Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

حقوق احداث؛ با الگوی رائد *حمید حسین‌زاده*

@cscmlaw

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,700subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001515719106
TypeChannel
Username@cscmlaw
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/cscmlaw

Growth

1,7001,7021,7016 August 2026 — 1,702 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,702 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,700 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 6 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,700–1,702 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 11:571,700-2
6 Aug 2026, 16:431,702no change
6 Aug 2026, 16:361,702first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 23 December 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

13 reactions across 6 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍646.2%
538.5%
🔥17.69%
🥰17.69%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 23 December 2023 to 16 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

16 Jun 2026, 06:15 UTCviews —

Channel name was changed to «حقوق احداث؛ با الگوی رائد *حمید حسین‌زاده*»

28 May 2025, 14:37 UTCviews —

حقوق احداث؛ با الگوی رائد *حمید حسین‌زاده* pinned Deleted message

27 Jan 2024, 10:28 UTC≈5,370 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

📊بررسی صحت درج شرط عدم تعلق تعدیل در قراردادهای سرجمع سازمان برنامه و بودجه آیا می‌توان بر خلاف نص قرارداد سرجمع، شرط تعدیل پذیری را از آن‌ها، حذف نمود؟ ⚠️⭕️ در یک قرارداد ذیل نظام فنی و اجرایی کشور، در شرایط خصوصی نوشته شده «به این قرارداد، تعدیل تعلق نمی‌گیرد»، با وجود صراحت در متن قرارداد سرجمع سازمان برنامه و بودجه، مبنی بر لزوم تعدیل‌پذیری این نوع قراردادها، آیا چنین شرطی دارای اثر حقوقی است؟ 🎥 فصل سوم، قسمت

2👍1

20 Jan 2024, 09:53 UTC≈4,820 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

📊اقلام فاکتوری، یا کارِ اضافه؟ اثر ماهیت اقلام کار، بر سقف ۲۵٪ مبلغ پیمان آیا به‌منظور جلوگیری از پر شدن سقف ۲۵٪ مبلغ قرارداد، می‌توان ماهیت کارها را تغییر داد؟ ⚠️⭕️ در یک قرارداد ذیل نظام فنی و اجرایی کشور، کارفرما به‌جهت اینکه افزایش مبلغ پیمان از سقف ۲۵٪ مبلغ اولیه عبور نکند، کارهای اضافی را که دارای ردیف متناظر در فهرست منضم بوده است، در قالب اقلام فاکتوری، به پیمانکار پرداخت نموده است. آیا این پرداخت، مبتنی بر

14 Jan 2024, 05:16 UTC≈4,830 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

💸آزادسازی سپرده حسن انجام کار پس از تحویل موقت بررسی لزوم/ عدم لزوم تسلیم ضمانت نامه به‌منظور آزادسازی سپرده، پس از تحویل موقت 🎥 فصل سوم، قسمت چهارم از برنامه کنج (کاوش‌های نوین جمعی) قراردادها 🔸برنامه کنج قراردادها، نخستین و تنها برنامه در سطح ملی و مبتنی بر پرسش و پاسخ در حوزه‌های حقوقی و قراردادی صنعت پیمانکاری است؛ که توسط موسسه حقوق احداث، تحت نظر و الگوی آقای مهندس حمید حسین‌زاده (استراتژیست) و با همراهی متخصصی

1👍1🔥1

7 Jan 2024, 05:26 UTC≈5,370 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

«یک تعدیل و چند شاخص مبنا» کارفرمایی دولتی، با انگیزه کاهش هزینه پروژه، در شرایط خصوصی، درج شرط نموده: دوره شاخص مبنا برای مدّت تمدید، یک دورۀ سه ماهه قبل از تمدید می‌باشد بدین معنا که با هر تمدید مدت پیمان، شاخص مبنا، به جلو کشیده خواهد شد، آیا درج چنین شرطی دارای اثر حقوقی است؟ 💥قسمت سوم از فصل سوم کنج قراردادها با موضوع «به‌ روز رسانی شاخص مبنای تعدیل، با هر تمدید مدت پیمان» 💎آیا می‌توان برای قراردادهای پیمان

👍4

1 Jan 2024, 15:17 UTC≈1,730 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @amirclaimsPhoto

💥💥قسمت دوم از فصل سوم کنج قراردادها «شرایط انعقاد متمم پیمان» 💎هزینه کارهای مازاد بر ۱۲۵ درصد را چگونه اخذ کنیم؟💎 ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ ✳️مشاهده آفلاین هر برنامه پس از اخذ اشتراک: یک‌ میلیون تومان ✳️ مشاهده آنلاین برنامه کنج، همراه با ملاحظه نظرات و سوالات سایر متخصصین از سراسر کشور، همچنین دریافت پاسخ سوال خود (البته مرتبط با موضوع هر برنامه): رایگان ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 🔰زمان پخش آنلاین برنامه کنج: چهارشنبه هر هفته، ساعت ۲۰ ❇️ برای ث

1

28 Dec 2023, 10:32 UTC≈3,760 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

💥💥قسمت دوم از فصل سوم کنج قراردادها «شرایط انعقاد متمم پیمان» 💎هزینه کارهای مازاد بر ۱۲۵ درصد را چگونه اخذ کنیم؟💎 🔸برنامه کنج قراردادها، نخستین و تنها برنامه در سطح ملی و مبتنی بر پرسش و پاسخ در حوزه‌های حقوقی و قراردادی صنعت پیمانکاری است؛ که توسط موسسه حقوق احداث، تحت نظر و الگوی آقای مهندس حمید حسین‌زاده (استراتژیست) و با همراهی متخصصین میان‌رشته‌ای، برگزار می‌شود. ❇️ در هر قسمت از برنامه، ضمن پاسخ به یک سوال مشخص

🥰1

23 Dec 2023, 13:16 UTC≈4,410 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

💥💥فصل جدید (سوم) برنامه کنج قراردادها 🔸برنامه کنج قراردادها، نخستین و تنها برنامه در سطح ملی و مبتنی بر پرسش و پاسخ در حوزه‌های حقوقی و قراردادی صنعت پیمانکاری است؛ که توسط موسسه حقوق احداث، تحت نظر و الگوی آقای مهندس حمید حسین‌زاده (استراتژیست) و با همراهی متخصصین میان‌رشته‌ای، برگزار می‌شود. ❇️ در هر قسمت از برنامه، ضمن پاسخ به یک سوال مشخص، مبادی و مبانی قراردادی و حقوقی آن مسأله، تبیین و تحلیل می‌شود. ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️

1

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @cscmlaw. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,123,075 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“حقوق احداث؛ با الگوی رائد *حمید حسین‌زاده*” (@cscmlaw), 1,700 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cscmlaw.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.