Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for /cub/dates and news

Channel

/cub/dates and news

@cubdates

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry

352subscribers

+11 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002471523164
TypeChannel
Username@cubdates
Created5 October 2024measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live23 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 23 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/cubdates

Growth

341352346.57 August 2026 — 341 subscribers8 August 2026 — 341 subscribers16 August 2026 — 344 subscribers23 August 2026 — 352 subscribers7 August 202623 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 16 days, net +11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 339–354 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
23 Aug 2026, 21:04352+8
16 Aug 2026, 14:58344+3
8 Aug 2026, 07:02341no change
7 Aug 2026, 20:43341first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 5 October 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

168 reactions across 11 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍5633.3%
5231.0%
👎3520.8%
🙏84.76%
🖕52.98%
🔥42.38%
👏31.79%
🫡31.79%
😈10.595%
😍10.595%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 168reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 5 October 2024 to 8 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
74
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 17 we hold a reading for · 18%
Most on one post
70
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @cubdates. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 October 2024 to 8 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

8 Jun 2026, 16:34 UTC685 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Bot will be back up in a second, our infra provider has had to do some emergency work and we've been affected Luckily they were able to suspend everything so it should (🤞) just resume in the next 4 or so hours ~~devmin

9🫡3🔥1

24 Jan 2026, 22:49 UTC≈2,060 views15 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

We're sorry for the continued downtime, the maintenence on the providers side has hit an issue We may be able to come back soon on interim hardware, but it would rollback some karma and tripcodes. If we do decide to get something up in the meantime, I have to let you know all karma gained should be considered temporary, as we don't log who gives karma to who, and we will also be disabling signing and banning anyone w

14😈1

23 Jan 2026, 21:20 UTC≈1,870 viewsread 8 August 2026

Bot is currently down for maintenance on the server it's running on ~~devmin

20 Aug 2025, 14:29 UTC≈3,430 viewsread 8 August 2026

Due to an unknown issue at our server provider the bot has been down today. We are unsure as to when the issue will be resolved at the provider's end, we'll try to keep you in the loop if we know when the bot will be back up.

10 Jun 2025, 19:01 UTC≈4,230 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

new rule, no public role-playing in the bot Motd will be updated in course Bot is getting slammed with ratelimits from two people deciding to go "uwu OwO awa" split between three messages ~~devmin

👏3

18 Jan 2025, 07:54 UTC≈4,880 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Payment for the server got bounced for potential fraud and I missed the email but the bot is back up now and bank told plz no do again ~~devmin

3

19 Dec 2024, 20:07 UTC≈4,630 views26 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Rules updated. Rule 3 amended to ban *all* media involving real children.

👍22👎4

1 Dec 2024, 00:09 UTC≈4,740 views80 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Update to the rules (/motd in the bot). As per the new rule 11, AI generated content may no longer be posted in the bot.

👎3125👍16🖕5🔥3

26 Nov 2024, 11:21 UTCviews —

/cub/dates and news pinned «If AI art were no longer allowed in the bot, I would..»

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @cubdates. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

26 Nov 2024, 11:19 UTCFinal Results112 voters

If AI art were no longer allowed in the bot, I would..

  1. Have a positive reaction39%
  2. Not care and do nothing19%
  3. Be disappointed but ultimately do nothing28%
  4. Complain10%
  5. Leave the bot4%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

29 Oct 2024, 19:02 UTCFinal Results158 voters

What is your opinion on AI Art in the bot

  1. I don't mind it36%
  2. I'm a fan25%
  3. I'm not a fan39%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 5 October 2024 to 8 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“/cub/dates and news” (@cubdates), 352 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cubdates.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.