🔥95👍4

1 May 2026, 07:00 UTC350 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026

МАЙСКИЕ ПРАЗДНИКИ: ОТ ЖЕРТВЕННЫХ КОСТРОВ ДО ДАЧНЫХ ШАШЛЫКОВ Часть 1 🎊 Мало какие праздничные циклы так упорно выживают в истории, несмотря на смену эпох и идеологий, как майские гуляния. У греков и римлян, кельтов и славян, иудеев и христиан, при советской власти и даже в современном светском обществе майские праздники – это святое. Тут, конечно, намешана невероятная каша-малаша, и возможно никто уже особо не помни

🔥10👍76

6 Mar 2026, 07:00 UTC525 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026

А когда мой сын станет постарше, я просто покажу ему это видео от A Capella Science. Ну а с вами делюсь уже сейчас. В нем прекрасно абсолютно всё. Только посмотрите, человек за 4 минуты объясняет всю суть эволюционной биологии на мотив Despacito и делает это абсолютно а капелла! Ну красота же! P.S. В настройках можно включить русские субтитры

🔥133👍3🎉1

4 Mar 2026, 07:00 UTC465 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026

​​ЭВОЛЮЦИЯ В ДВУХ СЛОВАХ, ИЛИ О ВКУСАХ НЕ СПОРЯТ 🧬 Когда мой сын спросит меня, почему у жирафа длинная шея, я не скажу ему «чтобы дотянуться до верхних листочков». Хотя доля истины в этом ответе есть. Я скажу: «Потому что остальные умерли, сынок». И в общем-то этими двумя словами можно передать всю суть эволюции. Ведь если начистоту, то дело не в том, что живые организмы как-то в моменте приспосабливаются к новым ус

👍10🔥105🎉3💯1

19 Feb 2026, 07:00 UTC482 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026

​​КАК ЛИСТ ПЕРЕД ТРАВОЙ, ИЛИ ВСЕ О СКАЗОЧНЫХ КОНЯХ 🦄 Как и обещала, рассказываю. Со сказочными конями вообще интересно получается. Пропп относит их к категории волшебных помощников. Они берутся как будто из ниоткуда и решают все проблемы героя. Но давайте присмотримся к ним поближе. 🦄 Так ли уж из ниоткуда? На самом деле, волшебного коня сказочный герой как правило получает либо в наследство, либо от Яги, либо из «

🔥137🦄5👍3

17 Feb 2026, 07:03 UTC381 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Что это за восьминогий конь?

  1. Буцефал3%
  2. Инцитат3%
  3. Пегас0%
  4. Сивка-Бурка, Вещая Каурка2%
  5. Слейпнир88%
  6. Росинант2%
  7. Маренго1%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👍1

17 Feb 2026, 07:02 UTC357 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Что это за бравый конь?

  1. Буцефал5%
  2. Инцитат4%
  3. Пегас0%
  4. Сивка-Бурка, Вещая Каурка0%
  5. Слейпнир11%
  6. Росинант5%
  7. Маренго76%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

17 Feb 2026, 07:02 UTC358 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Что это за мощный конь?

  1. Буцефал85%
  2. Инцитат5%
  3. Пегас0%
  4. Сивка-Бурка, Вещая Каурка0%
  5. Слейпнир6%
  6. Росинант0%
  7. Маренго4%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @culturny_kot. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 7 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

17 Feb 2026, 07:03 UTCAnonymous Quiz89 voters

Что это за восьминогий конь?

  1. Буцефал3%
  2. Инцитат3%
  3. Пегас0%
  4. Сивка-Бурка, Вещая Каурка2%
  5. Слейпнир88%
  6. Росинант2%
  7. Маренго1%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

17 Feb 2026, 07:02 UTCAnonymous Quiz83 voters

Что это за бравый конь?

  1. Буцефал5%
  2. Инцитат4%
  3. Пегас0%
  4. Сивка-Бурка, Вещая Каурка0%
  5. Слейпнир11%
  6. Росинант5%
  7. Маренго76%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

17 Feb 2026, 07:02 UTCAnonymous Quiz82 voters

Что это за мощный конь?

  1. Буцефал85%
  2. Инцитат5%
  3. Пегас0%
  4. Сивка-Бурка, Вещая Каурка0%
  5. Слейпнир6%
  6. Росинант0%
  7. Маренго4%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

17 Feb 2026, 07:02 UTCAnonymous Quiz90 voters

Что это за крылатый конь?

  1. Буцефал1%
  2. Инцитат0%
  3. Пегас98%
  4. Сивка-Бурка, Вещая Каурка0%
  5. Слейпнир1%
  6. Росинант0%
  7. Маренго0%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

17 Feb 2026, 07:02 UTCAnonymous Quiz82 voters

Что это за богатый конь?

  1. Буцефал72%
  2. Инцитат23%
  3. Пегас0%
  4. Сивка-Бурка, Вещая Каурка0%
  5. Слейпнир1%
  6. Росинант2%
  7. Маренго1%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

17 Feb 2026, 07:02 UTCAnonymous Quiz87 voters

Что это за прыгучий конь?

  1. Буцефал1%
  2. Инцитат0%
  3. Пегас1%
  4. Сивка-Бурка, Вещая Каурка97%
  5. Слейпнир1%
  6. Росинант0%
  7. Маренго0%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 February 2026 to 30 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Культурный Кот” (@culturny_kot), 1,049 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/culturny_kot.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.