Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Культ Безопасности

@cult_security

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

10,973subscribers

-33 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001419012404
TypeChannel
Username@cult_security
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/cult_security

Growth

10,97311,00610,989.56 August 2026 — 11,006 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,001 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,998 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,997 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,989 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,990 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,983 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,976 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,973 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net -33. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,968–11,011 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 17:3810,973-3
12 Aug 2026, 17:4710,976-7
11 Aug 2026, 17:4210,983-7
10 Aug 2026, 18:0610,990+1
9 Aug 2026, 19:5110,989-8
8 Aug 2026, 20:1610,997-1
7 Aug 2026, 23:3410,998-3
6 Aug 2026, 22:4211,001-5
6 Aug 2026, 08:2111,006first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.3%
avg views ÷ 10,973 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,130
23 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.28%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
23
of 23 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held23 (31 July 202612 August 2026)
Views total25,919
Reactions total331
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 04:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

288 reactions across 21 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤝6522.6%
🔥4917.0%
👍4214.6%
🤣3512.2%
3311.5%
😱155.21%
💯124.17%
😢93.13%
👏72.43%
🎉62.08%
😍62.08%
🫡41.39%
👎31.04%
😡20.694%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 331reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 15:08 UTC415 views5 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Защита от атак AI-агентов Российские исследователи выпустили Autonomous Agent Defense Matrix — матрица защиты от нестандартных атак на ИИ-агентов. Тема очень актуальна в контексте того, как разбаловались фронтирные модели от ведущих разработчиков. Кажется, не попытавшихся кого-нибудь атаковать за эту неделю не осталось. Внутри 16 техник: от отравления контекста до захвата памяти. В примерах — тесты OpenAI, где аген

🔥31👍1

12 Aug 2026, 06:09 UTC677 views31 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Слишком хорошая грамматика Студент-медик Сент-Эндрюсского университета едва не лишился диплома из-за чересчур качественного текста. Преподаватели заподозрили двадцатилетнего парня в использовании генеративного ИИ при написании диссертации об игровой терапии. Экспертов насторожили идеальная пунктуация, шаблонная структура абзацев и частые длинные тире, которые якобы выдают алгоритмы. После первого слушания комиссия

🤝292

11 Aug 2026, 15:08 UTC912 views31 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Школьница обошла родительский контроль с помощью AI Одиннадцатилетняя дочь предпринимателя Сици Чена нашла нестандартный способ обойти ограничения экранного времени для YouTube. Девочка попросила нейросеть Claude собрать браузер на базе Electron и Chromium, запустила его на ноутбуке отца и продолжила смотреть видео без родительского лимита. Отец подстёгивал интерес дочери обещанием безлимитного экранного времени за

🔥19😱4🤝3🤣31👍1

11 Aug 2026, 06:09 UTC968 views9 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Криптография бессильна против гаечного ключа Преступники с начала года похитили у владельцев криптовалюты более 30 млн долларов через физические нападения. С учётом провалов и запрошенных выкупов потенциальный ущерб пробивает 107 млн долларов. Техническая защита кошельков уступает место похищениям и вторжениям в дома. К концу июня Chainalysis насчитала 46 известных атак по всему миру, но лишь 12 из них завершились

😢6🤝2😱1

10 Aug 2026, 15:08 UTC≈1,010 views8 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Телефонная атака на обитателей Уолл-стрит Исследователи связали серию атак на крупнейшие финансовые компании с группировкой UNC6671, известной под брендом BlackFile. Злоумышленники звонят сотрудникам на личные телефоны, притворяются техподдержкой и под предлогом срочной настройки passkey выманивают учётные данные. Под прицелом хакеров оказались Citadel, Point72, Millennium Management и Two Sigma. Хакеры перехватыва

2👍2🔥2😢2

10 Aug 2026, 06:09 UTC≈1,030 views22 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Когда HR на собеседовании спросил про стек технологий #мем Join our club Cult 👁

🤣12🔥81👍1

9 Aug 2026, 12:00 UTC≈1,040 views11 reactionsread 13 August 2026
File

2026 H1 APT REPORT: How APTs Are Weaponizing Trust in the Age of AI И снова про уже надоевший AI, на этот раз — в руках APT-группировок, что всегда любопытно. Эксперты из TrendAI Research опубликовали опубликовали отчёт о главных угрозах первой половины 2026 года. Среди ключевых трендов — активное внедрение ИИ на разных этапах атак, ускорение поиска и эксплуатации 0-day уязвимостей, компрометация цепочек поставок ПО

👍5🔥3🎉2🫡1

8 Aug 2026, 12:00 UTC≈1,070 views6 reactionsread 13 August 2026
File

IBM: Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026 Наконец-то наступили выходные, самое время почитать многостраничные отчеты. Сегодня — про утечки данных, их стоимость и тренды. Компания IBM опубликовала свежий отчет Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026. Средняя стоимость утечки данных во всем мире выросла на 12% и достигла 4,99 млн долларов, а в США этот показатель и вовсе пробил рекордные 11,5 млн. Главный виновник раздутых уб

🤝42

7 Aug 2026, 15:08 UTC≈1,180 views10 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Шпионский софт под видом халявных iOS-приложений Специалисты «Лаборатории Касперского» обнаружили троянизированные версии популярного софта для iOS со встроенными шпионскими модулями. Заражённые IPA-файлы маркетплейса, фоторедактора и видеосервиса распространяли через русскоязычный канал в Telegram. Пользователям предлагали подписать приложения сертификатом разработчика через eSign или Scarlet. Встроенный модуль во

6🤝3👍1

7 Aug 2026, 06:09 UTC967 views12 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @package_security

Самый модный шпион по версии Vogue Держите забавную пиар-кампанию. Австралийская разведка (ASIS) решила запартнериться с модным изданием Vogue (что? Да). Глава ASIS Керри Хартленд, которая почти никогда не выступала публично, внезапно стала звездой подкастов и мероприятий модного журнала. В 2025 году Хартленд выступила на Vogue Codes – ежегодном саммите, ориентированном на женщин в сфере STEM и технологий. А в 2026

🔥9👍3

6 Aug 2026, 15:08 UTC≈1,260 views11 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Соседский чат под прицелом Злоумышленники притворяются жильцами того же дома в мессенджерах. Об этом предупредили в МВД России Петербурга и Ленобласти. Неизвестные пишут в личные сообщения и выдумывают подозрительного незнакомца у подъезда. Под видом видеозаписи с камеры наблюдения жертве присылают вредоносный файл, который крадёт персональные данные и доступы. Соседская взаимопомощь вывела социальную инженерию на

8👍3

6 Aug 2026, 06:09 UTC≈1,250 views15 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Смутные перспективы айтишников «Лаборатория Касперского» выяснила, что каждый пятый ИТ-специалист со стажем от пяти лет не понимает своего карьерного пути. При этом 82% респондентов планируют оставаться в найме ближайшие 10 лет, а подавляющее большинство считает лояльность одной компании эффективнее частой смены работы. Видение своей карьеры всего на 1–2 года есть у 35% опрошенных, при этом среди главных приоритето

💯12🤣2🤝1

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @cult_security. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 289,985 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Культ Безопасности” (@cult_security), 10,973 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cult_security.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.